The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 127 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Aven Hospitality shines when it comes to integration and connectivity — especially for independent properties (3.4/5) , with exclusive features like Urgency messaging.
HotelRunner shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Pooled inventory and Gift Vouchers.
Side-by-side ratings based on 127 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 86 | 41 |
After analyzing 127 verified reviews, Aven Hospitality users most value its integration and connectivity, revenue optimization, account management, while HotelRunner users highlight customer support, ease of use, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Connectivity
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Revenue Optimization
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Account Management
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
Learning Curve and Usability
▾
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
−
Reporting Features
▾
|
|
−
System Performance and Stability
▾
|
|
|
−
Innovation and Development Pace
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 10 reviews | #19 16 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 34 reviews | #29 9 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 26 reviews | #31 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #8 10 reviews | #25 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 42 reviews | #18 22 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 53 reviews | #28 9 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 33 reviews | #31 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #15 10 reviews | #33 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 48 reviews | #26 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #25 12 reviews | #22 12 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #12 15 reviews | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #12 5 reviews | #1 16 reviews |
Choosing between Aven Hospitality’s Booking Engine and HotelRunner’s Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to increase direct bookings and simplify reservation management, but they approach this goal differently—Aven with its focus on integration and detailed reporting, HotelRunner emphasizing ease of use and extensive channel management. Your decision should consider factors like the size of your property, desired features, and support quality.
While both platforms deliver solid solutions, the product with more recent reviews and a higher review count is HotelRunner. Its 40 reviews, with 4 in the last six months, provide fresher, more representative data, making it the stronger choice for most hoteliers now.
Both products serve as booking engines designed to boost reservations, yet they diverge in their core strengths. Aven Hospitality emphasizes connectivity, detailed analytics, and advanced rate management, suited for hotels seeking granular control and revenue optimization. HotelRunner, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and broad channel integration, ideal for properties that want to streamline operations without complexity.
If your hotel needs robust connectivity, such as integration with numerous third-party partners or detailed reporting, Aven Hospitality may be more suitable. Conversely, if your priority is a straightforward platform with strong channel management and rapid setup, HotelRunner offers a more accessible solution.
Do you need advanced analytics and customization, or is simplicity and speed more critical?
If your hotel requires a sophisticated platform that integrates with multiple partners and offers extensive reporting, Aven Hospitality is the right fit. Its 77 reviews, including recent ones, show consistent satisfaction with connectivity, revenue tools, and report capabilities, making it better suited for larger or more complex properties.
For hotels that value user-friendliness, fast onboarding, and a high-rated customer support experience, HotelRunner is the superior option. Its 40 reviews, with recent positive feedback, demonstrate a platform favored by boutique hotels and smaller properties looking for efficiency and simplicity.
If your focus is complex integrations and data-driven decisions, go with Aven. If you want quick deployment and reliable support, HotelRunner is the better choice.
HotelRunner’s ease of use shines with a rating of 4.73/5, supported by reviews praising its user-friendly interface, fast setup, and straightforward management. Reviewers mention that the platform is "very user-friendly" and "easy to handle," even for those with limited technical knowledge, and support is described as prompt and helpful, including via WhatsApp.
Aven Hospitality scores 4.38/5, with reviews indicating it is easy to navigate but with a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive features. Users commend their onboarding process but note that initial navigation can be challenging.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Aven Hospitality offers 3 exclusive features: urgency messaging, Facebook conversion tracking, and Apple Pay, catering to direct engagement and modern payment options. It also provides a total of 30 shared features that cover core booking functionalities.
HotelRunner offers 10 unique features, including pooled inventory, gift vouchers, website integration, social media bookings, and booking abandonment recapture, which enhance marketing and operational flexibility. It also maintains 30 shared features similar to Aven.
Edge: HotelRunner, for its broader range of specialized features.
HotelRunner’s customer support shines with a rating of 4.8/5, and reviewers consistently commend its responsiveness, mentioning quick answers via WhatsApp and proactive support. Many users describe their support as "very responsive" and "helpful," which significantly aids their daily management.
Aven Hospitality’s support scores 3.82/5, with some reviews citing delays and limited responsiveness. While some users appreciate their account managers, overall support appears less reliable and slower than HotelRunner’s.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Aven Hospitality touts 80 verified partners, including major names like Oracle Hospitality, Inntopia, and Profitroom, offering extensive integration options. Shared integrations include industry-standard systems like WebRezPro and WebRezPro, with many niche and regional partners filling out its ecosystem.
HotelRunner has 17 verified partners, featuring popular OTAs such as Expedia, Agoda, Airbnb, and Stripe. While its partner count is lower, it covers essential channels and offers reliable integration for most hotels.
Edge: Aven Hospitality.
HotelRunner’s overall rating of 4.5/5 surpasses Aven Hospitality’s 3.68/5, reflecting stronger user satisfaction. Recent reviews highlight HotelRunner’s reliability, ease of use, and support, especially among boutique hotels and small properties.
Aven Hospitality’s reviews are less recent—only 1 in the last six months—and contain mixed sentiments, with some users praising its analytics but others citing support and connectivity issues. The higher rating and recent feedback favor HotelRunner.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Aven Hospitality’s pricing starts at $600 monthly, with no freemium or trial options available, positioning it as a premium solution. In contrast, HotelRunner’s base price is $100 per month, making it more accessible for smaller hotels and properties with tighter budgets.
Neither platform offers free trials, so direct comparison depends on your hotel's willingness to invest in a more expensive, feature-rich solution versus an affordable, streamlined platform.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Aven Hospitality’s Booking Engine excels in connectivity, analytics, and advanced features, making it ideal for larger hotels or brands that want data-driven control. Its higher cost reflects its broader capabilities, suited for properties with complex operational needs.
HotelRunner offers a highly rated, user-friendly platform with strong channel management, making it perfect for boutique hotels, small properties, and those new to online distribution. Its lower price point and recent reviews confirm its relevance for hoteliers seeking simplicity and reliable support.
If your property needs detailed integrations and analytics, choose Aven Hospitality. If quick deployment, ease of use, and broad channel access are more important, HotelRunner is the better fit.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers actively evaluating these two, the recent review count and higher overall ratings for HotelRunner make it the recommended choice right now.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Aven Hospitality Booking Engine and Booking Engine by HotelRunner share 30 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Apple Pay | ||
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Social Media Integration/Bookings | ||
| Urgency messaging | ||
| Website Integration |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend Sabre/Synxis for its seamless integration capabilities with other systems like PMS and RMS, and robust connectivity with mult... Users frequently commend Sabre/Synxis for its seamless integration capabilities with other systems like PMS and RMS, and robust connectivity with multiple OTA channels. This integration ensures accurate data flow, reducing manual work and preventing overbooking while enhancing distribution reach.
The booking engine offered by Sabre/Synxis is praised for its efficiency, ease of use, and ability to handle complex configurations. It's optimized fo... The booking engine offered by Sabre/Synxis is praised for its efficiency, ease of use, and ability to handle complex configurations. It's optimized for mobile and allows hoteliers to make real-time updates. However, some reviews mention room for improvement in customization options and quicker implementation of user-requested enhancements.
Sabre/Synxis provides tools for creating new rates and promotions which help in maximizing bookings across channels. The flexibility in creating prici... Sabre/Synxis provides tools for creating new rates and promotions which help in maximizing bookings across channels. The flexibility in creating pricing strategies and real-time updates on rates significantly contributes to revenue growth.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a common critical point. While some users appreciate the support staff's dedication and responsiveness, many reviews report delays... Customer support is a common critical point. While some users appreciate the support staff's dedication and responsiveness, many reviews report delays in issue resolution and a perceived lack of expertise among support agents, which can significantly impact operations.
Users appreciate the customization flexibility that Sabre/Synxis offers, from configuration of rate plans to booking engine design. However, they also... Users appreciate the customization flexibility that Sabre/Synxis offers, from configuration of rate plans to booking engine design. However, they also highlight that certain areas, such as report customization and adding new features, need improvement to meet specific hotel requirements.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, inc... Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, including WhatsApp.
The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied tec... The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied technical expertise.
Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double... Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double bookings and simplifies inventory management.
Where hoteliers push back
The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of... The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of creating OTAs listings, contributing to increased occupancy and revenues.
Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future imp... Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future improvement.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Aven Hospitality Booking Engine and Booking Engine by HotelRunner share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Aven Hospitality Booking Engine offers 80 verified integration partners, while Booking Engine by HotelRunner offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Booking Engine by HotelRunner leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Aven Hospitality Booking Engine: No. Booking Engine by HotelRunner: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Aven Hospitality has an HT Score of 73 and HotelRunner has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor