The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 60 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines .
Counter shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 60 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 57 |
After analyzing 60 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #60 1 reviews | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #54 0 reviews | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | #67 0 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #64 0 reviews | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining your hotel's operations, improving guest experiences, and increasing revenue. Both AutoClerk and Counter aim to serve distinct segments—AutoClerk primarily targets independent hotels and chains, while Counter is tailored specifically for hostels and budget accommodations. They address core operational needs but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Which fits your hotel’s specific requirements better?
AutoClerk offers a broad, flexible platform with a focus on revenue management, guest profiles, and integrations, but it has a limited review base and less recent feedback. Counter, meanwhile, benefits from a larger, more recent review pool, especially among hostel operators, and emphasizes ease of use and automation. Do you prioritize proven stability and extensive feature sets or prefer a lighter, more mobile-friendly system?
AutoClerk provides a comprehensive PMS solution suitable for independent properties, hotel groups, and resorts. It offers integrated revenue management, guest loyalty, and detailed reporting, catering to hotels seeking robust operational tools. Counter, on the other hand, is a free, streamlined system designed for hostels and small properties, focusing on check-in/out, reservations, and automation, making it ideal for budget accommodations.
AutoClerk’s strengths lie in its ability to handle complex property configurations and integrations with third-party tools, but it has a limited user base and fewer recent reviews, which raises questions about ongoing support and innovation. Counter’s advantage is its high user satisfaction, especially among hostel operators, with 52 recent reviews averaging 4.75/5, but it lacks advanced revenue management and extensive reporting features.
The choice hinges on your property type: Does your hotel need a feature-rich, scalable solution with advanced revenue tools? Or do you prioritize simplicity, automation, and mobile accessibility? Which factors weigh more heavily on your decision?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich PMS capable of handling multiple properties, revenue management, and integrations with complex systems, AutoClerk is the better choice. Its suite includes guest profiles, loyalty programs, and customizable reporting, suited for resorts and chains that prioritize data and operational control.
Conversely, if you manage a hostel or small property where ease of use, automation, and cost are key, Counter is preferable. Its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and automation features support day-to-day hostel operations efficiently, especially for owners seeking a low-cost, straightforward system.
Hotels that focus on large-scale operations, revenue optimization, and detailed analytics should lean toward AutoClerk. Small or hostel-style accommodations looking for simplicity and automation should choose Counter. Which features align with your property’s current needs?
AutoClerk’s ease of use is rated at 4.33/5, with support praised for quick resolution times—support staff are available 24/7 and highly responsive. Reviews mention the interface could use design improvements, but overall, users find it easy to learn and teach.
Counter scores slightly higher at 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface that minimizes staff training. Users appreciate its straightforward navigation, especially for managing check-ins and reservations on the go.
Edge: Counter.
AutoClerk’s features include revenue forecasting, guest loyalty, and customizable reports, but it offers zero unique features beyond core property management. Counter boasts 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, POS, group booking, multi-currency, and multi-lingual support—many tailored explicitly for hostel operations.
Counter’s comprehensive feature set supports automating tasks like contactless check-in, online payments, and inventory management, which are less prominent in AutoClerk. If your hotel needs advanced revenue management and third-party integrations, AutoClerk leads. For operational automation and multi-platform management, Counter excels.
Edge: Counter.
AutoClerk’s support scores at 4.33/5, with reviews highlighting 24/7 availability and quick issue resolution. However, some users describe the interface as dated, and limited recent reviews make it hard to gauge current support responsiveness.
Counter outperforms with a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews consistently praising its quick, helpful support staff, especially during recent updates. Hoteliers appreciate the proactive approach, with comments like “support is always there to help” and “Evelyn and Max are super helpful,” indicating a more responsive support experience.
Edge: Counter.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including SiteMinder and Duetto, primarily catering to larger or multi-property hotels. Counter has 7 verified integrations, with popular platforms like Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds, focusing on hostel and small property needs.
Both systems support essential third-party services, but AutoClerk’s larger ecosystem indicates a broader range of enterprise-level integrations. Counter’s integrations are more focused on automation and POS systems, fitting hostels that rely on multiple digital tools.
Edge: AutoClerk.
AutoClerk has a total review count of 3, all from independent hoteliers, with an average rating of 3.5/5. Recent reviews are scarce, and support and interface feedback point to room for improvement, especially for larger or chain properties.
Counter, with 54 reviews, enjoys an average rating of 4.73/5, with most recent feedback praising usability, automation, and support. Hostel operators consistently recommend Counter, citing its ease of use and automation features as key benefits.
Edge: Counter.
AutoClerk does not list specific pricing details publicly, indicating a customized quote based on property size and needs. It typically targets larger or chain hotels willing to invest in a comprehensive platform.
Counter is free and has no upfront costs, appealing to small hostels and budget hotels. Additional paid features or integrations may exist, but the core platform is accessible at no charge.
In summary, AutoClerk’s costs are likely higher, with tailored pricing, while Counter’s free base offers a low entry point but may have paid add-ons.
Not ideal if you’re a small hostel or budget property seeking simplicity and low-cost solutions.
Not ideal if you need advanced revenue management, detailed analytics, or complex multi-property features.
AutoClerk offers a broad, feature-rich PMS suitable for larger, complex hotels and chains that value integrations and revenue management. Its limited recent reviews make it less appealing for properties seeking recent support insights but it remains a solid choice for established, data-driven operations.
Counter provides a highly rated, user-friendly platform ideal for hostels and small properties prioritizing automation, simplicity, and mobile accessibility. With a large volume of recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings, it’s the preferred choice for budget accommodations and boutique hostels.
If your property demands extensive features, advanced analytics, and multi-system integrations, AutoClerk is the safer option. Conversely, if you seek an easy-to-use, low-cost solution with excellent support for daily hostel operations, Counter is likely to serve you better.
In conclusion, the decision depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational needs. For larger, data-driven hotels, AutoClerk’s suite is compelling. For small, agile properties focused on automation and guest experience, Counter’s simplicity and recent high ratings make it the clear winner.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (PMS) and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (PMS) and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (PMS) offers 8 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (PMS): No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor