The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
OpenHotel shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while OpenHotel users highlight customer support, user-friendly pms, continuous updates and improvements. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Updates and Improvements
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct OTA Connections
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Financial Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #39 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #50 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #21 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #37 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #45 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #28 9 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #43 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #14 54 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and profitability. Both Cambridge PMS by Shiji and OpenHotel PMS aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a system with extensive features and recent positive reviews or one with a broader user base and higher customer satisfaction. Do you need a comprehensive platform or a more user-friendly solution?
Cambridge PMS is a traditional, less-reviewed option, mainly lacking recent user feedback or extensive features, while OpenHotel boasts a highly-rated, actively used platform with strong recent reviews and a broad feature set. Which aligns better with your hotel's current needs and growth plans?
Cambridge PMS, by Shiji, presents as a minimal interface with no recent reviews, ratings, or clear user feedback, raising questions about its current usability and support. Meanwhile, OpenHotel delights in recent, detailed reviews, with a 4.81/5 overall rating from 57 reviews, and a rating of 9.53/5 in NPS score, signaling high user satisfaction. Given the lack of recent data on Cambridge, can you confidently rely on its ability to meet evolving industry standards?
Both products serve hotel management needs, but OpenHotel's comprehensive feature set, including channel management, revenue tools, and online support, starkly contrasts Cambridge's single verified partner. Are you comfortable deploying a system with uncertain support and limited functionality, or do you prefer a proven, feature-rich platform?
If your hotel requires a modern, highly-rated PMS with a broad feature set, go with OpenHotel. It suits small to medium hotels seeking an intuitive platform with strong customer support and recent positive reviews. Conversely, if your hotel is comfortable with a less documented, potentially outdated system, Cambridge might be considered, though its lack of recent feedback raises concerns about ongoing support or updates.
Your team should prioritize OpenHotel if operational ease, customer satisfaction, and integrated features are critical. If your hotel is budget-conscious and willing to navigate a less transparent platform, Cambridge could be an option, but the risk remains high without recent validation.
OpenHotel's user-rated ease of use is exceptional at 4.71/5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive layout, straightforward navigation, and helpful onboarding process. Conversely, Cambridge PMS scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews, making its usability uncertain and potentially difficult for staff to adopt effectively. Does your team need a system that minimizes training and accelerates staff adoption?
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel offers 23 features, including channel management, EPoS, revenue management, booking engine, group tools, and guest communication, making it a versatile platform. Cambridge PMS has no documented features or integrations, leaving its capabilities unclear. Do you need a system that covers essential hotel operations out of the box, or are you comfortable with a minimal or unproven product?
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel’s support scores 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing responsive, personalized, and helpful service. Meanwhile, Cambridge PMS has no recent support ratings or reviews, leaving its customer service quality in question. Would your team benefit from a proven support team available during critical moments?
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel integrates with 12 verified partners, including major OTAs, revenue management, and payment systems, while Cambridge PMS only lists one verified partner, Duetto. If integration breadth and flexibility are priorities, does Cambridge’s limited ecosystem meet your needs?
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel receives a 4.81/5 overall rating from 57 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its usability and support. Cambridge PMS, lacking recent reviews, provides no current rating or user sentiment. For hotelier confidence and ongoing validation, which platform seems more reliable?
Edge: OpenHotel.
Pricing details for Cambridge PMS are unavailable, suggesting a possible custom or enterprise model. OpenHotel’s pricing is also not publicly listed, but no trial or freemium options are offered. Are you prepared for an opaque pricing structure or potential hidden costs?
Not ideal if…
Not ideal if…
Cambridge PMS by Shiji presents as a potentially basic, enterprise-oriented system with limited recent validation, making it risky for modern hotels. OpenHotel, with a 4.81/5 rating from 57 reviews, offers a user-friendly, feature-rich platform that actively satisfies hoteliers' needs today.
If your hotel needs a proven, well-supported system with recent positive reviews and broad features, OpenHotel is the clear choice. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction make it a reliable partner for your hotel’s growth.
Choose Cambridge if you are comfortable with limited recent feedback, seeking a straightforward, possibly budget-friendly solution, and willing to accept risk. For most hotels aiming for operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and future readiness, OpenHotel stands out as the superior option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
OpenHotel
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and OpenHotel PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of... The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of the team during emergencies and the seamless transition to OpenHotel PMS. This support aids in smooth operations, especially during peak seasons or system transitions.
Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers sea... Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers seamless transitions from other systems. Users note it is particularly effective for small to medium-sized properties because of its flexible booking grid and comprehensive layout.
Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-d... Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-date with industry standards and evolving hotel needs. Notifications about these updates are shared through inbox notifications, making it convenient for users to stay informed.
Where hoteliers push back
While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports a... While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports and improved metrics suited to specific properties. Some users find current reports cluttered with unnecessary information and have suggested enhancements to better meet their needs.
Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and in... Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and integration with external fiscal systems. However, enhancements are suggested, particularly around real-time tax reporting and card payment interventions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and OpenHotel PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while OpenHotel PMS offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. OpenHotel PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. OpenHotel PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and OpenHotel has 16. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor