The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 87 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
apaleo GmbH shines in ease of use , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Counter shines when it comes to user interface and usability , with exclusive features like Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 87 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 57 |
After analyzing 87 verified reviews, apaleo GmbH users most value its frequent updates and community engagement, customization and flexibility, open api and integration, while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Frequent Updates and Community Engagement
▾
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
−
Group and Booking Management
▾
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #42 7 reviews | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #27 19 reviews | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #41 1 reviews | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 3 reviews | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #34 14 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | #43 4 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #40 4 reviews | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #19 9 reviews | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #18 26 reviews | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between Apaleo Open PMS and Counter hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Apaleo offers a comprehensive, scalable platform with extensive integrations and features tailored for larger, multi-property, or more complex hospitality groups. Counter, on the other hand, is a streamlined, user-friendly PMS designed specifically for hostels and small hostelry operations, prioritizing ease of use and automation.
Both systems aim to simplify hotel management but diverge significantly in scope and complexity. Are you seeking a broad, customizable platform with advanced features, or a straightforward, easy-to-operate solution for hosting guests? Let’s compare them across key areas.
Apaleo and Counter address core hotel management challenges but target different segments and operational scales. Apaleo is built for hotels that need a flexible, API-first platform to integrate various third-party tools, supporting complex workflows and large portfolios. Counter caters primarily to hostels, offering ease of setup and daily operational automation in a simplified interface.
Apaleo’s recent reviews highlight its stability and extensive feature set, with a score of 77.5, over twice Counter’s 16.5. Counter’s reviews, however, emphasize its simplicity and responsiveness, especially appreciated by hostel operators. Does your hotel need sophisticated, customizable workflows, or is a straightforward interface enough? Consider your team’s technical comfort and scale of operations.
If your hotel operates a large chain or multiple properties with complex needs, go with Apaleo. Its open API, extensive integration options, and over 120 verified partners make it ideal for advanced automation, customized workflows, and multi-system orchestration. It’s suited for hotels seeking to create a tailored tech ecosystem that scales.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property prioritizing ease of use, fast onboarding, and minimal technical setup, Counter is the better choice. Its intuitive web interface, automation features like contactless check-in, and dedicated focus on hostels make it suitable for teams that want to manage operations on the go without deep technical resources.
Apaleo scores a 4.9/5 for ease of use, with users praising its friendly interface, quick onboarding, and minimal downtime. Reviews mention that non-technical staff find it straightforward after initial setup, though some note that its broad feature set can initially seem complex.
Counter has a 4.6/5 rating, with hoteliers highlighting its simplicity, fast learning curve, and seamless mobile access. Its clean, intuitive interface minimizes staff training time, making it perfect for small teams or hostels without dedicated tech staff.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s feature set is extensive, totaling 20 unique functionalities, including integrated CRS, automated space optimization, real-time status updates, online check-in/out, digital registration, and housekeeper mobile apps. It also offers advanced rate and tax management, PCI, GDPR, and SOC2 compliance, making it a comprehensive management platform.
Counter’s features focus on core hostel operations, with 2 unique features: a booking engine and guest CRM. While excellent for basic reservation management, it lacks advanced automation, group management, or integrated payment features found in Apaleo.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s support team earns a 4.83/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly responses and active community engagement. Users appreciate their support quality, though some suggest additional support channels could improve.
Counter’s support scores even higher at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and the professionalism of team members like Evelyn and Max. Users value their quick problem resolution, especially during system bugs, despite some noting slower support in certain time zones.
Edge: Counter.
Apaleo boasts over 120 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Revenue Management, and booking engines, offering a versatile ecosystem. Common integrations with Counter include Stripe, Goki, and Channel Managers like WuBook, but it supports far fewer partners overall—only 7 verified.
Shared integrations include FLYR Hospitality and SiteMinder. If extensive, third-party integration options are crucial, Apaleo’s diverse partner network clearly outperforms Counter’s limited offerings.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo has an overall review score of 0/5 from 29 reviews, which appears to be an error or placeholder, but its high NPS score of 9.69/10 and recent reviews indicate strong satisfaction among its users. Its community is active, and clients like citizenM and easyHotel testify to its scalability.
Counter has a 4.73/5 rating from 54 reviews, with consistent praise from hostel operators for its ease of use, automation, and support. Its focused design resonates well with small hostels, reflected in high satisfaction ratings.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Counter’s higher user ratings make it the more trusted choice for small-scale hostelry.
Edge: Counter.
Apaleo’s pricing starts at $900 monthly, with no free tier, freemium options, or trial. Its cost may be justified by its feature depth and integrations, suited for larger properties or groups.
Counter is a free platform with no listed fees, making it highly attractive for hostels and small properties with tight budgets. Additional integrations or features may incur charges or require customization.
In summary, if budget is tight and your operation is small, Counter’s free model offers significant value. Larger hotels should evaluate if Apaleo’s investment aligns with their operational complexity.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small hostel or has minimal tech needs, as the platform’s complexity may be unnecessary or overwhelming.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced automation, extensive integrations, or complex group management features.
Apaleo is a highly flexible, feature-rich platform ideal for large, multi-property operations that need customized workflows and integrations. It provides a robust environment for automation, data reporting, and third-party connectivity, but at a higher cost and complexity.
Counter offers a straightforward, hostelry-focused PMS that emphasizes ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation for small properties and hostels. It’s especially suited for teams without technical resources who want to streamline daily operations.
Choose Apaleo if your hotel demands extensive customization, integrations, and scalability. Opt for Counter if simplicity, quick deployment, and cost efficiency are your top priorities.
In conclusion, for larger hotels or chains, Apaleo’s broader feature set and open ecosystem make it the better choice. Conversely, for small hostels or boutique properties, Counter’s ease and affordability will serve you better, especially given its high user satisfaction and active support.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Apaleo Open PMS and Counter share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 10 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing impro... The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing improvements. The active community provides a support network that enhances the user experience.
Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems t... Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems that align perfectly with their operational needs, enhancing efficiency and improving guest services.
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
Where hoteliers push back
While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current o... While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current options limited, leading to reliance on additional tools for deeper analytics.
Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehe... Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehensive functionality and intuitiveness.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Apaleo Open PMS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Apaleo Open PMS offers 120 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Apaleo Open PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Apaleo Open PMS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. apaleo GmbH has an HT Score of 78 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor