The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 355 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines when it comes to ease of use and intuitive interface , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Clock shines when it comes to feature richness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Centralized Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 355 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 328 |
After analyzing 355 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while Clock users highlight feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #11 117 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #7 157 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #19 2 reviews | #11 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #8 165 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #11 80 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #8 62 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #48 1 reviews | #9 27 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | #17 30 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 228 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #27 1 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #17 2 reviews |
As you evaluate property management systems, your primary goal is to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experience, and offers reliable support. Both ASI PMS and Clock PMS aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right fit for your hotel’s current needs and growth plans.
ASI PMS, created by Anand Systems Inc., has been serving the hospitality industry for over 26 years and is used by over 7,000 hotels worldwide. Its focus on detailed customizations and deep reporting appeals to hotels seeking stability and comprehensive control. Conversely, Clock PMS boasts a broader feature set, faster innovation, and a higher user rating, making it more appealing for hotels that want an all-in-one, cloud-based solution that evolves rapidly.
What are the key factors that will determine the best PMS for your property? Let’s compare.
ASI PMS is a cloud-based platform designed for hotels that prioritize operational stability, detailed data, and robust reporting. Its strengths lie in its user-friendly interface, comprehensive reservation management, and solid customer support, with a focus on scalability and stability, especially for larger or multi-property hotels. However, it has fewer integrations—only 18 verified partners—and a higher price point at $300/month.
Clock PMS, on the other hand, is a feature-rich solution supporting everything from reservations and invoicing to guest messaging and event management. It is built for hotels that need a flexible, constantly improving platform with extensive integrations—over 111 verified partners—and a robust API. Clock tends to attract boutique hotels, hostels, and properties that value automation and guest engagement, with a recent higher rating at 84/100 and more recent reviews, indicating ongoing satisfaction and innovation.
Given their different focuses, your choice hinges on whether stability and simplicity or flexibility and innovation matter most.
If your hotel needs a highly stable, easy-to-learn PMS with proven reporting and support, ASI PMS is a strong candidate. It suits properties that value reliability, detailed analytics, and a straightforward onboarding process. Its all-in-one dashboard offers real-time inventory, rate control, and basic automation, ideal for hotels with predictable operations.
If your hotel requires a modern, customizable platform that adapts quickly to market changes, Clock PMS is preferable. It offers extensive features like online check-in, guest portals, and event management, alongside a proven API for integrations. Boutique hotels and properties with complex workflows will find Clock’s flexibility and frequent updates advantageous.
In summary, choose ASI if stability and detailed reporting are your priorities. Opt for Clock if you need innovation, automation, and a broad feature set.
ASI PMS scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.88/5 versus Clock’s 4.78/5, reflecting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users praise ASI for its user-friendly setup, especially for staff unfamiliar with hotel systems, and seamless daily operations.
Clock PMS, however, is praised for its simplicity and quick training—many users report that new employees can be up and running in no time. Its interface is designed for busy operations, with a focus on automating routine tasks and reducing manual input.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Clock PMS offers 45 shared features plus 13 unique functionalities, including EPoS, guest profiles, multi-currency, and online checkout, making it a comprehensive solution. It also supports guest apps, GDPR compliance, and employee messaging—features that are missing from ASI.
Meanwhile, ASI PMS has two exclusive features—on-premise deployment and guest communication via SMS—that may appeal to properties with specific needs. Its core strengths lie in reservation management, reporting, and multi-property scalability.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Both platforms are highly rated for support, but ASI’s support score is 4.73/5 with recent reviews praising its professionalism and quick resolution times. Users highlight prompt responses and effective troubleshooting, although some mention delays during high-volume periods.
Clock’s customer support scores 4.75/5, with reviewers noting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Many praise Clock for continuous improvements and proactive communication, contributing to smoother operations.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts a significantly larger ecosystem, with 111 verified integrations—including popular partners like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and TrustYou—versus ASI’s 18. Both systems share six common partners, but Clock’s extensive API facilitates customization and third-party extensions.
If your hotel relies heavily on integrations, automation, and third-party tools, Clock’s broader ecosystem offers more options and flexibility.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s overall rating is 84/100, with recent reviews confirming high satisfaction, especially among boutique hotels and properties focused on operational flexibility. Its recent reviews emphasize ongoing improvements and a wide feature set.
ASI’s rating is lower, at 77/100, and with only 26 reviews—most older—its score reflects stability but less recent positive momentum.
Edge: Clock PMS.
ASI PMS is priced at $300/month, offering a predictable fee for its comprehensive features. Clock PMS costs $600/month, reflecting its broader features, extensive integrations, and continuous updates.
Both follow a subscription model with no setup fees or hidden costs. Your choice depends on the value you place on features versus budget.
Hotels that benefit from ASI PMS typically:
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on third-party integrations or requires rapid feature updates.
Clock PMS is suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, minimal setup or has budget constraints that make the higher subscription less attractive.
Clock PMS stands out for its extensive features, rapid innovation, and large integration ecosystem, making it ideal for hotels that want a versatile, future-proof system. Its high user ratings and recent positive reviews reinforce its appeal for properties that prioritize automation, guest engagement, and flexibility.
ASI PMS offers a more traditional, stable solution focused on detailed reporting, ease of use, and multi-property management. It’s best suited for properties that value reliability, deep analytics, and a straightforward onboarding process, especially in larger or multi-location hotels.
Choose ASI if your hotel values stability, detailed data, and simplicity. Opt for Clock if you need a flexible, innovative system designed for rapid growth and complex operations.
This detailed comparison should help you confidently select the property management system that best fits your hotel's unique needs and vision.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and Clock PMS share 45 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 7 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and Clock PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while Clock PMS offers 111. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. Clock PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and Clock has 84. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor