The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 105 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while Sirvoy users highlight customer support, ease of use, reservation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #22 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #48 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #37 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #42 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #23 16 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel, impacting daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. You’re evaluating Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Sirvoy—two platforms designed to streamline hospitality management. While both aim to improve efficiency, they diverge significantly in maturity, user experience, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on understanding these differences and how they align with your hotel’s needs.
Cambridge PMS offers a comprehensive suite but lacks recent user feedback, while Sirvoy provides a growing feature set with a strong current reputation. Which one will serve your property best?
Cambridge PMS by Shiji presents itself as an all-encompassing, enterprise-grade solution tailored for larger hotels and resorts, focusing on operational control and detailed reporting. Its minimal feature set and absence of recent reviews raise questions about its current usability and support. Sirvoy, by contrast, is built with small to medium-sized properties in mind, emphasizing ease of use and affordability, supported by a strong review presence with recent feedback.
Both products aim to automate booking, guest communication, and housekeeping but differ in their maturity. Given the absence of recent Cambridge PMS reviews and a 0/5 rating, it’s clear Sirvoy’s more recent user feedback makes it the more reliable choice today. Do you need a robust, feature-rich system or a straightforward, easy-to-use tool?
If your hotel needs simple reservation management, quick onboarding, and strong customer support, Sirvoy is the clear choice. Its high ease-of-use rating (4.64/5) and recent reviews praising support and affordability make it ideal for small hotels, B&Bs, hostels, and vacation rentals.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a comprehensive platform with extensive features, advanced reporting, and deep integration capabilities—especially if you operate at scale—Cambridge PMS may seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews and a zero rating, it’s difficult to justify over Sirvoy’s proven track record. For most hotels seeking reliability and support, Sirvoy is the safer pick.
Sirvoy overwhelmingly outperforms Cambridge PMS in ease of use, boasting a 4.64/5 rating from recent reviews. Users highlight its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and helpful customer support, with comments like “Support is excellent” and “Software is super easy to use."
Cambridge PMS, on the other hand, scores a 0/5; its interface and usability are unverified, and the lack of recent reviews cast doubt on its user-friendliness. Based on current data, Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers 43 unique features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and integrated payment processing. These tools cover most daily operational needs and offer options for upselling, marketing, and automation.
Cambridge PMS provides no documented features, making it impossible to evaluate its capabilities. Given Sirvoy’s extensive feature set and recent positive reviews, it’s the clear leader here. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s customer support earns a 4.85/5 rating with recent reviews describing it as “responsive,” “helpful,” and “prompt.” Guests appreciate quick assistance, which reduces operational hiccups and guest frustration.
Cambridge PMS’s support ratings are unverified, with no recent reviews or ratings available. The lack of recent feedback makes it impossible to assess support quality. Based on current data, Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS, plus integrations with payment providers and marketing tools. It covers the needs of most small to medium-sized properties.
Cambridge PMS has only one verified integration, Duetto, limiting its flexibility and scalability. For a hotel seeking variety and future growth, Sirvoy’s wider integration network is advantageous. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s recent reviews and NPS score (9.41/10) reflect high satisfaction among small to medium-sized hotels, inns, hostels, and resorts. Hotels in these segments consistently praise its ease of use, support, and value.
Cambridge PMS’s review count and ratings are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the active, recent positive feedback for Sirvoy, it clearly holds the higher rating. Edge: Sirvoy.
Cambridge PMS does not publicly disclose pricing details and seems to lack a trial or transparent fee structure. This opacity can make budgeting and decision-making difficult.
Sirvoy charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no setup or implementation costs. Its transparent pricing and 30-day trial support easier evaluation and comparison. Based on value and clarity, Sirvoy offers better cost transparency.
Cambridge PMS may suit properties with established enterprise-level infrastructure but is less suitable for small or medium-sized businesses seeking agility.
Sirvoy’s simplicity and recent positive feedback make it ideal for properties prioritizing operational ease.
Cambridge PMS presents itself as a comprehensive, enterprise-level solution designed for large-scale operations. Yet, its lack of recent reviews and unclear feature set leave its current usability uncertain, making it a risky choice without further validation.
Sirvoy, with over 95 recent reviews and a high NPS score, delivers an intuitive experience tailored for small to medium-sized hotels. Its extensive feature set, strong support, and transparent pricing make it the more reliable and practical option today.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, well-supported system that will facilitate daily operations and guest management without complexity, Sirvoy is your best choice. It’s proven, well-rated, and flexible enough to grow with your property.
However, if your property is large, complex, and requires enterprise features with extensive customization, further investigation into Cambridge PMS’s capabilities is warranted, though current data suggests Sirvoy is better suited for most typical hotel operations.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and Sirvoy share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and Sirvoy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while Sirvoy offers 21. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. Sirvoy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and Sirvoy has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor