The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,508 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Canary Technologies shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Payment & Authorizations and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Arribatec shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,508 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,508 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,508 verified reviews, Canary Technologies users most value its contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, while Arribatec users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Automatic Notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 98 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 1042 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 228 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 105 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 573 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 680 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 116 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 1308 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 65 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #1 27 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 11 reviews | — |
Choosing between Canary Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both solutions aim to modernize the guest arrival experience, but Canary’s platform offers a broader suite of features and a more established market presence. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize advanced integrations, guest engagement tools, and proven reliability or a more streamlined, innovative approach.
Canary’s extensive feature set and superior review metrics make it the more proven choice, especially for hotels aiming to scale and optimize their contactless check-in processes. Fàcil’s solutions, while promising, lack the depth and customer validation seen with Canary.
Both products address the core challenge of reducing front desk congestion and increasing guest convenience during check-in, but they diverge in scope and sophistication. Canary offers a comprehensive platform with 21 unique features, including ID verification, document scanning, network security, and pre-arrival upselling, which are absent in Fàcil. Meanwhile, Fàcil provides digital self-service options like kiosks, web-apps, holographic check-in, and mobile keys, focusing more on innovation than extensive feature depth.
Canary’s platform has accumulated over 1,390 reviews with a high-rated 4.68/5 overall and recent reviews from the last six months. Fàcil, on the other hand, has no available review data, making Canary the safer choice for reliability and proven performance. Is your hotel ready to invest in a mature, feature-rich platform rather than a newer, less validated solution?
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable guest management system that integrates with existing PMS and boosts revenue through upselling, go with Canary. Its extensive feature set, verified integrations with 54 partners, and global market presence support large or growing hotels seeking operational efficiency. If your focus is on innovative, high-tech check-in methods like holographic or mobile key experiences, and your hotel is smaller or experimental, Fàcil may appeal — though it lacks the review-backed track record.
For hotels prioritizing security, automation, and customer support, Canary’s high satisfaction ratings (4.69/5 support, 4.82/5 ease of use) make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel is early in digital transformation and wants cutting-edge tools without extensive integration needs, Fàcil could fit — but beware of the lack of verified customer feedback.
Canary boasts a user rating of 4.82/5 for ease of use, supported by its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (4.68/5), and a large base of positive recent reviews. Many users praise its straightforward setup, which typically takes about 20 minutes, and its ability to integrate with existing systems smoothly. Support and onboarding are also rated highly at 4.69/5, reinforcing its user-friendly reputation.
Fàcil, while innovative with features like holographic check-in, does not have publicly available review data or user ratings for ease of use. Without this information, it’s difficult to gauge how quickly your staff will adapt or how intuitive the interface will be for your team. Edge: Canary.
Canary offers 21 unique features exclusive to its platform, such as ID verification, document scanning, PCI compliance audits, automatic translations, and hotel website check-in portals. It also provides tools for threat lifecycle management, network security, and multi-lingual support, making it a comprehensive solution for security-conscious hotels.
Fàcil’s core features focus on self-service kiosks, web-app check-in, holographic check-in, and mobile keys—innovative, but less extensive. It lacks the depth of operational and security features found in Canary. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s support is highly rated at 4.69/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Clients frequently mention that Canary’s support team actively helps resolve technical issues, which is critical when deploying a system across multiple properties.
Fàcil provides no publicly available review data or detailed support ratings. Without concrete feedback, we cannot confirm its level of support quality. Based on proven track records, Edge: Canary.
Canary integrates with 54 verified partners, including major property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Vingcard, and HotelTime. Its extensive partner network supports seamless operations across a wide range of hotel types and systems.
Fàcil’s integration count is only five, with limited partner options, including only some basic self-service functionalities. It may require more customization and manual work to connect with your existing tech stack. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s reviews show an average rating of 4.68/5, with 95% of users recommending it and recent reviews confirming ongoing satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes and segments praise its ease of use, support, and ability to increase revenue.
Fàcil lacks publicly available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction reliably. Given the strong, recent feedback for Canary, it’s clearly the more trusted option. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no freemium or trial options, reflecting its enterprise-grade positioning. Fàcil’s pricing details are unavailable, which might suggest a custom quote or less transparent model.
For hotels needing predictable costs and proven ROI, Canary’s transparent pricing provides clarity. Fàcil’s unknown costs make budgeting uncertain, which can be risky without a clear value proposition.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal tech infrastructure, or if you prefer a simple, less feature-heavy solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a mature, integrated platform with proven support and extensive feature depth.
Canary Contactless Check-In is a mature, feature-rich platform supported by extensive reviews, integrations, and proven results across diverse markets. It excels in security, operational efficiency, and revenue growth—making it well-suited for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable solution. Its broad feature set and high user satisfaction guarantee a smoother digital transition.
Fàcil by Arribatec offers innovative tools like holographic check-in and mobile keys, appealing to hotels eager to showcase cutting-edge technology. However, with no review data and limited integrations, it’s better suited for small, experimental properties or those willing to accept a higher risk for a novel experience.
If your hotel values reliability, proven performance, and a comprehensive set of tools, go with Canary. For hotels prioritizing innovation and a unique guest journey, Fàcil could be worth exploring, but with caution.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Canary Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec share 5 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Compliance readiness | ||
| Network security | ||
| PCI compliance audit | ||
| Penetration testing | ||
| Pre-arrival Upselling & Upgrades | ||
| Threat lifecycle management |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Where hoteliers push back
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
While many found Canary's platform user-friendly, several users reported issues with integrating it with their existing Property Management Systems (P... While many found Canary's platform user-friendly, several users reported issues with integrating it with their existing Property Management Systems (PMS) and suggested that enhancements in this area would further smooth operations.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Canary Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Canary Contactless Check-In offers 54 verified integration partners, while Fàcil by Arribatec offers 5. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Canary Contactless Check-In leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Canary Contactless Check-In: No. Fàcil by Arribatec: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Canary Technologies has an HT Score of 100 and Arribatec has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor