The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 32 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ROI , with exclusive features like On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Lodgical Solution shines , with exclusive features like Guest Messaging and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Side-by-side ratings based on 32 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 5 |
After analyzing 32 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while Lodgical Solution users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #51 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #55 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #72 1 reviews | #58 2 reviews |
| Luxury | #51 2 reviews | #52 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #48 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | #30 5 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Lodgical Solution depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in features, regional presence, and user feedback. While ASI offers a more established platform with a broader feature set and recent reviews, Lodgical emphasizes simplicity and affordability for smaller properties. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
Both ASI PMS and Lodgical Solution are designed to improve your daily hotel operations, from reservations to billing. ASI’s comprehensive platform integrates advanced features like revenue management, multi-currency handling, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. Lodgical, however, focuses on ease of use with core functionalities that cater well to small and mid-sized properties. Do you prioritize a feature-rich system or a straightforward interface?
ASI PMS has a dedicated global presence with operations across multiple continents, reflecting its maturity and versatility. Lodgical, meanwhile, is concentrated mainly in North America and is better suited for properties seeking a cost-effective, simple management tool. If you need a system with a proven track record and extensive capabilities, ASI is compelling. Would your hotel benefit from a more scalable, feature-heavy solution?
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS with detailed reporting, multi-lingual support, and extensive integrations, go with ASI. Its reviews highlight a user-friendly interface, reliable technical support, and a strong feature set, especially for larger or multi-property hotels aiming for growth. Conversely, if your property values simplicity, affordability, and quick onboarding, Lodgical offers a streamlined management system with vital features suitable for small to mid-sized hotels and resorts. What’s more aligned with your operational priorities?
For hotels that require advanced tools like automated night audits, revenue management, and multi-currency handling, ASI’s comprehensive capabilities make it the better fit. If your team prefers an intuitive system that minimizes tech headaches and emphasizes guest satisfaction, Lodgical might be the more appropriate choice. Which set of features will support your long-term goals?
Both systems are highly rated for ease of use, with ASI scoring 4.88/5 and Lodgical slightly ahead at 4.8/5. ASI’s interface is praised for its user-friendliness, especially in front desk operations, with many users mentioning how quickly staff can learn and adapt to the system. Lodgical’s interface is similarly intuitive, emphasizing simplicity and straightforward workflows, which is ideal for smaller teams or properties without dedicated IT staff.
Onboarding experiences for both are rated very highly, at 4.69/5 for ASI and 4.67/5 for Lodgical, reflecting smooth implementation processes. Staff adoption for either platform tends to be seamless, but ASI’s recent review count and overall ratings suggest a slightly more mature user experience. Edge: ASI.
ASI offers a richer feature set, with 21 features exclusive to its platform. Notable among these are multi-lingual support, cloud and on-premise deployment options, automated space optimization, ID & passport scanners, real-time reporting, revenue management, and mobile apps—features that cater to larger, complex properties.
Lodgical provides only three features unique to its platform, including guest messaging, online checkout, and mobile device notes & tasks. While these cater to small hotels seeking simplicity, they lack advanced revenue and operational tools found in ASI. Overall, ASI’s feature depth and versatility give it a clear advantage. Edge: ASI.
Both products score well on support, with ASI receiving a 4.73/5 rating and Lodgical 4.6/5. Reviewers highlight ASI’s quick response times and professional assistance, with one praising its “responsive and efficient support,” although some mention delays. Lodgical is appreciated for its friendly staff, especially in onboarding, with reviews noting “local humans” who “understand my problems,” and consistent support.
However, ASI’s larger user base and recent review count suggest a more tested support system. You can expect reliable, responsive help from either, but ASI’s slightly higher ratings and recent reviews make it the more dependable choice. Edge: ASI.
ASI boasts 18 verified integration partners, including key players like SHR Group, SiteMinder, and Cendyn, offering extensive connectivity for reservations, revenue, and distribution. Lodgical Solution has 20 verified partners, including RateBoard and GuestCentric, with some exclusive integrations tailored for smaller properties.
Shared integrations include industry staples like Duetto and Vertical Booking. If your hotel relies heavily on third-party systems, ASI’s broader network and advanced integrations can support complex ecosystems. Lodgical’s integrations are sufficient for basic operations but may limit scalability. Edge: Lodgical.
ASI’s reviews, with 26 recent, highly-rated comments, show a 97% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong satisfaction across all segments. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, detailed reporting, and support, especially in larger properties and multi-property environments.
Lodgical has only five reviews, without recent data, making it harder to gauge current satisfaction levels. The few available ratings are positive but lack the depth and volume to compete with ASI’s proven track record. For hoteliers seeking a trusted, well-reviewed system, ASI stands out. Edge: ASI.
ASI PMS’s base price is $300, with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room charges, and no implementation fee. This transparent pricing simplifies budgeting for larger hotels or chains considering scalability.
Lodgical does not publicly disclose specific pricing, which could mean variable costs based on property size or custom features. Its absence of clear pricing may be suitable for smaller hotels with tight budgets but could be a concern for larger properties needing precise budgets. Overall, ASI’s straightforward pricing offers more certainty for planning.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or prefers a very simple management system without many advanced features.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to grow significantly, requires extensive customization, or needs advanced operational features.
In summary, ASI PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, proven reliability, and a large, satisfied user base. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it the clear choice for larger or growing hotels seeking advanced tools and scalability.
Lodgical Solution, on the other hand, provides a straightforward, affordable PMS ideal for small hotels or properties looking for ease of use without complex features. Its limited feature set and regional focus may restrict growth but suit properties prioritizing simplicity.
If your hotel needs a dependable, scalable system with detailed reporting and integrations, choose ASI. If you want an easy-to-use solution for a smaller property, Lodgical can meet your needs at a lower cost. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, growth plans, and operational complexity.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and Lodgical Solution share 26 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and Lodgical Solution share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while Lodgical Solution offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. Lodgical Solution: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and Lodgical Solution has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property