The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ayenda shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, Ayenda users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Ayenda |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, revenue, and guest experience. You’re weighing Ayenda by Ayenda and RoomRaccoon PMS, both designed to streamline hospitality management, but they differ markedly in features, scale, and user reception. Having evaluated recent reviews, feature sets, and market presence, it’s clear RoomRaccoon’s more extensive and current user feedback makes it the stronger choice for most hoteliers.
Both products aim to automate tasks like reservations, check-ins, and guest communication, but RoomRaccoon offers a robust, all-in-one platform with a broad partner network. Will your hotel benefit more from a comprehensive system with proven scalability, or is a smaller, less integrated solution sufficient?
Ayenda by Ayenda is a hotel-specific PMS designed primarily for Latin American markets, aiming to consolidate management tasks into a single interface. However, its poor ratings—0/5 overall and no recent reviews—highlight significant usability and support issues.
In contrast, RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.88/5 rating based on 169 reviews, with recent feedback showing high satisfaction. Its ease of use (4.74/5) and customer support (4.53/5) indicate a mature, user-centric platform. The stark difference in user ratings underscores RoomRaccoon’s reliability and ongoing support, making it the more dependable choice.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
If your hotel needs an integrated PMS with channel management, booking engine, and automation, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set—over 51 unique functionalities—supports small to medium-sized hotels seeking to automate reservations, revenue management, guest communications, and reporting from a single platform.
Ayenda, with no verified integrations or features listed, appears limited in scope and adaptability. For hotels aiming for operational efficiency, revenue growth, and a future-proof system, RoomRaccoon’s broad capabilities and proven track record make it the better pick.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon consistently receives high marks for usability, with a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating and positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Reviews highlight how staff quickly learn and adopt the system, reducing training time and errors.
Ayenda’s usability is not documented or rated favorably, and the lack of recent reviews suggests limited user feedback or support. Given the well-documented user-friendly design of RoomRaccoon, it’s the clear choice for hotels prioritizing ease of adoption.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon offers a comprehensive suite with 51 features, including channel management, revenue optimization, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile app, online check-in, and automated night audits. Its features support full operational automation and revenue growth.
Ayenda’s feature list remains unspecified, and reviews do not highlight specific capabilities, implying limited functionality. For hotels wanting advanced tools and automation—especially in revenue management, guest engagement, and multi-channel distribution—RoomRaccoon’s extensive feature set is unmatched.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon earns a 4.53/5 support rating, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness—even during challenging times. Users appreciate the proactive assistance and clear communication, which help ensure smooth operations.
Ayenda’s support reputation is not documented, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or effectiveness. The absence of recent feedback combined with RoomRaccoon’s well-rated support makes the latter the safer choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing assistance.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment systems, and revenue tools, providing a flexible ecosystem. These integrations streamline operations, reduce manual data entry, and enhance automation.
Ayenda’s integration count is zero, limiting its ability to connect with other systems and requiring manual processes. For hotels that rely on seamless integrations to operate efficiently, RoomRaccoon’s extensive partner network is a significant advantage.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews consistently reflect high satisfaction, with a 4.88/5 rating and a 94% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of varied sizes, especially small independent properties, praise its ease of use, automation, and revenue tools.
Ayenda’s reviews are nonexistent or unverified, and the overall rating of zero signals very poor perception or lack of user engagement. For property operators seeking proven performance and positive peer feedback, RoomRaccoon clearly leads.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
Ayenda’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be a free or custom-priced product, but the lack of transparency raises questions about value and support. Conversely, RoomRaccoon charges a base fee of $1,000 per month, with no additional fees for integrations or features, offering clear pricing for budgeting.
Without transparent pricing, it's challenging to compare value directly. However, given RoomRaccoon’s extensive features and recent positive reviews, its cost appears justified for hotels seeking a comprehensive PMS solution.
Given its limited features and review base, Ayenda is better suited for very small, localized operations with simple management requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel is a large property needing a more complex, enterprise-level PMS with advanced features beyond RoomRaccoon’s scope.
The core difference is that RoomRaccoon offers a full-featured, highly-rated cloud PMS with ongoing support, integrations, and proven peer success stories. Ayenda, on the other hand, appears limited in scope, lacking recent reviews, integrations, and a clear feature set, making it less suitable for hotels seeking operational automation.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable system that enhances revenue and guest experience, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice—especially given its recent reviews, extensive features, and broad integration network.
Choose RoomRaccoon for proven performance, ease of use, and ongoing support. Opt for Ayenda only if your operation is very small, very localized, and your primary concern is a minimal or free management solution in Latin America, understanding its limited capabilities.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Ayenda |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Ayenda and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Ayenda |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ayenda and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ayenda offers 0 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ayenda: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ayenda has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor