The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both Backing the packers and protel PMS aim to streamline operations through automation and data insights, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and support. With Backing the packers having no recent reviews and a score of 0, it’s clear they lack validation from hoteliers. Conversely, protel PMS, with over 105 recent reviews and a rating of 4.11/5, stands out as the more trusted choice. Are you ready to rely on a proven system?
Backing the packers, a customer feedback analysis platform, claims to use AI to condense reviews into insights, but it doesn’t function as a PMS. It doesn’t handle reservations, billing, or guest management—core hotel operations—so it’s not a substitute for a PMS. protel PMS, on the other hand, is a complete hotel management platform with extensive features, including booking, billing, and reporting, and is used by hotels across multiple segments. Given the lack of recent reviews, Backing the packers can’t compete with protel’s proven track record.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, go with protel PMS. It’s suitable for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking detailed reporting, multi-property management, and full automation. If your team is looking for AI-driven review insights and customer feedback analysis—without needing a hotel platform—Backing the packers might seem appealing, but its lack of recent validation makes it a risky choice. For real hotel management, protel’s established presence is the clear winner.
Backing the packers offers no user ratings or recent feedback, so its usability remains unverified. protel PMS boasts a 4.12/5 rating based on 105 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding process. Many users describe it as straightforward, even for complex operations, with a clear learning curve. Support response times are generally adequate, although some mention delays. Edge: protel PMS.
Backing the packers doesn’t offer any features beyond AI review analysis, making comparison impossible. protel PMS provides over 46 features, including revenue management, multi-lingual support, booking engine, guest CRM, and integrated payments. Its features are designed for full hotel operation, from reservations to housekeeping and reporting. In contrast, Backing the packers simply analyzes reviews and offers AI summaries, not operational tools. Edge: protel PMS.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or support data, so support quality is unknown. protel PMS, with a 3.95/5 customer support rating and over 105 reviews, offers 24/7 multilingual support and onboarding assistance. Many users commend their helpful, timely responses, though some note that support can be slow during busy periods. Support remains a critical factor for smooth operations. Edge: protel PMS.
Backing the packers has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or no connectivity to other systems. protel PMS, with 195 verified partners, includes integrations with revenue management, booking engines, payment systems, and more, allowing seamless connectivity across hotel operations. Its ecosystem supports over 1,200 hospitality systems, making it highly adaptable. Edge: protel PMS.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or ratings, so no data exists on hotel satisfaction. protel PMS, however, enjoys a 4.11/5 overall rating, with independent hotels rating it 4.5/5 and branded hotels 5/5 in recent reviews. Hotels praise its ease of use, customization, and operational efficiency. The high volume of recent reviews underscores its trusted reputation. Edge: protel PMS.
Backing the packers does not publish pricing, suggesting it may be a custom or undefined service. protel PMS costs $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial available, reflecting its status as a full-featured enterprise-level system. The cost may be justified by its extensive integrations and scalability, but it’s a significant investment.
The core difference is that Backing the packers is a review analysis tool, not a PMS, and offers no recent validation or hotel management features. It’s best suited for teams focused solely on reputation management, not daily hotel operations. protel PMS, with its 4.11/5 rating from over 105 recent reviews, provides a full suite of hotel management tools, proven in diverse hotel segments worldwide.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, detailed reporting, and a strong support network, go with protel PMS. Its feature set and proven hotel industry presence make it the safer, more effective choice. If you’re only interested in review analysis for reputation insights, then Backing the packers may serve that niche—but it's not a comprehensive hotel management solution.
In conclusion, for operational reliability, scalability, and proven hotel management capabilities, protel PMS is the clear recommendation. Its extensive features, trusted reputation, and active support make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming to grow and serve their guests better.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor