The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shines .
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 100 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES users most value its , while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #29 11 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and roommaster PMS hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both aim to streamline property management, but their features, market presence, and customer feedback differ significantly. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers a centralized platform for property management, but with no recent reviews or user ratings, its reliability remains uncertain. In contrast, roommaster PMS boasts a high user rating, recent positive feedback, and extensive integration options, making it the more proven solution for hotel operations.
Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a well-supported, feature-rich PMS with broad market adoption or a less-reviewed system that might lack the same level of user confidence. So, which platform will better serve your hotel’s specific operational needs?
Both BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and roommaster PMS aim to simplify property management, yet their approaches diverge sharply. BOCS is marketed as a comprehensive management system, primarily targeting real estate firms with extensive tenant and financial management tools, but it lacks recent user reviews, making its effectiveness difficult to verify in hotel settings.
Roommaster PMS, on the other hand, has accumulated 83 reviews, with 17 in the last six months, signaling active user engagement and ongoing product updates. It scores 4.33 out of 5 and a strong NPS of 8.67/10, reflecting high user satisfaction. The product’s focus on reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and financial management directly aligns with hotel needs, and recent reviews praise its ease of use and real-time reporting capabilities.
Do you need a proven hotel-specific PMS with a track record of customer satisfaction? Or is your focus on a broader property management platform that may lack recent validation?
If your hotel requires a robust, hotel-specific PMS with extensive features and active support, go with roommaster PMS. Its 83 reviews, recent positive feedback, and high ratings for ease of use and customer support make it a safe choice for properties seeking reliable operations and data-driven decision-making.
Conversely, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES appears oriented toward property management in real estate rather than hospitality, lacking recent reviews and with no verified support or feature data relevant to hotels. If your focus is on tenant or rental property management, BOCS might fit; for hotel operations, roommaster’s proven track record is more compelling.
In short, for hotels, roommaster PMS clearly stands out as the more dependable option due to its active user base and feature set.
Roommaster PMS scores 4.22 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its straightforward back-office features, quick onboarding, and user-friendly interface. Users praise its intuitive reservation management and real-time reporting, which reduces manual errors and training time.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no clear user feedback on usability. Its lack of visibility and support data suggests it’s less tested or adopted in hotel environments, making it difficult to evaluate its ease of use.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS offers over 60 features, including channel management, revenue management, online booking engine, guest profiles, integrated payment solutions, and automated reporting—many tailored specifically for hotels. It’s designed to handle reservations, housekeeping, billing, and guest communication within a single system.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES, with no verified features listed, appears to lack dedicated hotel functionalities. Its focus on property management for real estate suggests limited hotel-specific tools and integrations.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS’s support scores 4.25 out of 5, with recent reviews praising quick responses, effective problem-solving, and support staff knowledge. Users note that the support team is responsive and helpful, essential qualities for hotel operations.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers no recent customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its lack of recent engagement suggests less confidence in ongoing customer service.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS boasts 56 verified integrations, including major channel managers, POS systems, CRMs, and booking engines. Its broad partner network enables seamless connectivity with various hotel technologies, streamlining operations.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES reports zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options for modern hotel tech stacks. This gap could hinder operational efficiency and guest experience in a competitive market.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS enjoys a 4.33/5 overall rating based on 83 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its efficiency, support, and feature set. Hoteliers from diverse segments, including boutique hotels, resorts, and motels, appreciate its user-friendliness and operational benefits.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without customer feedback, confidence in its effectiveness remains low.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS charges a $500 monthly fee, with no free trial or upfront implementation costs specified. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and integrations.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES provides no pricing information, making it difficult to evaluate its value proposition or compare costs directly.
In this case, budget considerations favor roommaster PMS, which has transparent, predictable costs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
If you want a hotel-focused property management system with proven user satisfaction, extensive features, and broad integrations, roommaster PMS is the clear choice. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and active support network make it a reliable partner for operational success.
In contrast, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES appears better suited for property management in real estate or rental markets, not hotels. Its lack of recent reviews, features, or user feedback makes it a risky choice for hospitality operations.
Choosing roommaster PMS means investing in a system with a strong market presence, ongoing support, and a track record of streamlining hotel workflows. If your hotel values dependable technology and active user communities, roommaster is the recommended solution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and roommaster PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 48 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers 0 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster PMS leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor