The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bokun shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Bokun users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Bokun |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Bokun by Bokun is primarily a booking management platform tailored for tour operators and experience providers, while Shiji Daylight PMS is a comprehensive cloud-native solution designed for all hotel types. Both aim to streamline operations, but they serve different core functions and user needs.
Your decision hinges on whether you need a specialized booking engine or a full-featured PMS capable of managing complex hotel operations. Are you looking to simplify reservations or to optimize your entire hotel management process?
Bokun specializes in managing reservations for tours, activities, and experience-based products, making it ideal for travel agencies, activity providers, and small operators. Its core strength lies in inventory management, automated customer communications, and API integrations, designed to maximize booking revenues for niche tourism services.
In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS offers a broad suite of hotel management tools, including guest profiles, housekeeping, billing, and multi-property management, built to serve hotels of all sizes. Its extensive feature set supports operational tasks like room allocation, revenue management, and detailed reporting, which Bokun does not provide.
Both platforms aim to improve booking volume and operational clarity, but their applications diverge sharply. Do you primarily need a booking system for activities or a comprehensive hotel management platform?
If your hotel needs a dedicated booking platform that integrates with your website and online distribution channels for activities, tours, or experiences, Bokun is the clear choice. Its API capabilities and inventory management features are built for brands focusing on travel bookings, not hotel operations.
If your hotel requires an all-in-one management system with features like guest profiles, room assignments, billing, and staff management, Shiji Daylight PMS is the better fit. It’s designed to handle the complexity of hotel operations, supporting both small boutique hotels and large chains with scalable solutions.
For property managers looking to elevate operational efficiency across multiple locations, Shiji’s extensive feature matrix and established industry presence make it the logical pick. Conversely, if your focus is on streamlining activity reservations and customer communications, Bokun’s niche tools will serve you better.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Based on recent reviews, Shiji Daylight PMS holds a significant advantage in ease of use, with a rating of 4.63/5 from 32 recent reviews. Users praise its intuitive interface, helpful training materials, and minimal learning curve, which helps staff adopt the system quickly.
Bokun, on the other hand, has a rating of 0/5, indicating no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability. Historically, Bokun's interface is designed for booking management but may lack the polish and user-friendly flow seen in Shiji.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Shiji Daylight PMS offers an extensive set of 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-language support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, payment processing, and housekeepings modules—features critical for hotel management. It also supports automation, real-time reporting, and guest communication tools, making it a comprehensive operational platform.
Bokun has zero listed features, focusing solely on booking management, inventory, and API capabilities for tour and activity providers. It lacks the broad operational functionalities that hotels need for daily management.
Given the feature gap, Shiji Daylight PMS’s breadth clearly surpasses Bokun. If you want a full PMS, it’s the superior choice.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a support rating of 4.53/5 based on recent reviews, with users frequently citing helpfulness, professionalism, and timely assistance. Many reviews mention smooth onboarding and ongoing support that minimizes operational disruptions.
Bokun’s support rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews to evaluate support quality. Historically, given its niche focus, Bokun may lack the dedicated support infrastructure seen in larger PMS providers.
For critical hotel operations, reliable support can be decisive. Shiji’s proven track record makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Shiji Daylight PMS integrates with 64 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Revinate, Oaky, Amadeus, Duetto, and others, facilitating connections across distribution, revenue management, and CRM. These integrations extend operational versatility and data synchronization across systems.
Bokun lists no verified partners or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems or distribution channels. This restriction hampers scalability and operational efficiency for hotels needing multi-system connectivity.
If seamless integrations are crucial, Shiji offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Since Bokun has no recent reviews, it cannot be rated meaningfully, whereas Shiji Daylight PMS has a recent NPS score of 8.94/10 from 32 reviews. Hotels across segments—luxury, branded, city center, and hostels—consistently praise its usability, support, and feature set.
Hotels in larger chains or multiple-property groups especially appreciate the system's scalability and efficiency. Boutique hotels also find value in the user-friendly interface and detailed reporting.
Given the recent, positive feedback, Shiji Daylight PMS clearly holds higher hotel ratings.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Bokun’s pricing remains undisclosed, and it appears to operate on a custom or undefined pricing model. Without transparency, it’s difficult to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.
Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200 per month, with no free tier or trial, making it a significant investment. This pricing reflects its extensive feature set and enterprise-grade capabilities.
If budget constraints are a concern, Bokun might seem attractive but lacks clarity. For comprehensive hotel management, Shiji’s pricing is justified by its functionalities.
Not ideal if:
Bokun is best for activity-centric businesses rather than traditional hotels.
Not ideal if:
Shiji Daylight PMS suits hotels that want a scalable, operationally comprehensive system.
The core difference is that Bokun is a niche booking engine tailored for activity providers, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers a full-spectrum hotel management platform. Bokun’s strengths lie in inventory control and integrations for travel experiences, but it lacks core hotel operational features.
Choose Bokun if your hotel’s focus is on activity booking, especially for smaller or experience-oriented brands seeking API flexibility. But if you need a trusted, all-in-one property management solution that handles guest data, billing, and multi-property operations, Shiji is the clear winner.
For hotels aiming for operational excellence and scalability, Shiji Daylight PMS is the recommended choice. Conversely, if your hotel’s core need is activity reservation management, Bokun may be sufficient—but remember, it offers no recent reviews or broad operational tools.
In conclusion, the decision should hinge on your hotel’s primary operational focus. For comprehensive management and industry-wide support, Shiji Daylight PMS dominates. For activity booking with API flexibility, Bokun is a viable but less proven option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Bokun |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Bokun and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bokun and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bokun offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bokun: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bokun has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor