The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 64 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
apaleo GmbH shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Shiji Group shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 64 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 34 |
After analyzing 64 verified reviews, apaleo GmbH users most value its frequent updates and community engagement, customization and flexibility, open api and integration, while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Frequent Updates and Community Engagement
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
−
Group and Booking Management
▾
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #42 7 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #27 19 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #41 1 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 3 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #34 14 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #43 4 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #40 4 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #19 9 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #38 2 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #18 26 reviews | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and growth potential. Both Apaleo Open PMS by apaleo GmbH and Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group aim to streamline hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, technological needs, and preferred level of customization, as both products address core PMS functions but diverge in features, integrations, and user experience.
Apaleo’s open API architecture makes it highly adaptable for hotels seeking tailor-made solutions, while Shiji’s more comprehensive feature set targets larger properties or hotel groups wanting an all-in-one platform. But which one better matches your hotel’s specific requirements?
Both Apaleo and Shiji deliver cloud-based PMS solutions that centralize guest data and automate routine tasks, yet they differ in scope and flexibility. Apaleo’s platform is designed for hotels and serviced apartments that want to build their tech ecosystem through third-party integrations, giving it an edge in customization. Shiji offers a wider array of built-in features aimed at larger hotel groups, with many modules designed to provide end-to-end management from reservations to housekeeping.
While Apaleo’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, open API, and community support, Shiji’s strengths lie in its extensive feature library, particularly for larger hotels seeking a unified system. The question is whether your hotel prefers a modular, flexible system or a feature-rich, integrated platform.
If your hotel needs a flexible, API-first system that adapts easily to your existing tech stack, go with Apaleo. Its open architecture supports rapid customization, and its user-friendly interface suits hotels looking to automate workflows without sacrificing control over their technology environment. Conversely, if your hotel or group prioritizes a comprehensive, all-in-one PMS with extensive modules—such as advanced reporting, guest profiles, and automation—Shiji’s broader feature set makes it the better choice.
For boutique hotels or serviced apartments aiming for agility, Apaleo’s ability to connect with third-party apps is invaluable. Larger hotels or chains requiring a unified platform with multiple integrated modules should lean toward Shiji.
Apaleo’s ease of use is reflected in its high UI/UX rating of 4.9/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive, friendly interface. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.85/5, enabling hotel staff to adopt the system quickly, even with minimal prior experience. Users highlight the simplicity of navigating complex functionalities thanks to its clean design and open API, which minimizes training time.
Shiji’s user-friendliness is also well-rated at 4.63/5, with an emphasis on straightforward operation and accessible training materials. However, its broader feature set can introduce additional complexity, requiring more initial training.
Edge: Apaleo.
Shiji offers a significantly larger feature set with 63 modules compared to Apaleo’s 2 exclusive features, such as its channel manager and mobile app. Shiji’s extensive modules include guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, online check-in/out, integrated CRM, and a housekeeping module—features that enhance operational automation and guest personalization.
Apaleo’s core strength is its open API, enabling integrations rather than providing a broad suite of built-in features. If your hotel values a customizable system with minimal preloaded modules, Apaleo’s flexibility is key. But for a comprehensive, ready-to-use platform, Shiji’s rich feature library is unmatched.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Based on recent reviews, Apaleo’s support team scores a high 4.83/5, with many users praising its responsiveness and community engagement. Reviewers often mention that Apaleo’s support is quick, friendly, and helpful, making onboarding and troubleshooting smoother.
Shiji’s support, rated at 4.53/5, is also highly regarded, with users appreciating the helpfulness and professionalism of their support staff. However, some reviews mention slower responses during peak times and room for improvement in support responsiveness.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo leads with 120 verified partners, providing extensive options for connecting with revenue management, payment solutions, and other systems. Shared integrations include popular providers like SiteMinder, Revinate, and FLYR Hospitality. Its open API enables hotels to add custom integrations easily.
Shiji, with 64 verified partners, includes major industry players like Amadeus, Onity, and Goki. While it offers many integrations, the smaller partner count limits flexibility for custom or niche integrations.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s recent reviews are more numerous and current, with 29 reviews in the last six months, compared to Shiji’s 32 overall but none recent. Apaleo’s high NPS score of 9.69/5 and 97% likelihood to recommend reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among boutique and serviced apartment hotels.
Shiji’s reviews tend to focus on larger hotel groups, with a rating of 8.94/5 for likelihood to recommend, but no recent reviews to gauge current performance. Given the recency and volume of feedback, Apaleo’s ratings are more representative of current user sentiment.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo charges a base price of $900, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room fees, making it predictable and affordable for small to mid-sized hotels. Shiji’s base price is $1,200, which may include more modules but comes at a slightly higher upfront cost.
Pricing details for both products do not specify ongoing fees, but Apaleo’s lower base price combined with its flexible architecture suggests better value, especially for hotels seeking a modular setup.
Not ideal if you require a large, built-in feature suite from the start or need extensive out-of-the-box modules.
Not ideal if you prefer a modular, API-driven approach or have limited technical resources to manage complex integrations.
The core difference between Apaleo and Shiji is their approach: Apaleo offers a flexible, API-first system designed for customization, while Shiji provides a comprehensive, feature-packed platform for large-scale hotel operations. Both products support cloud-based management, but your choice depends on your hotel’s size, tech needs, and growth plans.
If your hotel values agility, customization, and lower initial costs, Apaleo is the clear choice. Its recent reviews confirm it’s well-liked for ease of use, support, and ongoing community engagement, making it the more current and highly-rated solution.
On the other hand, if you need a broad range of modules integrated into a single platform with extensive automation and reporting, Shiji’s larger feature set is advantageous. Its appeal is strongest among larger hotel groups that want a ready-made, unified management solution.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a flexible, modern PMS with recent positive feedback and active support, Apaleo stands out. It’s better suited for hotels aiming for lightweight customization and operational efficiency, whereas Shiji remains ideal for those needing a deep, all-encompassing system with extensive features.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Apaleo Open PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share 35 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 53 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing impro... The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing improvements. The active community provides a support network that enhances the user experience.
Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems t... Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems that align perfectly with their operational needs, enhancing efficiency and improving guest services.
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
Where hoteliers push back
While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current o... While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current options limited, leading to reliance on additional tools for deeper analytics.
Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehe... Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehensive functionality and intuitiveness.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Apaleo Open PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Apaleo Open PMS offers 120 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Apaleo Open PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Apaleo Open PMS: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. apaleo GmbH has an HT Score of 78 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor