The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Arribatec shines , with exclusive features like PCI Compliant and Device Agnostic.
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, Arribatec users most value its , while MyStay users highlight contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #7 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 32 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 2 reviews |
When evaluating contactless check-in solutions, your hotel needs a system that enhances guest experience, streamlines operations, and integrates smoothly into existing workflows. Both Fàcil by Arribatec and MyStay Check-in aim to fulfill these needs, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Fàcil, developed by Arribatec since 2015, offers a suite of digital check-in options with no recent reviews, leaving its current effectiveness uncertain. In contrast, MyStay, with 40 recent reviews and a high overall rating, provides a comprehensive, highly-rated platform backed by active user feedback.
Are you ready to focus on a solution with proven recent performance, or are you willing to consider a less-recently evaluated system with a narrower feature set?
MyStay Check-in emerges as the clear leader for hotels prioritizing recent, high user ratings, extensive features, and proven support. Its 40 reviews in the last six months and an overall 5/5 rating with a 98% likelihood to recommend make it the more reliable choice today. Fàcil, despite its innovative approach, lacks current reviews, making it difficult to assess its present capabilities or customer satisfaction.
If you want a solution with proven customer approval and a broad feature set, go with MyStay. If your hotel seeks a very specific, niche digital check-in method and is willing to take a chance on less recent data, Fàcil might be worth exploring.
Both Fàcil and MyStay aim to modernize the check-in process, but they do so from different starting points. Fàcil emphasizes holographic check-in, self-service kiosks, web apps, and mobile keys, making it ideal for forward-thinking hotels eager to incorporate innovative check-in technologies. MyStay offers a broader suite of functionalities, including contactless check-in/out, online payments, automated guest communication, upselling, and integrations, making it more versatile for hotels seeking an all-in-one guest management platform.
Fàcil's solutions are hardware-driven with a focus on physical check-in methods like holographic displays, which might appeal to hotels wanting a futuristic experience. Meanwhile, MyStay's platform relies on mobile devices, QR codes, and digital forms, aligning better with properties aiming for quick implementation and a contactless experience without substantial hardware investment.
Do you want a system that pushes physical interface innovation or a flexible, fully digital platform for contactless check-in?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, technologically innovative check-in method focusing on holographic or kiosk-based solutions, Fàcil's offerings could be appealing. Its emphasis on device-agnostic solutions and PCI compliance makes it suitable for hotels with existing digital infrastructure looking for a high-tech guest experience.
Conversely, if your hotel values ease of use, comprehensive features like guest segmentation, multi-channel communication, digital payments, and automation, MyStay is the clearly superior choice. Its 30 verified integrations and broad regional presence make it more adaptable for various hotel types, especially those in North America and Europe, with a focus on efficiency and guest satisfaction.
For hotels prioritizing physical check-in hardware and unique guest engagement tech, choose Fàcil. For those seeking an integrated, feature-rich digital platform with proven customer satisfaction, opt for MyStay.
MyStay scores an impressive 4.91/5 for ease of use, backed by 40 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick setup, and seamless onboarding. Guests and staff find it simple to implement, with many noting how rapid the staff can adopt and start using the system effectively. Reviewers also mention the platform's straightforward process for check-ins, check-outs, and automated communications.
Fàcil, on the other hand, has no current reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness today. Given the lack of recent feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay boasts 11 unique features, including guest segmentation and targeting, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel delivery (email, SMS, WhatsApp, chat), offer templates, offer orchestration, digital acceptance and payment capture, and door lock integration. These features support a multifaceted guest engagement strategy, helping your hotel upsell, communicate effectively, and automate guest interactions.
Fàcil offers three core features—self-service kiosks, web apps, holographic check-in, and mobile keys—focusing on physical guest interfaces and innovative check-in methods. It lacks advanced automation, communication, or upselling functionalities present in MyStay.
The clear edge goes to MyStay for its variety and depth of features, especially for hotels seeking an expanded digital guest management system.
MyStay's reviews praise their support team as highly responsive and helpful, emphasizing the platform’s continuous updates and ease of resolving issues. Support is rated at 4.93/5, with comments highlighting prompt technical assistance and ongoing improvements.
Fàcil, with no recent reviews, offers no current data on support quality or onboarding. Its support experience remains unverified, especially considering the absence of recent customer feedback.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including widely used solutions like Oracle Hospitality, Kwentra, and HotelTime, providing extensive options for seamless operation. Its integrations support various PMS, payment, and channel management systems, making it adaptable for diverse hotel tech stacks.
Fàcil has only five verified partners—Hoist Group, Vingcard, Planet, Arribatec, and Vingcard—limiting its integration options and flexibility. Its fewer partnerships mean fewer options for connecting with other hotel systems.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s recent reviews consistently rate it 5/5, with a 98% likelihood of recommendation, indicating high satisfaction among a diverse set of hotel types. The platform’s ease of use, support, and features resonate across hotel segments, especially in Europe and North America, with many users praising its automation and communication tools.
Fàcil has no recent reviews, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. Without current data, it’s impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive the system today.
Edge: MyStay.
Fàcil's pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may have a customized or enterprise-based quote, typical of bespoke solutions. MyStay charges a straightforward base price of $400, with no hidden fees, making it transparent for hotels planning their budgets.
Considering the lack of current pricing info for Fàcil, MyStay's transparent model offers better predictability and value.
Fàcil offers innovative check-in methods with an emphasis on physical interfaces like holographic displays and self-service kiosks. Its focus is on creating a memorable guest engagement experience through hardware-driven solutions.
MyStay, however, provides a comprehensive digital platform with automation, communication, upselling, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction today. Its recent reviews and high ratings give it a clear advantage.
Choose Fàcil if your hotel aims for futuristic, hardware-centric check-in experiences and is prepared for a less-tested current solution. Opt for MyStay if you value a proven, highly-rated, feature-rich platform that actively improves hotel operations and guest experience.
In summary: For your hotel’s contactless check-in needs, MyStay’s recent data, extensive features, and high user satisfaction make it the stronger choice today. Fàcil may appeal if you are seeking a niche, hardware-based experience, but the lack of recent reviews makes its current performance uncertain.
According to HTR's product database, Fàcil by Arribatec and MyStay Check in share 3 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| Offer Templates Library | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Fàcil by Arribatec and MyStay Check in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Fàcil by Arribatec offers 5 verified integration partners, while MyStay Check in offers 30. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Fàcil by Arribatec: No. MyStay Check in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Arribatec has an HT Score of 0 and MyStay has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor