The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines when it comes to ease of use and intuitive interface , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Online Check-in.
HotelRunner shines in onboarding , with exclusive features like Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 17 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while HotelRunner users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #38 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #44 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #34 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | #41 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #36 8 reviews |
| Luxury | #51 2 reviews | #38 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #47 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #48 1 reviews | #49 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | #36 2 reviews |
| Europe | — | #35 3 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #4 6 reviews |
Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and HotelRunner PMS depends on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge notably in features, user experience, and market presence. ASI, with over 26 years in the industry and more recent reviews, offers a comprehensive platform favored by a wide range of hotel segments. HotelRunner, newer to the market with a smaller review base, emphasizes affordability and ease of use, mainly appealing to boutique and independent hotels. Which system aligns better with your operational complexity and growth plans?
Both ASI and HotelRunner serve the core purpose of simplifying hotel management, but ASI’s extensive feature set and longer market history position it as a more mature solution. ASI’s cloud-based platform offers advanced tools like real-time status updates, automated space optimization, and detailed reporting—features that are absent from HotelRunner’s simpler interface. Conversely, HotelRunner is designed for straightforward implementation, with a focus on easy reservations management and channel integration.
ASI’s 26 reviews in the last six months, with an overall higher rating, reflect its continued relevance and active user base, especially in larger or multi-property hotels. HotelRunner’s reviews, all from recent months, highlight its ease of use and affordability but lack the depth and breadth of ASI’s feature set. If your team needs a scalable, detailed management system, ASI likely fits better. If simplicity and lower costs are priorities, HotelRunner could suffice.
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich PMS capable of managing complex reservations, rate management, and in-depth reporting, go with ASI. Its extensive toolset—such as automated reminders, online check-in, PCI compliance, and housekeeper mobile apps—serves larger or growing properties well. If your hotel primarily requires straightforward reservation handling, channel management, and basic guest management, HotelRunner’s simpler interface and lower price point make it a practical choice.
For hotels aiming to expand operations or improve operational efficiency with granular control, ASI's scalability and detailed analytics are advantageous. Conversely, boutique hotels or smaller properties seeking quick deployment and ease of use might find HotelRunner’s intuitive platform sufficient for their needs.
Both products boast high ratings for user-friendliness, with ASI scoring 4.88/5 and HotelRunner 4.81/5. ASI’s onboarding process receives a 4.69/5, and HotelRunner scores a perfect 5/5 for onboarding, reflecting their efforts to make setup straightforward. Reviews for ASI highlight its intuitive interface that simplifies daily operations, while HotelRunner’s users praise its ease of navigation and ongoing training support.
However, ASI’s more extensive feature set could present a steeper learning curve initially, especially for smaller teams. HotelRunner’s streamlined design and focus on core functionalities make it a more accessible choice for teams new to PMS systems. Edge: HotelRunner.
ASI outperforms HotelRunner significantly in features, with 19 unique functionalities such as transactional emails, automated space optimization, online check-in, ID scanning, and real-time reporting—none of which are offered by HotelRunner. HotelRunner’s single unique feature, mobile device notes and tasks, provides some convenience but lacks the depth found in ASI’s platform.
ASI’s broad feature set enables complex operations, automations, and integrations vital for larger hotels or those seeking comprehensive control over their property management. HotelRunner’s limited features may suffice for small properties but lack the advanced tools necessary for scaling. Edge: ASI.
Both products are rated highly for support, but ASI’s user reviews, with a support rating of 4.73/5, indicate prompt and professional assistance, although some users note delays. Users appreciate ASI’s technical team for resolving issues efficiently and providing helpful training, especially during onboarding.
HotelRunner achieves a perfect 5/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing ongoing training and responsiveness, particularly valued by newer or smaller teams. Given the more extensive user base and reviews, ASI’s support is more tested across diverse scenarios but HotelRunner’s dedicated support and easy communication make it a strong contender. Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s reviews reflect a perfect 5/5 rating, with hotel segments like boutique hotels, B&Bs, and independent properties praising its ease of use and support. The recent reviews from HotelRunner users highlight their satisfaction with the platform’s simplicity and ongoing training.
In contrast, ASI’s reviews, while positive, are fewer and more focused on specific features and technical support, with a 4.73/5 support rating. Its longer market presence and larger review count lend more credibility to its overall rating. Since recent reviews favor HotelRunner’s user experience, it holds a slight edge here, although ASI’s reliability remains highly regarded. Edge: HotelRunner.
ASI’s pricing starts at $300 per month, reflecting its more comprehensive offering. HotelRunner’s base price is $100 per month, making it more accessible for smaller hotels with simpler needs. Neither product offers a free trial or freemium model, but the price difference indicates ASI’s positioning as a premium platform with extensive features, whereas HotelRunner aims for affordability.
Your decision here hinges on budget versus feature requirements. Larger, feature-demanding properties will find value in ASI’s higher price, while smaller boutique hotels may prefer HotelRunner’s lower cost.
Hotels that should consider ASI PMS include:
Hotels that are prime candidates for HotelRunner include:
ASI PMS is a feature-rich, proven platform designed for larger hotels or those seeking detailed control and scalability. Its extensive set of tools supports complex operations, making it suitable for properties with diverse needs and growth ambitions. HotelRunner provides a straightforward, cost-effective solution ideal for smaller hotels or independent properties that value ease of use and quick implementation.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management system with advanced analytics, automation, and integrations, ASI is the clear choice. Conversely, if affordability, simplicity, and support are your primary concerns, HotelRunner will serve you well.
In summary, go with ASI if your hotel requires a scalable, feature-packed PMS capable of handling complex workflows. Choose HotelRunner if your focus is on ease of use, cost efficiency, and basic reservations management. Either way, your decision should align with your property’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and HotelRunner PMS share 28 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and HotelRunner PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while HotelRunner PMS offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. HotelRunner PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and HotelRunner has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor