The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 25 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
b4feedback by b4checkin shines .
Loopon shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Flexible role based reporting and Mobile Access.
Side-by-side ratings based on 25 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 25 |
After analyzing 25 verified reviews, b4feedback by b4checkin users most value its , while Loopon users highlight ease of use, feedback collection and analysis, customer support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
b4feedback by b4checkin
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Feedback Collection and Analysis
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Notification and Alerts
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
User Administration
▾
|
|
|
−
Comparative Metrics
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Survey Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
b4feedback by b4checkin
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #4 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #4 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
b4feedback by b4checkin
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 10 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 6 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #6 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
b4feedback by b4checkin
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #5 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 19 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 0 reviews |
Choosing the right guest feedback software for your hotel can significantly influence guest satisfaction and operational improvements. Both b4feedback by b4checkin and Loopon Post Stay aim to streamline guest surveys and enhance service quality, but they approach these goals differently. While b4feedback offers a basic platform with no recent reviews or extensive features, Loopon provides a more comprehensive, widely adopted solution with active user engagement. Which platform better suits your hotel’s needs?
b4feedback by b4checkin is a guest feedback system designed to collect targeted online surveys and analyze guest comments efficiently. It emphasizes instant feedback management with automatic email notifications, but its lack of recent reviews and zero verified integrations suggest it’s less proven in today’s market. Loopon Post Stay, on the other hand, is a well-reviewed, feature-rich system with 25 recent reviews, a 4.46/5 overall rating, and active customer feedback, indicating a stronger market presence.
Loopon’s recent reviews praise its user-friendliness, quick support, and detailed analytics, making it a more reliable choice for hotels aiming for actionable insights. Is your hotel seeking a system with proven market adoption and ongoing user support? If yes, Loopon is the clear choice.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-packed survey platform with strong integration capabilities, go with Loopon. Its 24 unique features—including in-app call back, social review tracking, segmented surveys, and SMS review collection—make it suitable for mid-size to large hotels seeking detailed customer insights.
However, if your team is looking for a straightforward online comment card system for basic feedback collection, b4feedback could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews and features limits its appeal. For hotels prioritizing comprehensive analysis and ongoing support, Loopon remains the more suitable option.
b4feedback’s user interface details are scarce, but the absence of recent reviews or ratings suggests it may lack modern usability standards. Loopon, with a 4.38/5 ease of use rating based on 25 recent reviews, is consistently praised for its intuitive design, straightforward navigation, and quick onboarding. Users find Loopon’s mobile and desktop interfaces user-friendly, enabling staff adoption with minimal training.
Edge: Loopon.
Loopon offers 24 unique features—like customizable questions, real-time alerts, social review tracking, and in-app email responses—that are unmatched by b4feedback, which provides no documented features or recent updates. Loopon’s feature set supports detailed segmentation, analytics, and multi-channel feedback, empowering your team with actionable data.
b4feedback’s limited capabilities and lack of recent development render its feature offering outdated. For a hotel seeking a robust, feature-rich feedback system, Loopon clearly leads.
Loopon’s recent reviews highlight fast, effective support with helpful responses and a dedicated team, reflected in a 4.34/5 support rating from 25 reviews. Customers mention Loopon’s responsiveness as a key factor in successful implementation and ongoing use.
Conversely, b4feedback’s support ratings are unavailable, and the absence of recent reviews suggests limited current support engagement. For reliable assistance, Loopon is the safer choice.
Edge: Loopon.
Loopon integrates with 11 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Sirvoy, enabling seamless data flow. b4feedback has no verified integrations, which could limit its utility in a connected tech stack.
If your hotel relies on multiple systems for operations, Loopon’s integrations make it more adaptable and reduce manual data entry. Edge: Loopon.
With no recent reviews or ratings for b4feedback, it’s impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Loopon benefits from 25 recent reviews, averaging 4.46/5 overall, with high marks from independent and brand hotels alike.
Hotels of all sizes and segments rate Loopon positively, especially valuing its ease of use and detailed analytics. Conversely, b4feedback’s lack of recent customer feedback indicates it’s less trusted today. Edge: Loopon.
b4feedback does not publicly disclose pricing, and its absence of recent reviews suggests limited adoption or ongoing support. Loopon charges $100/month, with no setup fees or tiers, making it transparent and affordable for hotels of various sizes.
If price transparency and ongoing value are priorities, Loopon’s straightforward pricing model offers better clarity and cost-effectiveness.
Not ideal if your hotel needs detailed analytics, integrations, or mobile access, as b4feedback lacks these features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or budget-constrained, as the platform’s advanced features and integrations are designed for larger operations.
Not ideal if:
Loopon provides a comprehensive, well-reviewed guest feedback system with active customer support, numerous integrations, and advanced features. Its 25 recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate strong market acceptance, making it suitable for hotels seeking detailed insights and operational improvements.
b4feedback by b4checkin offers a basic, limited feedback management option, lacking recent customer engagement and features. It might suit very small hotels with minimal needs but doesn’t stand up against Loopon’s proven track record.
If your hotel wants a dependable, feature-rich guest feedback platform, Loopon is the clear choice. For simpler, smaller-scale needs, b4feedback may suffice, but its market presence and recent reviews fall short.
Guest Survey Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
b4feedback by b4checkin
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, b4feedback by b4checkin and Loopon Post Stay share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
b4feedback by b4checkin
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Certified TripAdvisor Review Collection Partner | ||
| Flexible role based reporting | ||
| In app call back | ||
| In app email response | ||
| Mobile Access | ||
| Social review tracking |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users consistently praise Loopon for its intuitive design and ease of navigation, simplifying user administration and making it straightforward to tea... Users consistently praise Loopon for its intuitive design and ease of navigation, simplifying user administration and making it straightforward to teach new users. This ease of use extends to both desktop and mobile devices, though some wish for further improvements in mobile usability.
Hotels find the system excellent for gathering and analyzing guest feedback from multiple channels. Loopon's ability to provide detailed reports and r... Hotels find the system excellent for gathering and analyzing guest feedback from multiple channels. Loopon's ability to provide detailed reports and relevant statistics aids in identifying strengths and weaknesses, improving service quality, and making informed decisions.
Loopon's customer support is frequently highlighted for its speed and effectiveness. Users appreciate the prompt and helpful responses, which make add... Loopon's customer support is frequently highlighted for its speed and effectiveness. Users appreciate the prompt and helpful responses, which make addressing issues and implementing changes easier.
Where hoteliers push back
Users have noted a need for more flexibility in report creation. Currently, they rely heavily on customer support for generating custom reports and st... Users have noted a need for more flexibility in report creation. Currently, they rely heavily on customer support for generating custom reports and statistics, which can be a hindrance.
The system's user administration capabilities are valued for their simplicity. However, there are requests for better self-service functionality to ma... The system's user administration capabilities are valued for their simplicity. However, there are requests for better self-service functionality to make small changes without requiring support intervention.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. b4feedback by b4checkin and Loopon Post Stay share many core Guest Survey Software features, but each has unique capabilities. b4feedback by b4checkin offers 0 verified integration partners, while Loopon Post Stay offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Loopon Post Stay leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
b4feedback by b4checkin: No. Loopon Post Stay: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Survey Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. b4feedback by b4checkin has an HT Score of 0 and Loopon has 23. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor