The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 123 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Casablanca shines when it comes to support quality , with exclusive features like Online Check-in and Guest App.
Counter shines when it comes to user interface and usability , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 123 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 66 | 57 |
After analyzing 123 verified reviews, Casablanca users most value its support quality, user-friendliness, continuous improvement, while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Quality
▾
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
+
User-Friendliness
▾
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Additional Costs
▾
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
−
Yield Management and Revenue Optimization
▾
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #21 44 reviews | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #34 14 reviews | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #42 11 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #36 8 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #37 6 reviews | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #33 5 reviews | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #55 2 reviews | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #13 62 reviews | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between Casablanca hotelsoftware (PMS) and Counter hinges on your hotel’s size, target market, and operational complexity. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but Casablanca offers a broad, all-in-one solution focusing on full-scale hotel operations, while Counter is tailored for hostels and small properties emphasizing ease of use and mobility. Your decision should consider not just features but also support, integration, and scalability.
Casablanca is a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS with a solid reputation for support and extensive integrations, while Counter provides a streamlined, mobile-friendly experience designed specifically for hostels. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Casablanca offers a centralized, all-in-one hotel management system with 46 verified partners, including advanced features like online check-in, guest apps, and yield management. Its deep integration capabilities and extensive feature set make it suitable for larger, more complex hotels or chains.
Counter, with its 7 verified integrations and a focus on simplicity, excels in small-scale, budget-friendly properties like hostels. Its mobile-first interface and automated features significantly reduce manual tasks for limited-staff settings.
Both aim to improve operational efficiency, but Casablanca’s robust suite targets full-scale hotel operations, whereas Counter simplifies core processes for hostels. Do your hotel’s needs lean toward extensive customization and scalability, or ease of use and mobility?
If your hotel needs a scalable, fully integrated PMS with a broad feature set supporting multiple properties, go with Casablanca. It’s ideal if you require tools like rate management, digital registration, guest messaging, and extensive reporting, especially for mid-sized to large hotels.
If your focus is on a hostel or small property that values quick onboarding, user-friendly mobile management, and automation—particularly for contactless check-ins—Counter is the better fit. It caters to hostels prioritizing operational simplicity, with features like POS integration and automatic payments.
For multi-property chains or hotels seeking advanced yield management, Casablanca’s your choice. For budget-conscious or small-scale hostels, Counter’s straightforward, mobile approach will likely serve you better.
Casablanca has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.8/5 but is noted for its extensive capabilities, which can introduce some complexity for new staff. Users praise its intuitive interface and quick onboarding (rated 4.74/5), but initially, mastering all features may take time.
Counter scores slightly lower at 4.6/5, reflecting its straightforward, mobile-optimized design that’s easy for staff to learn and adopt. Reviewers highlight its clean interface and simple calendar management, which simplifies daily operations.
Edge: Casablanca. While both are user-friendly, Casablanca’s well-designed interface and high support ratings make it easier for larger teams to efficiently navigate its broader feature set.
Casablanca surpasses Counter significantly in feature count, with 27 exclusive features such as online check-in, guest apps, digital registration, integrated ID scanners, guest messaging, task management, and automated space optimization. It also offers tools tailored to revenue management, GDPR compliance, and in-room check-in options.
Counter provides core PMS functionalities with 6 unique features, including payment processing, housekeeping modules, automated night audit, and multi-lingual support. Its features are focused mainly on operational automation and integration, suitable for budget properties.
Edge: Casablanca. Its extensive suite of features supports complex hotel operations, while Counter’s lean feature set is sufficient for small properties but less adaptable for larger, multi-service hotels.
Casablanca’s support is highly rated at 4.82/5, with reviewers emphasizing rapid, competent responses and support availability even on weekends. Many praise its support team for being customer-oriented and quick to resolve issues.
Counter surpasses that slightly with a 4.96/5 rating, with users highlighting its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Some mention slower responses during off-hours, but overall, support is seen as highly effective.
Edge: Counter. Its slightly higher support rating and positive recent reviews make it the more reliable choice for urgent, ongoing assistance.
Casablanca boasts 46 verified integration partners, including top-tier solutions like Profitroom, Customer Alliance, and Onity, along with shared partners such as SiteMinder and Stripe. These connections enable extensive automation, revenue management, and third-party system integration.
Counter offers 7 verified integrations, including Stripe for payments and Goki for access control, plus shared integrations with Stripe and others. Its ecosystem is smaller but still functional for core hostel operations.
Edge: Casablanca. Its broader range of verified partners facilitates more versatile and scalable integrations, critical for larger properties or chains.
Casablanca has a lower overall rating of 0/5, largely due to its very limited number of recent reviews (2 in the last 6 months), and the rating discrepancy suggests less recent validation. Its NPS score is high at 9.87/10, but the limited feedback makes this less reliable.
Counter, with 54 reviews, maintains a high 4.73/5 overall rating and a stable NPS of 9.02/10, especially among hostel properties, which constitute the majority of its user base. Its recent reviews are more plentiful, indicating current user satisfaction.
Since more recent reviews favor Counter, and its rating reflects consistent performance, edge: Counter.
Pricing for Casablanca is not publicly disclosed, and no free trial is available; it's typically a premium system suited for larger hotels with bigger budgets. Implementation fees and ongoing costs are likely, given its enterprise-level features.
Counter is also not priced publicly, but it’s a free platform, making it attractive for small hostels or budget properties. Some users note potential costs for add-ons or extra integrations, but core usage is free.
Edge: Counter, especially for small properties or hostels seeking an affordable, no-cost solution.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-limited, or prioritizes a simple, mobile setup with minimal tech investment.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, large-scale integrations, or multi-property oversight.
Casablanca is a comprehensive solution suited for mid to large-sized hotels or chains aiming for a fully integrated system with extensive features. Its broad integrations and scalability support sophisticated operations, but its higher complexity and cost make it less suitable for small or budget hotels.
Counter excels in simplicity, mobility, and automation tailored for hostels and small properties. Its free model and focus on core operational automation help reduce manual workload and support quick onboarding, though it lacks the advanced features necessary for larger, multi-property hotels.
Choose Casablanca if your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS with extensive integrations and advanced management tools. It’s best if you have the resources to implement and maintain a complex system.
Opt for Counter if your property is a hostel or small hotel prioritizing ease of use, quick setup, and automation—especially if budget is a concern. It’s ideal for properties that value mobility and straightforward management.
In conclusion, for now, Casablanca’s more recent reviews, higher overall support ratings, and broader feature set make it the stronger choice for larger or more complex hotels. Counter remains a compelling, no-cost option for small properties looking to streamline core operations with minimal fuss.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) and Counter share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight Casablanca's exceptional support, noting quick response times and competent, friendly staff. Users appreciate the availability... Many reviews highlight Casablanca's exceptional support, noting quick response times and competent, friendly staff. Users appreciate the availability of support even on weekends and holidays, which has reassured many hoteliers of continuous, reliable assistance.
Reviews consistently commend Casablanca for its easy-to-use and intuitive interface that allows both seasoned and new employees to quickly get up to s... Reviews consistently commend Casablanca for its easy-to-use and intuitive interface that allows both seasoned and new employees to quickly get up to speed. Some users did point out that as the software evolves, it can sometimes become a bit complex for novice users.
Users appreciate that Casablanca is consistently adding new features and improving its usability based on customer feedback. However, some noted that... Users appreciate that Casablanca is consistently adding new features and improving its usability based on customer feedback. However, some noted that they would like more transparency and timelines for when new functionalities will be implemented.
Where hoteliers push back
A common concern among users is the additional costs associated with updates and new interfaces, which can be problematic for smaller hotel operations... A common concern among users is the additional costs associated with updates and new interfaces, which can be problematic for smaller hotel operations. This aspect was cited as a negative, despite the general satisfaction with the software's features.
Many users emphasize Casablanca's tools for yield management and dynamic pricing as essential for increasing revenue. Features like yield prices, grap... Many users emphasize Casablanca's tools for yield management and dynamic pricing as essential for increasing revenue. Features like yield prices, graphical booking routes, and upselling opportunities contribute to better financial performance.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) offers 46 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS): No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Casablanca has an HT Score of 68 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor