The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can drastically influence your hotel's operations and revenue. You’re evaluating BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and RoomRaccoon PMS; both promise to streamline management but serve different segments and needs. With RoomRaccoon’s more recent reviews and significantly higher ratings, it currently stands out as the more proven choice, especially for small to mid-sized hotels.
Your decision hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans. Do you need a robust, all-in-one platform with extensive features? Or a straightforward, easy-to-use system that integrates well with your current setup? Let’s explore both options in depth.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES aims to serve property managers with a comprehensive platform that centralizes rental and tenant management, offering detailed insights and operational recommendations through AI. It’s designed for real estate firms managing multiple properties, emphasizing data analysis and strategic decision support.
In contrast, RoomRaccoon is built specifically for hoteliers, especially small and independent hotels, focusing on automating guest interactions, reservations, and revenue management. It consolidates booking, channel management, and PMS functionalities into an intuitive, user-friendly interface.
While BOCS offers a broad management perspective, its lack of recent reviews and low overall ratings make its real-world effectiveness uncertain. RoomRaccoon’s 169 reviews, with recent feedback in the last 6 months, reflect its active market presence and ongoing improvements.
Are you seeking a property-focused system optimized for guest management? Or a real estate-centric platform with advanced data analysis? Your hotel’s core operations determine which better fits your needs.
If your hotel is an independent, small property or boutique, and your priority is efficient reservation handling, revenue growth, and guest communication automation, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, ease of use, and positive recent reviews make it ideal for properties with limited staff needing to maximize operational efficiency.
However, if your hotel management involves complex property portfolios, tenant management, or rental operations requiring deep analytics and property performance insights, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES might be more suitable. Its AI-driven recommendations and tenant feedback analysis cater to real estate firms rather than traditional hotels.
Given the review data, RoomRaccoon’s high user satisfaction and recent active customer feedback make it the more reliable pick for most hoteliers today. BOCS’s lack of recent reviews and zero score suggest limited current market relevance.
RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating from 169 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers highlight how quickly staff can adapt, often mentioning that it simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, bookings, and invoicing.
Meanwhile, BOCS Group of Companies has a 0/5 rating, with no recent reviews or user feedback available. Its complexity and lack of current support make it impossible to assess usability, but the absence of reviews suggests it may not be as accessible or user-friendly for hotel teams.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers a comprehensive set of 51 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, automated guest communication, online check-in, mobile app, CRM, and various reporting tools—many tailored for small hotel operations. Its features enable automation, dynamic pricing, and revenue optimization, all in an easy-to-navigate platform.
In contrast, BOCS Group of Companies has zero features listed, indicating limited or no current offerings for hotel management. Its focus appears to be on property and tenant management, not hotel operations, making it unsuitable for typical hotel needs.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support and onboarding are rated at 4.53/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive assistance. Hoteliers recount how quick support and clear onboarding have eased their transition and ongoing use.
BOCS Group of Companies has no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unclear. Its lack of visible feedback suggests limited or no current support infrastructure for hotel clients.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including popular booking engines, payment providers, and channel management solutions. Its extensive marketplace allows hotels to connect with tools like Sage, Becurious, RevControl, and many others, enhancing operational flexibility.
BOCS Group of Companies has no listed integrations, which restricts its ability to connect with other systems or facilitate multi-platform management. Its limited connectivity hampers operational scalability for most hotels.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.88/5 from 169 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and revenue gains, showcases widespread satisfaction across small and boutique hotels. Many users highlight how its features directly impact revenue and operational simplicity.
BOCS Group of Companies has a 0/5 rating with no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. The absence of feedback suggests it is not actively serving or supporting hotel clients today.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon charges a base price of $1,000 per month, with no mention of additional implementation fees or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing aligns with its feature-rich offering for small hotels.
BOCS Group of Companies does not specify pricing, and given the lack of recent reviews or case studies, it is likely not actively marketed or priced for hotel clients in the current market.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their target audiences: BOCS is tailored for property management and tenant operations, while RoomRaccoon is optimized for hoteliers seeking automation and revenue growth. Currently, RoomRaccoon’s active reviews, high ratings, and abundant features make it the more dependable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel is small, independent, and customer-centric, RoomRaccoon offers a ready-to-go platform that enhances operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and proven support system justify its leading position.
Conversely, if your focus is on managing multiple rental properties, tenants, or real estate portfolios, BOCS might serve your needs better—though its lack of recent market presence and reviews raise concerns about current support and functionality. For traditional hotel management, RoomRaccoon remains the more suitable, trusted solution.
In summary, unless your primary focus is property and tenant management beyond hospitality, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice for hotel teams seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS that drives revenue and guest satisfaction.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers 0 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor