The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ChargeAutomation shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) and Lobby Kiosk.
Trevo shines , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Guest Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 44 | 0 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, ChargeAutomation users most value its payment processing, contactless check-in, customer support, while Trevo users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Payment Processing
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless Check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Reviews
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 5 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 1 reviews | #17 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 9 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 6 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #9 4 reviews | #24 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 19 reviews | #19 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 20 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #5 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right contactless check-in solution for your hotel can significantly influence guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and revenue. Both ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Trevo.ai aim to streamline these processes, but they serve different needs and come with distinct strengths. Your team needs to evaluate which platform aligns best with your property's size, tech infrastructure, and guest experience goals.
While ChargeAutomation boasts a stronger reputation backed by more reviews and recent updates, Trevo's facial recognition and quick check-in features appeal to hotels prioritizing minimal contact and high privacy. Which product will truly meet your specific operational and guest service needs?
ChargeAutomation and Trevo both target contactless check-in, but they approach the problem differently. ChargeAutomation offers an extensive feature set focused on automating check-in, payments, ID verification, and upsells, making it ideal for properties seeking a full-service, customizable platform. Conversely, Trevo specializes in rapid facial recognition and biometric verification, providing a highly secure, quick check-in experience.
ChargeAutomation has accumulated 42 reviews within the last six months, reflecting current user experiences and strong confidence in its capabilities. Trevo, with no recent reviews or user feedback, leaves its actual performance and customer satisfaction more uncertain. Given the recent review activity and higher rating, ChargeAutomation clearly leads in user confidence. Would your hotel benefit more from a broad feature set or a specialized biometric solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-integrate platform for contactless check-in, payment automation, and upselling—especially if you value strong customer support—ChargeAutomation is the clear choice. Its 42 reviews and high ratings (4.9/5 support, 4.71/5 ease of use) reflect a mature, well-supported product suited for mid-sized to large hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes quick, biometric verification and minimal physical contact, and you operate in a region where face recognition is preferred, Trevo's unique technology might appeal. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, it’s a less proven choice for hotel operators seeking reliability and proven results. For most hoteliers, ChargeAutomation’s extensive review history and feature depth make it the safer, more reliable option.
ChargeAutomation scores 4.71 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its user-friendly interface and smooth integration with PMS systems. Customers highlight its straightforward onboarding, with a support rating of 4.9/5, and users report that staff adoption is quick and intuitive. Many reviews mention how simple it is to train staff and how guests find the portal easy to navigate.
Trevo, on the other hand, has no available user ratings or recent reviews, leaving its user experience unverified. Its interface and onboarding process are largely untested in the current market, making it difficult to assess its ease of use. Based on current data, Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation offers 23 unique features, including ID verification, document scanning, custom questions, multilingual support, and PMS integrations—many of which are critical for full contactless check-ins and operational workflows. It also provides advanced payment processing options, digital guidebooks, and upselling tools.
Trevo provides only 8 features, primarily focusing on biometric facial verification, quick check-in, and a few basic upselling options. Its feature set is narrower and lacks many integrations or customization options that are critical for larger properties. For hotel operators seeking a feature-rich platform, ChargeAutomation’s broader capabilities lead the comparison. Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.9/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and attentive service. Guests and staff alike find onboarding smooth, and support staff are praised for listening to custom requests and implementing changes promptly.
Trevo lacks recent user reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge its customer service quality. Without verified feedback, ChargeAutomation’s proven support infrastructure clearly holds the advantage. Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation boasts 18 verified partners, including major PMS and payment providers like Oracle Hospitality, Stripe, and others. Its extensive integration network ensures compatibility with many existing hotel systems, simplifying deployment.
Trevo has only 8 verified integrations, primarily with systems like SALTO, Infor, and Adyen. While these are useful, the smaller network may limit flexibility for hotels with complex or diverse tech stacks. For most properties, the broader integration options of ChargeAutomation provide a significant advantage. Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s review count of 42 and recent feedback indicate a high level of satisfaction, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a 4.9/5 customer support score. Hotels across segments, especially vacation rentals and extended stays, praise its ease of use and operational support.
Trevo, with no recent reviews, offers no current data to evaluate user ratings or satisfaction. The absence of recent feedback makes it difficult to judge its reliability or hotel preference. Given the recent review activity and high satisfaction scores, ChargeAutomation clearly outperforms. Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation charges a flat fee of $200 per month, with no trial, freemium, or implementation fees. Its transparent pricing and straightforward model make budgeting easier.
Trevo does not publicly disclose pricing details, and with no recent reviews or user feedback, the actual costs are unclear. This lack of transparency complicates comparison. Based on available data, ChargeAutomation provides a clear and predictable pricing structure.
Not ideal if you have a very small property with minimal tech needs or prefer a biometric-only solution.
Not ideal if you require extensive integrations, proven reliability, or comprehensive contactless features beyond biometric verification.
ChargeAutomation provides an all-in-one, feature-rich platform with high user confidence, making it ideal for hotels looking for a proven, scalable contactless check-in system. Its broad set of features, strong support, and extensive integrations suit mid to large properties seeking operational efficiency and revenue growth.
Trevo offers rapid biometric verification, appealing to niche hotels prioritizing high privacy and minimal contact. However, with no recent reviews or proven support, its suitability is more limited for hotels needing reliable, full-scale solutions.
For most hoteliers, ChargeAutomation’s proven track record and comprehensive capabilities position it as the better choice. If biometric speed and privacy are your top priorities, and you’re willing to accept the uncertainty, Trevo may be worth exploring further—but only after thorough testing.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Trevo.ai share 7 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| App download | ||
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| Payments | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it mini... The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it minimizes fraud and error, saving time and reducing labor costs. Payment automation facilitates smoother operations and enhances financial security for both hotels and guests.
ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to co... ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to complete check-in remotely, reducing front desk traffic and wait times. This feature is especially beneficial in minimizing manual work, improving operational efficiency, and creating a better guest experience.
While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional sup... While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional support personnel. Good support is crucial for resolving issues quickly, thereby affecting the overall experience.
Where hoteliers push back
A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest po... A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest portal, email formats, and other interfaces. This lack of flexibility can impact how well the software meets specific needs of different properties.
Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms a... Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms about its PMS connectivity. Users report issues like synchrony problems and the need for more flexible information transfer capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Trevo.ai share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in offers 18 verified integration partners, while Trevo.ai offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ChargeAutomation Online Check-in: No. Trevo.ai: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ChargeAutomation has an HT Score of 24 and Trevo has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor