The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ChargeAutomation shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Zaplox shines , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile Checkin.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 44 | 3 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, ChargeAutomation users most value its payment processing, contactless check-in, customer support, while Zaplox users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Payment Processing
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless Check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Reviews
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | #23 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | #13 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 5 reviews | #21 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 1 reviews | #15 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 9 reviews | #14 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 6 reviews | #17 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #9 4 reviews | #12 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 19 reviews | #11 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 20 reviews | #14 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #5 2 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
Choosing a contactless check-in solution for your hotel involves weighing automation, ease of use, support, and integration capabilities. ChargeAutomation’s online check-in platform and Zaplox’s self-service kiosk both aim to reduce front desk workload and enhance guest experience but differ significantly in features, market presence, and reviews. Your decision should be based on your hotel’s specific needs, technology infrastructure, and guest preferences.
ChargeAutomation offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a broad feature set and a larger, more recent review base, making it a more established option. Zaplox provides a simple, hardware-agnostic kiosk solution popular among budget properties and hostels, but with fewer recent reviews. Which aligns better with your property’s operational goals?
Both ChargeAutomation and Zaplox target contactless check-in and aim to streamline operations, but they approach the problem from different angles. ChargeAutomation is an all-in-one solution with extensive automation features like ID verification, upselling, and secure payments, suitable for hotels that want a full digital onboarding process. Zaplox’s kiosk is primarily hardware-based, focusing on reducing front desk traffic with self-check-in and check-out on tablets or kiosks, ideal for properties prioritizing physical self-service stations.
ChargeAutomation’s 42 reviews in the last six months and a near-perfect 98% likelihood to recommend indicate a more recent and active user base, compared to Zaplox’s 3 reviews and 80% recommendation rate. This suggests ChargeAutomation’s platform is more trusted and tested in current market conditions. Are you looking for a robust software platform with ongoing support, or a straightforward kiosk system?
If your hotel needs a digital platform that automates multiple aspects of guest onboarding—such as ID verification, pre-arrival upselling, and seamless PMS integration—ChargeAutomation is the clear choice. It’s better suited for properties with higher guest volume or those looking to expand digital services beyond basic check-in.
Conversely, if your hotel is a hostel, budget property, or has limited tech infrastructure, Zaplox’s kiosk might be more appropriate. Its focus on hardware-based self-service check-in/out and mobile key support makes it ideal for properties aiming to quickly reduce frontline staff and streamline guest flow with minimal integration complexity.
ChargeAutomation scores 4.71/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, seamless PMS integration, and quick onboarding process. Users report that staff adoption is smooth, and the platform’s automation reduces manual work significantly. The platform’s comprehensive knowledge base and support responsiveness further ease implementation.
Zaplox scores slightly lower at 4.17/5, with reviews praising its stability and straightforward operation, especially for mobile keys and kiosks. However, some users note challenges with the speed of the kiosk and the need for frequent technical updates and support, which can hinder ease of use over time.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation boasts 21 unique features, including PCI compliance, multiple credit card processing options, automatic translations, document scanning, and pre-arrival upselling, making it a versatile all-in-one platform. These features support complex workflows, high-volume bookings, and security requirements.
Zaplox offers 16 features, notably mobile keys, guest messaging, notifications, and web-based kiosk operations, focusing on physical self-service and mobile access. While its feature set is strong for basic self-check-in, it lacks advanced automation features like security deposits or document verification.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s support is rated 4.9/5, with reviews highlighting quick, friendly, and knowledgeable service that responds rapidly to inquiries. One reviewer noted, “Customer service department is always speedy to respond, making questions quick and painless,” which underscores strong ongoing support.
Zaplox’s support is rated 3/5, with reviews pointing out issues like developer turnover and slow project completion. One user said, “The long path to project completion due to developer changes impacted our experience,” indicating support inconsistencies.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation integrates with 18 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and RoomRaccoon, enabling flexible connectivity with existing hotel systems. It also supports integrations with various payment gateways, door lock systems, and online travel agencies.
Zaplox supports 17 verified partners, including PMS systems like Stayntouch and dormakaba, with a focus on hardware integrations for lock and access control. Its slightly narrower partner list may limit complex or custom integrations for some hotels.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s reviews reflect a broader and more recent user base, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a high overall rating. Hoteliers praise its automation capabilities, ease of setup, and support, especially in larger properties or those looking for a full digital onboarding.
Zaplox’s reviews, though positive about ease of use and stability, are fewer and less recent, with some complaints about developer churn and project delays. Its user base seems more concentrated in hostels and budget hotels, where simple self-service and mobile keys suffice.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s pricing starts at $200 per month, with no freemium or trial options, making it straightforward for hotels willing to invest upfront. Its all-in-one nature justifies the price for properties needing extensive automation.
Zaplox does not list specific pricing but emphasizes that there are no implementation fees or monthly flat rates. Its hardware-based kiosk model may incur additional costs for tablets or lock systems but offers a potentially lower entry point for smaller properties.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited digital infrastructure, or primarily budget-focused without the need for extensive automation.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced guest verification, upselling, or complex integrations.
ChargeAutomation provides a full-featured, automation-driven platform with extensive integrations, robust security, and high user satisfaction. It’s best suited for larger hotels, vacation rentals, and properties looking to scale digital onboarding and revenue opportunities.
Zaplox’s kiosk offers a straightforward, hardware-agnostic solution that simplifies front desk operations, ideal for budget, hostel, or small-scale properties seeking quick deployment with mobile key support. Its limited feature set and fewer recent reviews make it less suitable for complex or high-volume operations.
If you need a scalable, feature-rich platform with ongoing support and broad integrations, ChargeAutomation is the clear choice. For properties focused on basic self-service and mobile key convenience, Zaplox is a viable, cost-effective option.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Zaplox Self-service Kiosk share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Keyless Entry | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway | ||
| Notifications | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| Remote Checkin | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Whitelabel Capability |
Showing top differences. 25 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it mini... The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it minimizes fraud and error, saving time and reducing labor costs. Payment automation facilitates smoother operations and enhances financial security for both hotels and guests.
ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to co... ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to complete check-in remotely, reducing front desk traffic and wait times. This feature is especially beneficial in minimizing manual work, improving operational efficiency, and creating a better guest experience.
While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional sup... While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional support personnel. Good support is crucial for resolving issues quickly, thereby affecting the overall experience.
Where hoteliers push back
A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest po... A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest portal, email formats, and other interfaces. This lack of flexibility can impact how well the software meets specific needs of different properties.
Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms a... Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms about its PMS connectivity. Users report issues like synchrony problems and the need for more flexible information transfer capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Zaplox Self-service Kiosk share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in offers 18 verified integration partners, while Zaplox Self-service Kiosk offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.2/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ChargeAutomation Online Check-in: No. Zaplox Self-service Kiosk: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ChargeAutomation has an HT Score of 24 and Zaplox has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor