The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 122 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bnovo (Биново) shines , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest CRM.
CiHMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 122 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 120 |
After analyzing 122 verified reviews, Bnovo (Биново) users most value its , while CiHMS users highlight operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #55 1 reviews | #45 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #20 31 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #51 0 reviews | #4 43 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #4 31 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 reviews | #15 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #70 0 reviews | #10 83 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #15 40 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #17 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #65 0 reviews |
| Europe | #39 2 reviews | #58 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #6 117 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #24 1 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Bnovo PMS and CiHMS aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they cater to different hotel types and user needs. Your decision hinges on your hotel's size, segment, and specific feature requirements.
Bnovo PMS offers a more affordable entry point with basic connectivity and channel management, while CiHMS provides a feature-rich platform with advanced automation and reporting. How do these differences align with your property's unique demands?
Both Bnovo PMS and CiHMS are designed to centralize hotel operations, but their strengths and weaknesses diverge significantly. Bnovo's core focus is on connectivity and basic management, making it suitable for smaller properties or those just starting with PMS technology. However, its overall rating of 2.25/5 and only 2 reviews suggest limited reliability and user satisfaction.
In contrast, CiHMS boasts a 0/5 overall rating based on 91 reviews, yet it has a much deeper feature set and a much higher user satisfaction score among recent users. Its 101 reviews, all recent, reflect a more active user base and stronger market presence. Do you need a simple, budget-friendly solution, or a comprehensive platform that can scale with your property?
If your hotel requires advanced automation, detailed reporting, and multi-channel management, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its extensive features—including real-time status updates, automated night audits, and integrated ID scanners—are suited for mid-sized to large properties or chains aiming for operational excellence.
On the other hand, if your property is small, or you operate motels and villas with basic connectivity needs and budget constraints, Bnovo PMS might suffice. It’s more suitable for properties that prioritize sales channel connectors and straightforward implementation, though its limited support and reliability issues are notable.
Ease of use is a key consideration, especially if your staff will adopt the system quickly. Bnovo PMS scores 3/5 based on limited reviews, with some users citing a "disgusting interface" and "poor support," which may hinder staff training and onboarding. Its mobile interface appears to be problematic, with issues in usability and stability.
CiHMS, however, scores 4.9/5 and is praised for its intuitive, lean UI. Users find it easy to learn, access from multiple devices, and navigate without extensive training, supported by a support team rated nearly perfect. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS outperforms Bnovo in feature depth, with 16 unique features versus only 2 in Bnovo. CiHMS offers automation tools like night audits, ancillary revenue tracking, digital registration, and real-time status updates—features that Bnovo lacks altogether.
Bnovo's only exclusive features are payment processing and guest CRM, which are basic necessities rather than advanced management tools. If you need a PMS with comprehensive automation and reporting, CiHMS holds a clear edge.
Customer support heavily impacts your ability to resolve issues swiftly. Bnovo's support scores just 1.25/5, with reviews describing it as "very bad" and "not able to fix quickly." Users report experiencing system crashes and being left without solutions for extended periods.
In contrast, CiHMS's support scores nearly 5/5, with reviews emphasizing "professional and on-time" support. Many users cite support as a key reason for their satisfaction, enabling smoother onboarding and ongoing maintenance. Edge: CiHMS.
Integration options are vital for connecting your PMS with other tools. Bnovo has only 2 verified partners, mainly focusing on sales channels like compare.me and Aiosell Technologies. CiHMS, however, integrates with 3 major partners, including SiteMinder and DerbySoft, and offers a broader ecosystem of connected tools.
Both systems have room for growth, but CiHMS's wider integration network makes it more adaptable to varied tech stacks. Edge: CiHMS.
Recent reviews clearly favor CiHMS, with a 9.8/5 NPS score and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Its positive reviews highlight ease of use, reliability, and support, especially among larger hotels and resorts.
Bnovo, with only 2 reviews and a 2.5/5 score, has minimal recent feedback, mostly citing support and stability issues. Larger, more sophisticated hotels should lean toward CiHMS, while Bnovo's limited feedback makes its suitability questionable.
Bnovo PMS does not publicly list pricing; it appears to be a custom quote, possibly indicating a flexible or variable pricing model. CiHMS charges a fixed base price of $900, with no mention of ongoing or per-room fees.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Bnovo, your budget considerations should be clarified during discussions. CiHMS's straightforward fee structure offers predictability for planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between the two platforms lies in their scope: Bnovo offers a simple, affordable management tool for small properties, while CiHMS provides a comprehensive system geared toward larger operations seeking automation and insights.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with excellent support and recent positive reviews, CiHMS is the smarter choice. Its robust automation, integrations, and high user satisfaction make it well-suited for hotels aiming to optimize operations and guest experience.
Conversely, if your property is small, budget-conscious, and primarily interested in basic connectivity, Bnovo might serve your needs—though its support issues and limited features suggest caution.
Ultimately, for most hotels looking to grow or streamline efficiently, CiHMS stands out as the more reliable and capable platform.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Bnovo PMS and CiHMS share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bnovo PMS and CiHMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bnovo PMS offers 2 verified integration partners, while CiHMS offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bnovo PMS: No. CiHMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bnovo (Биново) has an HT Score of 0 and CiHMS has 81. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor