The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 59 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bnovo (Биново) shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module.
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 59 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 57 |
After analyzing 59 verified reviews, Bnovo (Биново) users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #55 1 reviews | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #51 0 reviews | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | #70 0 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right PMS for your hotel is critical for streamlining operations, improving guest experiences, and maximizing revenue. Both Bnovo PMS and Counter aim to serve different segments with distinct strengths. Bnovo offers a broad, multi-region platform with comprehensive tools, while Counter focuses on simplicity and ease of use for hostels and small properties. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs and team capabilities?
Both Bnovo PMS and Counter aim to manage reservations, guest check-ins, and property operations. Bnovo provides a robust, cloud-based system that integrates with major OTAs and offers advanced modules like revenue management and CRS, but reviews highlight significant issues with support and system stability. Conversely, Counter is praised for its simplicity, mobile-friendly interface, and strong support, especially among hostel operators, but it has fewer integrations and some bugs affecting core functions. Does your hotel prioritize complex features or straightforward usability?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich system with extensive integrations, real-time OTA connectivity, and advanced revenue tools, Bnovo is the logical pick. Its user base includes motels and villas, with a focus on operational automation and channel management, making it suitable for mid-sized to larger properties in Europe, Asia Pacific, or the Middle East.
Counter, on the other hand, is ideal if you operate a hostel or small property where ease of use, quick onboarding, and mobile management are priorities. Its user base is predominantly hostels, with a high satisfaction rating for simplicity and customer support, mainly in Europe and North America.
In summary, choose Bnovo if your hotel requires a comprehensive, scalable PMS with professional modules. Opt for Counter if your property values intuitive UI and fast setup over extensive feature sets.
Bnovo’s usability is rated 3/5, with reviews indicating a somewhat steep learning curve and a mobile interface that needs improvement. Onboarding is rated 3/5, and support is often criticized for poor responsiveness, with many users mentioning system crashes and bugs that hinder daily operations.
Counter excels with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, praised for its clean, intuitive interface and seamless mobile experience. Users highlight that new staff can be trained quickly, and the platform’s simplicity reduces operational stress. Support responsiveness is also highly rated, with staff like Evelyn and Max frequently praised.
Edge: Counter.
Bnovo offers 16 shared features plus 3 exclusive modules, including revenue management, integrated CRS, and EPoS systems—useful for larger properties with complex needs. Its advanced modules enable dynamic pricing, real-time updates, and sales channel automation, making it suitable for properties seeking comprehensive management.
Counter has 16 shared features and 3 unique ones: automated night audit, mobile app, and ancillary revenue tracking. Its focus on automation, contactless check-in, and simplicity makes it perfect for hostels or small hotels. While lacking some advanced modules, it covers essential operational needs effectively.
Edge: Bnovo, given its broader feature set and specialized modules for scaling.
Counter’s reviews consistently rate support at 4.96/5, with comments highlighting quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Support issues are rare, and users appreciate ongoing improvements and responsiveness.
Bnovo’s support ratings are much lower at 1.25/5, with multiple reviews citing poor responsiveness, system crashes, and unresolved bugs, leading to frustration. Support quality appears inconsistent, negatively impacting user confidence.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds, covering payments, channel management, and access control. It supports connections with popular platforms, but some users note the need for more regional channel options.
Bnovo has only 2 verified integrations, with links to compare.me and Aiosell Technologies. Its limited connections restrict flexibility for properties relying heavily on third-party tools.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is rated 4.75/5 based on 52 reviews, mainly from hostel operators and small hotels, with high marks for ease of use and support. Many users highlight that the system is straightforward, with minimal bugs, and rapidly improves operational flow.
Bnovo’s ratings are much lower at 2.25/5, with only 2 reviews, reflecting significant dissatisfaction. Common complaints include system crashes, poor support, and bugs, making it less favorable overall.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models. Bnovo is typically sold through custom quotes, often with implementation fees, while Counter is free to use with optional paid add-ons, making it more accessible for small properties and hostels.
There are no clear pricing differences, but Counter’s free model and straightforward offerings provide better transparency for small operators.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers simple, low-cost solutions or operates in regions with limited Bnovo support.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive integrations or advanced revenue management tools.
Bnovo PMS is a feature-rich system suitable for larger or more complex properties in regions where its integrations and modules can be fully utilized. Its broad functionality makes it ideal for hotels seeking automation and control across multiple channels.
Counter stands out for its simplicity, responsiveness, and affordability, making it a strong choice for hostels, boutique hotels, and small properties that value user-friendliness above all.
If your hotel’s focus is on comprehensive operations with scalable modules, Bnovo is the better pick. For smaller teams seeking ease of use and excellent support, Counter is the more suitable choice. Ultimately, your decision should depend on your property size, operational complexity, and regional needs.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Bnovo PMS and Counter share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Revenue management module |
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bnovo PMS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bnovo PMS offers 2 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bnovo PMS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bnovo (Биново) has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor