The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 105 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while Sirvoy users highlight customer support, ease of use, reservation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #22 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #48 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #37 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #42 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #23 16 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between Backing the packers and Sirvoy hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. Backing the packers is a data analytics platform offering AI-driven insights rather than a traditional PMS, while Sirvoy is a fully functional hospitality management system with a broad feature set and extensive hotel user base.
Given the stark contrast, your team must determine if you need an AI review analysis tool or a comprehensive property management system. Are you looking to understand customer sentiment better or manage reservations and operations? The choice depends on your hotel’s current pain points.
Backing the packers is primarily a review analysis platform, leveraging AI to distill customer feedback into actionable insights. It doesn’t offer booking, room management, or operational features directly. Conversely, Sirvoy provides a full suite of property management tools, including booking engines, channel management, guest communication, and payment processing.
If your hotel needs detailed insights into guest reviews to enhance service quality, Backing the packers offers more recent reviews and a higher NPS score. But for daily operational management, Sirvoy’s extensive features make it the more practical choice. Are you prioritizing understanding guest sentiment or managing reservations efficiently?
If your hotel is looking to improve guest satisfaction through data-driven insights, Backing the packers is appealing, especially given its recent reviews and focus on sentiment analysis. However, its lack of traditional PMS features makes it unsuitable for operational management.
If you need a property management system that handles reservations, channel management, guest communication, and online bookings, Sirvoy stands out. It’s designed for small to medium-sized properties seeking a straightforward yet comprehensive solution. For busy hotels needing operational control, Sirvoy’s feature set and recent positive reviews make it the clear choice.
Backing the packers’ strength lies in its AI review analysis platform, which is straightforward for teams focusing on review insights, with a customizable dashboard. However, it isn’t a booking or front desk system, so ease of use for daily hotel operations isn’t relevant here.
Sirvoy, rated 4.64/5 in ease of use with over 95 reviews, receives high praise for its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal learning curve. Users consistently mention how quickly staff adopt the system, with many expressing satisfaction with its straightforward navigation.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Backing the packers offers no features beyond AI review analysis and customer feedback summarization. It focuses solely on sentiment insights, providing AI-driven summaries and recommendations based on unstructured data.
Sirvoy, on the other hand, boasts 43 features, including multi-channel booking, payment processing, guest CRM, automated reminders, online check-in/out, and a booking engine. It integrates with 21 partners, supporting functions like channel management, guest messaging, and online presence.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Backing the packers doesn’t have publicly available support ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess. Its AI platform likely offers basic customer support, but details are scarce.
Sirvoy, rated 4.85/5 with 95 reviews, is highly praised for its responsive, helpful support team. Reviewers describe the support as prompt, friendly, and effective, with many mentioning how support helped them resolve issues quickly during onboarding and ongoing use.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Backing the packers has no verified integrations, focusing solely on review data analysis. Its value lies in data insights, not operational connectivity.
Sirvoy offers 21 verified integrations, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, plus tools like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds. This extensive connectivity allows seamless synchronization across platforms and better operational flexibility.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or ratings from hoteliers, rendering evaluation impossible. Its niche focus on AI review analysis limits direct hotel feedback.
Sirvoy boasts a 4.64/5 rating from 95 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, support quality, and value. Hoteliers across different segments, especially small hotels and B&Bs, frequently highlight how it simplifies daily operations and improves guest interactions.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Backing the packers’ pricing isn’t publicly available, but it doesn’t appear to follow a traditional SaaS model or charge on a per-room basis. It’s more of a review analysis platform with no trial info.
Sirvoy charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no trial currently available, though it offers a 30-day trial period. This straightforward pricing is designed for small to medium properties seeking affordable, predictable costs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Backing the packers provides an AI-powered review analysis tool that helps hotels interpret customer feedback and identify areas for improvement. It’s best suited for teams seeking deep insights into guest sentiment and reputation management. However, it does not handle reservations or property operations.
Sirvoy is a full property management system designed for small to mid-sized hotels, offering features like booking management, channel synchronization, payments, and guest communication. Its recent reviews, high support ratings, and broad integrations make it a reliable operational platform for properties prioritizing efficiency.
If your hotel already has a PMS or doesn’t need operational software, Backing the packers can complement your existing tools by providing review insights. But if you need an all-in-one property management solution, Sirvoy is the more suitable choice, especially considering its extensive recent reviews and high user ratings.
In conclusion, choose Backing the packers if your focus is on understanding customer sentiment and reputation. Opt for Sirvoy if your goal is to manage reservations, channels, and guest interactions through a straightforward, well-supported platform.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and Sirvoy share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and Sirvoy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while Sirvoy offers 21. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. Sirvoy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and Sirvoy has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor