The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acantech shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Acantech users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Chr365 by Acantech and Mews PMS aim to simplify your daily tasks, but they diverge sharply in maturity, user reception, and capabilities. Is your team ready to adopt a system that’s proven to support modern hospitality or one still establishing its presence?
Chr365 offers a solution that’s less documented and reviewed, while Mews has a proven track record with over 750 recent reviews and a near-perfect rating. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
Chr365 by Acantech is a relatively unknown player with zero reviews and a very limited market presence, primarily serving niche or small-scale operators. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 9.12/10 NPS score, reflecting broad trust and recent positive experiences from users worldwide.
While Chr365 claims to address property management needs, its lack of user feedback and absence of verified integrations or extensive feature sets make it difficult to evaluate its real-world utility. Mews, however, offers a cloud-native, feature-rich platform that streamlines operations and enhances guest experiences, proven through constant positive reviews.
Are you comfortable choosing an untested system, or do you prefer the confidence that comes with a well-reviewed leader?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable solution with extensive integrations, choose Mews. Its ecosystem includes over 336 verified partners, supporting everything from channel management to revenue optimization, and it’s trusted by hospitality brands across the globe.
If your hotel operates on a very small scale or in a niche market where minimal features suffice, Chr365 might seem appealing — but the lack of reviews or proven performance makes this a risky choice. For any hotel seeking a mature, well-supported PMS, Mews is the clear winner.
For hoteliers prioritizing operational automation, guest engagement, and future-proofing, Mews’s extensive capabilities make it the logical pick. Chr365, lacking evidence of effectiveness or support, appears unsuitable for hotels looking to grow or modernize.
Mews scores highly for user-friendliness, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating from verified reviews. Users highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding, with many noting they can set up the platform within days and train staff easily.
Chr365, on the other hand, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its limited documentation and absence of user feedback suggest a less polished, less user-friendly product.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, channel manager, integrated POS, automation tools, and real-time reporting. These features are designed to support a full-scale, modern hotel operation and are regularly updated.
Chr365 provides no verified features or differentiators, which raises questions about its capabilities. Without a clear feature set or user validation, it’s impossible to compare it meaningfully to Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support system has a reputation for responsiveness, with a 4.27/5 support rating from users who appreciate their quick resolution times and active customer success teams. Many reviewers mention that Mews support helps them implement new features effectively and troubleshoot efficiently.
Chr365, with no reviews or support ratings available, cannot be confidently evaluated. The lack of feedback suggests limited support options, which could be a concern for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, covering channel management, payment providers, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and Marketplace enable seamless connectivity, allowing hotels to customize their tech stacks.
Chr365 has no publicly verified integrations or partner list, limiting its utility in multi-system environments. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent, over 98 in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend, across diverse property types including boutique hotels, hostels, and large brands. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with many noting measurable operational improvements.
Chr365 has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or confidence. The absence of feedback significantly diminishes its credibility compared to Mews’s proven track record.
Edge: Mews.
Chr365’s pricing is unavailable, which is common among less-established systems. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or optional charges, providing predictable costs.
The lack of transparent pricing for Chr365 hampers your ability to evaluate ROI, whereas Mews’s clear pricing structure supports budget planning and value assessment.
Given the lack of reviews and features, Chr365 is best suited for very small-scale operations with limited future expansion ambitions.
Mews’s versatility and extensive feature set make it suitable across virtually all hotel types aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Mews stands out as the more mature, reviewed, and feature-rich solution with a broad ecosystem and proven customer satisfaction. Chr365’s lack of reviews, features, and integrations makes it a risky choice for hotels serious about growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable platform backed by recent positive reviews, go with Mews. Its extensive features, support, and integrations justify its higher price point and make it the smarter long-term investment.
Choose Chr365 only if your requirements are minimal, your budget is tight, and you’re comfortable with the unknown. For most hoteliers, Mews is the safer, more capable choice to support today’s demands and tomorrow’s growth.
According to HTR's product database, Chr365 and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Chr365 and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Chr365 offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Chr365: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acantech has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor