The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 120 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bay Lakes Information Systems shines .
CiHMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 120 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 120 |
After analyzing 120 verified reviews, Bay Lakes Information Systems users most value its , while CiHMS users highlight operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #45 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #20 31 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 43 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #4 31 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #15 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #10 83 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #15 40 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #17 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #65 0 reviews |
| Europe | — | #58 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #6 117 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #24 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically influence your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Bay Lakes Information Systems and CiHMS aim to streamline your operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and feature depth. While Bay Lakes offers a long-standing legacy with no recent reviews, CiHMS provides a modern, cloud-based platform supported by a wealth of recent user feedback. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s current needs?
Bay Lakes Information Systems has been serving hotels since 1984, theoretically offering a reliable, industry veteran product. However, it has no recent reviews, ratings, or active user feedback, making it impossible to assess current user satisfaction or functionality. CiHMS, on the other hand, boasts 101 reviews with a high overall rating of 81.25 out of 100, and all recent reviews from the last six months are positive, reflecting ongoing support and development.
The key difference is clear: Bay Lakes’ lack of recent feedback means your team cannot confidently rely on its current performance or innovation. CiHMS’s active review base, high scores, and recent feedback provide a more dependable gauge of usability and customer satisfaction. Do you want a proven, well-documented solution or a system backed by recent user experiences?
If your hotel needs a modern, cloud-based PMS with advanced features and active customer support, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its 4.9/5 ease of use, 4.92/5 customer support rating, and 98% likelihood to recommend indicate high satisfaction among users managing a wide range of hotel types, from resorts to city center hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel specifically requires a longstanding industry presence with a focus on traditional property management, and you are comfortable with no recent feedback, Bay Lakes may seem appealing. But without current reviews or recent updates, it’s risky to assume that its functionality remains competitive. Given the available data, CiHMS is the more confident choice for most hotels today.
CiHMS’s user interface earns a near-perfect 4.9 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive, lean design that simplifies daily tasks. Onboarding is rated 4.84/5, and users praise the system for making staff adoption straightforward and quick, especially with its cloud access and mobile capabilities.
Bay Lakes, by contrast, has a 0/5 ease of use rating from reviews, with no specific user feedback available. The lack of recent reviews and high rating scores suggests it might not be as modern or user-friendly as CiHMS. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 features, including a comprehensive suite such as channel management, revenue management, integrated CRS, online booking, guest profiles, automated night audit, multi-currency, and mobile apps—features that dramatically expand operational control.
Bay Lakes provides only basic property management functionalities with no additional modules or integrations reported. Its limited features mean it cannot compete with CiHMS’s extensive capabilities. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s 4.92/5 customer support rating is complemented by recent reviews citing responsive, professional service. Users report timely assistance, especially critical during busy periods, with comments like, “Support team is professional and on-time,” and “Customer service is very helpful and quick to respond.”
Bay Lakes, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, offers no current insights into support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests it may not be actively maintaining support standards. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, facilitating multi-channel distribution and revenue management. Its open architecture allows for seamless connectivity with other systems, essential for hotel chains and multi-property groups.
Bay Lakes has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with modern distribution channels or ancillary systems. This restricts scalability and operational flexibility. Edge: CiHMS.
Since Bay Lakes has no recent reviews, there’s no current user feedback or scores to gauge hotel satisfaction. CiHMS’s recent reviews, with an average rating of 81.25, reflect high satisfaction across diverse segments, including resorts and city hotels. Users frequently mention increased efficiency and ease of management.
Given the more recent and abundant feedback, CiHMS clearly holds the higher rating among hoteliers today. Edge: CiHMS.
Bay Lakes does not publicly disclose its pricing or offer trial options, suggesting a possible custom quote or legacy pricing model. CiHMS charges a base fee of $900, with no ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs, but no free trial is available.
The lack of transparent pricing for Bay Lakes complicates comparison, but CiHMS’s known cost structure and clear value proposition make budgeting easier.
The core difference is that CiHMS is actively supported, feature-rich, and highly rated, while Bay Lakes remains unreviewed in recent years, raising questions about its current relevancy. For hotels that need modern tools, real-time data, and reliable support, CiHMS offers a safer, more proven solution.
Choose Bay Lakes only if your hotel values a traditional approach, operates in regions where it’s established, and does not require ongoing innovation. For most hotels today, especially those seeking adaptability and confidence backed by recent user feedback, CiHMS is the clearly superior option.
In summary, the decision hinges on your hotel’s need for modern features, regional support, and active customer feedback. Given the data, CiHMS stands out as the more dependable, feature-rich, and user-approved choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Bay Lakes Information Systems and CiHMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bay Lakes Information Systems and CiHMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bay Lakes Information Systems offers 0 verified integration partners, while CiHMS offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bay Lakes Information Systems: No. CiHMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bay Lakes Information Systems has an HT Score of 0 and CiHMS has 81. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor