The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BPayment shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, BPayment users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BPayment |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BPayment |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BPayment |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BPayment |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Your hotel is evaluating payment processing platforms that can simplify financial operations, improve cash flow, and integrate smoothly into your existing systems. Both BPayment by BPayment and ROH claim to handle payments, but they serve very different market positions and feature sets. BPayment is a lesser-known, unreviewed platform with no recent feedback, while ROH is a well-established, highly-rated solution with a substantial user base and recent reviews. Which one aligns better with your needs?
Both products aim to streamline your hotel's payment workflows, but they diverge in scope, usability, and sophistication. As of today, ROH stands out because it offers extensive features and a high satisfaction rating, whereas BPayment lacks reviews and detailed functionality. Are you ready to choose a platform backed by real user experiences and proven results?
BPayment and ROH are both designed to facilitate hotel payments but differ significantly in maturity and feature depth. BPayment’s offering appears minimal, with no features, reviews, or integrations listed, suggesting it may be a nascent or untested system. Meanwhile, ROH boasts 19 exclusive features, including refund management, payment splitting, and acceptances for major card brands, all of which support more complex payment scenarios.
ROH’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, real-time reporting, and support for automation, making it a clear leader. BPayment has no recent reviews or user feedback, leaving its actual effectiveness unverified. Given the data, which platform do you trust to meet your operational needs?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, reliable payment system with proven user satisfaction, ROH is the clear choice. It is suited for hotels that want automation, extensive payment options, and strong support, especially given its 65 recent reviews and 4.97 support rating.
If your hotel’s needs are minimal or you are testing a new platform without requiring advanced features, BPayment might technically suffice, though its lack of reviews and features makes this a risky choice. For hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, ROH’s track record makes it the safer bet.
ROH scores exceptionally high for ease of use, with a 4.95/5 rating and recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface that simplifies payment and invoicing processes. Hotel staff find ROH intuitive, with onboarding rated 4.92/5 and many users noting its straightforward setup and operation.
BPayment, on the other hand, has no ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given the available data, ROH’s proven simplicity and support make it the preferable option.
Edge: ROH
ROH offers 19 unique features not available in BPayment, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and support for Apple Pay, Google Pay, and major credit cards. It also provides chargeback management, tokenization, and PCI compliance, enabling more secure and flexible transactions.
BPayment does not list any features or integrations, indicating a likely limited or undeveloped product. For hotels seeking robust payment capabilities that support complex scenarios, ROH’s feature set provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: ROH
ROH’s customer support is rated at 4.97/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its helpfulness and quick responses. Users appreciate the onboarding process, which is rated 4.92/5, and highlight the support staff’s ability to resolve issues efficiently.
BPayment has no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unknown. In hospitality, dependable support is critical, and ROH’s high support ratings clearly favor it.
Edge: ROH
ROH has one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality, while BPayment has no listed integrations or verified partners. Although limited, ROH’s integration capability with a major hotel technology provider demonstrates its potential flexibility.
Without verified integrations, BPayment appears less capable of fitting into your existing tech stack, which is essential for seamless operations. Therefore, ROH’s integration support, even if limited, is more advantageous.
Edge: ROH
ROH’s reviews are recent (10 in the last six months) and highly positive, with a 9.91/10 NPS score and 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and boutique properties, praise its ease of use and automation.
BPayment has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the current data, hotelier ratings overwhelmingly favor ROH.
Edge: ROH
BPayment’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not appear to offer a free trial or transparent fee structure. ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation fees or additional charges.
The transparency and simple pricing model of ROH make it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly. The absence of pricing info from BPayment disadvantages it as a viable choice.
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of reviews and features, BPayment is best suited for experimental or very small-scale use.
Not ideal if:
ROH is tailored for hotels that want to turn payments into a strategic asset.
ROH and BPayment serve contrasting market segments. ROH is an established, feature-rich platform with strong recent reviews, high customer satisfaction, and a clear focus on automating payment processes for hospitality. BPayment remains unreviewed and with no listed features, making it a risky choice for serious hotel operators.
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported payment solution that can scale with your operations, ROH is the recommended choice. Its recent reviews, comprehensive features, and high support ratings make it the more reliable option.
Choose BPayment only if you are exploring new technology, have extremely modest needs, or want to experiment without significant investment. For operational stability, guest satisfaction, and future growth, ROH stands out as the smarter investment.
According to HTR's product database, BPayment and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BPayment |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BPayment and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. BPayment offers 0 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BPayment: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BPayment has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor