The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Stayntouch aim to streamline hotel management but serve different needs with varied capabilities. BOCS offers a comprehensive platform mainly for real estate management, while Stayntouch specializes in hotel operations with an emphasis on user-friendliness and extensive integrations. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES is tailored for property management, focusing on rental properties and tenant interactions, with a suite of tools that support operational efficiency in real estate. In contrast, Stayntouch is built specifically for hotels, offering a cloud-based PMS that emphasizes reservation management, guest satisfaction, and multi-property oversight.
While BOCS provides AI-driven insights for property performance, Stayntouch boasts a user rating of 4.56 out of 5 based on 317 recent reviews, compared to BOCS’s zero ratings and reviews. This difference clearly indicates that Stayntouch has a more established reputation in the hotel industry. Are you looking for a real estate management system or a hotel-focused solution?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, guest-centric PMS with comprehensive integrations, go with Stayntouch. It’s ideal for hotels that prioritize mobile check-in, real-time reporting, and multi-property management, especially if your team values ease of use and rapid onboarding.
If, however, your hotel’s core operations revolve around rental property management, tenant relations, and financial transactions, BOCS offers a broad property management platform suited to real estate firms. Its AI-based operational insights can help optimize leasing strategies and tenant satisfaction, making it well-suited for property portfolios but not specifically for hotel operations.
Stayntouch is rated 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, modern screens, and quick learning curve. Its onboarding process is rated 4.58 out of 5, and reviews highlight how staff can adapt swiftly, reducing training time and improving productivity.
In contrast, BOCS has a 0/5 ease of use rating and no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its user experience. Given the consistent positive feedback for Stayntouch’s user-friendliness, it’s clear that it offers a smoother experience for hotel teams.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch features 49 dedicated hotel management modules, including revenue management, online check-in, guest messaging, mobile housekeeping, and integrated payment processing. It also offers advanced automation like night audit, shift planning, and real-time status updates.
BOCS lacks dedicated hotel features, focusing instead on property and tenant management tools without the extensive hotel-specific modules. The lack of features like online check-in, guest messaging, or mobile apps puts BOCS at a disadvantage for hotel operators.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support and onboarding are rated 4.68 out of 5, with positive reviews emphasizing helpful, friendly support and thorough training. Customers appreciate quick assistance and proactive service, especially during system implementation.
BOCS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to compare support quality. The extensive positive feedback for Stayntouch indicates it provides more reliable, consistent customer support — a critical factor for hotel operations.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 third-party systems, including popular revenue management, CRS, and contactless check-in providers, enabling a highly connected hotel environment. These integrations support seamless workflows and enhance operational flexibility.
BOCS reports zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems and third-party tools. For hotels seeking an open, extensible platform, Stayntouch’s extensive integration network is a clear advantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s industry rating of 4.56/5 from 317 reviews demonstrates its high satisfaction among users, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use, support quality, and functionality. Hotels in segments like boutique hotels, independent properties, and branded hotels give particularly high scores, with some rating it as high as 4.93/5.
BOCS’s ratings are nonexistent, but the lack of reviews indicates limited hotel industry adoption or public feedback. The clear preference for Stayntouch among hotel operators favors its reputation.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no implementation or setup fees, making it straightforward for budgeting. BOCS pricing is not publicly available, leaving potential customers uncertain about the total cost and value.
Given the transparent pricing and flexible subscription model, Stayntouch offers more predictable costs for hotels. BOCS’s unclear pricing may hinder decision-making.
Not ideal if you want a hotel-centric system with guest-facing capabilities or extensive integrations tailored for hospitality.
Not ideal if your operations are centered around property leasing or tenant management rather than guest hospitality.
The core difference lies in their focus: BOCS is designed for property management, especially rentals and tenants, while Stayntouch is built for hotel operations, emphasizing guest services and booking management. For hoteliers, choosing the right system hinges on your primary business model.
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, feature-rich PMS that enhances guest interactions and offers extensive integrations, go with Stayntouch. Its high review count and recent positive feedback support its effectiveness in the hotel industry.
If your focus is managing rental properties or tenant portfolios, BOCS provides a solid platform, but keep in mind its lack of hotel-specific features and integrations.
Choose BOCS if you operate in real estate or rental management. Opt for Stayntouch if your goal is to improve hotel guest experiences and operational efficiency with robust third-party connections.
This comparison aims to equip you with the facts needed to make a confident, well-informed decision for your hotel’s future.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor