The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines in ROI and onboarding , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Reporting Dashboard.
GuestCentric shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 77 | 23 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its professional assistance and support, data accessibility and flexibility, seamless system integration, while GuestCentric users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Professional Assistance and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Accessibility and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless System Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management Tools
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Interface Intuitiveness Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 29 reviews | #3 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 42 reviews | #7 5 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #13 0 reviews | #9 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #6 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 28 reviews | #4 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 32 reviews | #7 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 19 reviews | #7 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #5 4 reviews | #3 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #12 0 reviews | #15 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #1 76 reviews | #14 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #8 0 reviews | #12 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #10 0 reviews |
Choosing between Blastness CRS and GuestCentric CRS depends on your hotel's size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline reservations and boost direct bookings, but they approach these goals differently. Blastness is a full-featured, independently developed system tailored for diverse hotel types, while GuestCentric offers a more straightforward, highly integrated reservation engine—better suited for larger properties. Which one aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
Blastness CRS boasts a score of 100 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) scale, with 72 reviews, making it the more tested and reviewed option. It offers a broad suite of features including revenue management, channel management, and content control, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use and robust integrations. Conversely, GuestCentric has a lower HTR score of 0, with only 19 reviews—mainly from larger hotels—and lacks recent feedback, which diminishes confidence in its current performance and support.
Both platforms serve the reservation management needs of hotels, but Blastness’s extensive feature set and recent user feedback suggest it's a more reliable choice. GuestCentric’s limited recent reviews and fewer features may leave smaller or mid-sized hotels questioning whether it can meet their evolving needs. Do you want a proven, well-supported system or a platform with limited recent validation?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, all-in-one reservation and revenue management system, Blastness is the clear pick. Its features include RMS, PMS, metasearch, geotargeted pricing, and mobile apps, ideal for independent hotels aiming for control and growth, especially in competitive markets.
If your hotel prioritizes an easy-to-use booking engine integrated into a simple reservation system, GuestCentric might appeal. It’s best for larger properties that want a straightforward booking platform with minimal setup, but its limited recent reviews and smaller user base could indicate less ongoing development or support.
For smaller hotels seeking advanced revenue tools, Blastness is preferable. Larger hotels wanting a simple, effective online reservation interface may find GuestCentric sufficient. Which profile best fits your hotel’s strategic goals?
Blastness scores a 4.89 out of 5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Support from Blastness is rated 4.9, with users praising the responsiveness and professionalism of the team, making staff adoption smoother.
GuestCentric’s usability rating is 4.66, with reviewers citing its user-friendly interface and fewer clicks required, especially for larger properties. However, some mention that the website customization options are limited, which could hinder staff training or daily tweaks.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers a deeper and broader feature set, with 18 unique functionalities including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, metasearch, dynamic pricing, mobile app, and detailed reporting dashboards. Its capacity for multi-property management and advanced revenue tools make it a powerful choice for hotels seeking control and growth.
GuestCentric provides a highly integrated booking engine and reservation interface, but it lacks the extensive feature variety seen in Blastness. It does not offer RMS, PMS, or geotargeted pricing modules, which limits customization and revenue optimization potential.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s support is rated 4.9 out of 5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, professional assistance and ongoing training. Users describe the team as proactive and attentive, which helps hotels resolve issues quickly and confidently.
GuestCentric’s support scores 4.76, with customers appreciating their friendly service but occasionally noting delays or communication gaps. The review comments suggest that while support is generally good, it may not be as consistently responsive as Blastness.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness has verified integrations with 15 partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality and Mews, focusing on connectivity with PMS, RMS, and channel managers. Its integrations are tailored to streamline operations for independent hotels.
GuestCentric boasts 44 verified partners, including Omnibees, WebRezPro, and Cendyn, with a broader range of connectivity options. Larger hotel chains and resorts may benefit from its extensive partner network, but the depth of integration quality varies.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Blastness’s 72 recent reviews reveal an overall rating of 0/5, which appears to be a scoring anomaly. However, the detailed ratings show high marks for ease of use, onboarding, and support. Its recent reviews highlight its effectiveness in revenue management and distribution.
GuestCentric’s 19 reviews average 4.75/5, with positive feedback from larger hotels and resorts, especially praising customer service and flexibility. Yet, some reviews cite dissatisfaction with communication and customization limitations.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness charges a flat monthly fee of $600 with no implementation or setup fees. There’s no free tier or trial information publicly available, but its transparent pricing suggests predictable costs.
GuestCentric does not list specific pricing details publicly, indicating a custom quote based on hotel size and needs. Its lack of transparent pricing can make budget planning more uncertain.
Blastness is a comprehensive, feature-rich CRS that caters to independent hotels seeking control, detailed analytics, and revenue optimization tools. Its broad integrations and recent positive reviews make it a dependable choice for hotels aiming to grow their direct bookings and streamline operations.
GuestCentric offers a straightforward, highly integrated reservation system with a focus on booking conversions, suitable for larger properties that want simplicity and minimal setup hassle. However, its limited recent reviews and narrower feature set may restrict its effectiveness for hotels with complex needs.
If you value proven performance, expansive features, and ongoing support, Blastness is the better choice. Opt for GuestCentric if your hotel prioritizes a simple, effective booking engine and you operate at a scale that benefits from its streamlined approach.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Blastness CRS and GuestCentric CRS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| RMS connectivity | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate respons... Reviews commend the professional and responsive assistance offered by Blastness, highlighting the importance of ongoing training and immediate responses to changes in the market.
Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and... Users appreciate the easy access to comprehensive data and the flexibility in manipulating pricing and settings, beneficial for strategic planning and adjustments.
Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enh... Users report that Blastness integrates well with existing systems, resulting in a cohesive workflow without technical hitches or disruptions, thus enhancing daily operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigati... While generally well-received, some users note that specific sections of the Blastness interface could be more intuitive, which would enhance navigation and user experience.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Blastness CRS and GuestCentric CRS share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness CRS offers 15 verified integration partners, while GuestCentric CRS offers 44. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness CRS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness CRS: No. GuestCentric CRS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 100 and GuestCentric has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor