The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines .
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 105 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while Sirvoy users highlight customer support, ease of use, reservation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #22 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #48 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #54 0 reviews | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #29 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #37 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #64 0 reviews | #42 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #23 16 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining your hotel’s operations, managing reservations, and enhancing guest experiences. AutoClerk offers a long-standing, feature-rich solution with a limited review base but high support ratings, while Sirvoy provides a more recent, highly rated platform with extensive features and a broad user base. Your decision hinges on your hotel's size, complexity, and need for advanced features versus ease of use and support.
AutoClerk aims to serve independent hotels and chains seeking integrated revenue tools and big-picture data, but its limited recent reviews make evaluating its current performance challenging. Sirvoy, on the other hand, is backed by over 95 recent reviews and a high NPS score, making it a more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
AutoClerk and Sirvoy both address core hotel management needs like reservations, guest profiles, and integrated payments. However, AutoClerk has historically focused on larger properties or chains with complex needs, offering advanced revenue management, data analytics, and extensive third-party integrations. Sirvoy emphasizes simplicity, affordability, and ease of use, catering primarily to small and medium-sized properties such as B&Bs, hostels, and boutique hotels.
AutoClerk’s interface has been noted as somewhat outdated but supports web- and Windows-based systems, providing flexibility for larger operations that need detailed reporting and multi-channel management. Sirvoy’s cloud-based system is praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and excellent customer support, making it well-suited for teams that prioritize straightforward tools and prompt assistance.
Given recent reviews, Sirvoy’s higher customer satisfaction and more active user feedback suggest it’s the stronger choice today. Are you prioritizing a robust, scalable system with detailed analytics or a simple, user-friendly platform with excellent support?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, customizable PMS capable of supporting multiple properties, detailed revenue management, and extensive third-party integrations, AutoClerk is the better fit. It has the advantage of a long-established presence, with integrated revenue tools, guest management, and a focus on larger or chain hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel values ease of use, quick onboarding, and excellent customer support, Sirvoy is the clear winner. It’s ideal for small to medium properties seeking a straightforward cloud system with strong booking, channel management, and a dedicated support team, at a more accessible price point.
For properties with high complexity and multi-channel distribution needs, AutoClerk offers the benefit of advanced analytics and integrations. For those seeking simplicity and a fast setup, Sirvoy’s recent high review scores and ease of use make it the more sensible choice.
AutoClerk’s user ratings reflect a 4.33/5 score for ease of use, but reviews note that its interface could benefit from a visual refresh and more intuitive navigation. Onboarding is generally rated well at 4.33/5, and support is praised for around-the-clock responsiveness, often resolving issues on the first call.
Sirvoy scores slightly higher at 4.64/5 for ease of use, with users emphasizing its straightforward, clean interface that’s easy for staff to learn and operate. Recent reviews highlight quick onboarding, responsive support, and minimal training time required.
Edge: Sirvoy.
AutoClerk’s core strengths lie in its integrated revenue management, big-picture reporting, and flexible property configurations, but its feature set remains more basic compared to Sirvoy. It does not list specific features beyond reservation and guest management, and its interface is less modern.
Sirvoy offers 43 unique features including multi-lingual support, channel management, online booking engine, guest messaging, automated reminders, integrated payment processing, and mobile check-in. These features support a broad range of operational needs and are frequently updated.
Edge: Sirvoy.
AutoClerk maintains a support rating of 4.33/5, with reviews highlighting 24/7 availability and quick resolution times. Support agents are praised for returning calls promptly and resolving issues efficiently, but limited recent reviews make it hard to gauge current performance.
Sirvoy’s support rating of 4.85/5 is backed by a large volume of recent reviews, with users describing their experience as “excellent,” “super quick,” and “helpful.” Many mention that support staff go above and beyond, even offering personalized help beyond the system.
Edge: Sirvoy.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partner systems, including well-known solutions like SHR Group, Actabl, and Duetto. Its integrations cover essential revenue and third-party booking systems, but its partner network is considerably smaller than Sirvoy’s.
Sirvoy boasts 21 verified integrations, with shared partners such as SiteMinder and Cendyn, plus a wide array of additional booking channels, payment providers, and marketing tools like Cloudbeds, Tripadvisor, and TrustYou. This extensive network supports more scalable and flexible property operations.
Edge: Sirvoy.
AutoClerk’s total review count is only 3, with an overall rating of 3.5/5. The limited feedback, mostly from small hotels, suggests moderate satisfaction but little recent validation. Its support and usability are appreciated but not enough to outweigh the sparse reviews.
Sirvoy has 95 reviews in the past six months, with a high overall rating of 83.93/100 and a 94% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across various segments—hostels, B&Bs, boutique hotels—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and value.
Edge: Sirvoy.
AutoClerk does not list a clear pricing model or trial information, suggesting a custom quote based on property size and needs. Its pricing structure likely targets larger hotels with more complex requirements.
Sirvoy charges a straightforward fee of $200/month with no trial or implementation fees, making it accessible for smaller and medium-sized properties. Its transparent pricing and positive ROI feedback from users support its affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or prefers a simple, plug-and-play system that’s easy to learn and operate.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, extensive reporting, or complex integrations with legacy systems.
AutoClerk and Sirvoy serve different hotel profiles, with AutoClerk focusing on larger, more complex operations and Sirvoy catering to smaller, user-friendly needs. AutoClerk’s strengths lie in its detailed data tools and customization options, but its limited recent reviews make it less reliable for current performance.
Sirvoy stands out with its high user ratings, extensive feature set, and responsive support, making it the more dependable choice for most hoteliers today. If your property is small, values simplicity, and wants excellent customer service, Sirvoy is clearly the better option.
Choose AutoClerk if you need a highly customizable system with advanced revenue tools and multi-property support. Opt for Sirvoy if you prioritize ease of use, quick setup, and ongoing support in a cost-effective package.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (PMS) and Sirvoy share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (PMS) and Sirvoy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (PMS) offers 8 verified integration partners, while Sirvoy offers 21. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (PMS): No. Sirvoy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and Sirvoy has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor