The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 27 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Roombler shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 27 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 0 |
After analyzing 27 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while Roombler users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #72 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #51 2 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #48 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Anand Systems Inc.’s ASI PMS and Roombler both aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve very different hotel profiles and operational needs. While ASI offers a feature-rich, scalable platform with extensive integrations, Roombler emphasizes simplicity and mobility for small accommodation owners. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
ASI PMS is designed to serve larger hotels and multi-property operators, providing comprehensive tools for reservations, rate management, housekeeping, and detailed reporting. It’s a cloud-based platform with extensive integrations, suitable for hotels seeking central control and scalability. Roombler, on the other hand, is tailored for small accommodation owners, offering an intuitive app that manages bookings and guest stays from a mobile device. It’s ideal for hosts looking for simplicity and on-the-go management. Do you need a robust platform with deep features or a lightweight app for daily tasks?
If your hotel requires advanced automation, multi-property management, and integrations with platforms like SiteMinder or Duetto, ASI PMS is the clear choice. Its 26 reviews in the last six months with a 97% likelihood to recommend highlight its recent stability and user satisfaction. Conversely, if you manage a small property, vacation rental, or bed-and-breakfast, and value mobility and ease of use, Roombler’s app-based approach may suffice, although it has no recent reviews to back its performance. Is your focus on scale and automation or simplicity and flexibility?
ASI PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.88/5, driven by its intuitive interface, streamlined workflows, and supportive onboarding process. Reviewers praise it as "user-friendly" and "easy to teach to new staff," which minimizes training time. Roombler’s user experience is not rated or reviewed, but its app-based design suggests a straightforward interface for small-scale management. However, without recent user feedback, it's harder to gauge its usability in comparison. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS offers 47 features, including multi-lingual support, centralized user management, online check-in, integrated payment processing, channel management, revenue and rate management, and extensive reporting tools. These features cater to medium and large hotels requiring comprehensive operational control. Roombler provides basic booking and guest management via its mobile app, lacking the depth found in ASI’s system. Given the feature count, ASI’s platform is more suitable for hotels with complex needs. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS has an average support rating of 4.73/5, with users describing the support team as “responsive,” “knowledgeable,” and “professional.” Recent reviews note prompt resolution of technical issues and effective onboarding, supporting a positive user experience. Roombler’s support and review scores are unavailable, which makes it difficult to assess. For hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support, ASI’s established reputation offers more confidence. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS integrates with 18 verified partners, including major channel managers, booking engines, and revenue tools like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across booking and financial platforms. Roombler has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems. Larger hotels or chains that rely on multiple platforms will benefit from ASI’s extensive integration options. Edge: ASI PMS.
While ASI PMS has a substantial review volume with 26 recent reviews and a 97% likelihood to recommend, Roombler has no reviews or ratings available. This suggests that ASI’s user base is active and satisfied, especially in the medium-to-large hotel segment. Small accommodation owners considering Roombler lack recent feedback to evaluate its performance. For reliability and proven satisfaction, ASI PMS stands out. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS costs a flat $300 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, offering transparent pricing for hotels seeking a complete PMS solution. Roombler’s pricing details are unavailable, making direct comparison difficult. Given ASI’s clear pricing model and feature set, it provides predictable value for investment. If Roombler’s costs are comparable, it might be appealing for very small operations; if not, ASI’s value-focused pricing makes it a safer choice.
Not ideal if you run a small, single-room operation without complex needs or prefer a mobile app for on-the-go management.
Not ideal if your property is part of a larger chain, requires extensive integrations, or needs sophisticated revenue management and reporting.
ASI PMS offers a comprehensive, scalable platform with nearly 50 features, extensive integrations, and a proven track record supported by recent, positive reviews. It’s best suited for larger hotels or chains seeking automation, detailed reporting, and multi-property management. Its high user satisfaction and support ratings make it a dependable choice for operational stability and growth.
Roombler emphasizes simplicity and mobility, ideal for small accommodation owners who want a straightforward app for daily management. Its lack of recent reviews and limited feature set make it less suitable for hotels with complex needs or growth ambitions.
If your hotel is a medium to large property or plans to expand, choose ASI PMS for its depth and reliability. Small operators seeking quick, mobile management should evaluate Roombler, but with caution due to the lack of recent feedback.
In summary, for most hotels looking for a proven, feature-rich PMS that can grow with their business, ASI PMS is the clear choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Roombler
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and Roombler share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 35 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Roombler
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and Roombler share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while Roombler offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. Roombler: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and Roombler has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property