The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acantech shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Acantech users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue potential. Both Chr365 by Acantech and protel PMS by Planet aim to streamline hotel management, but their offerings and maturity differ significantly. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize extensive features, proven reliability, and recent user feedback or a more basic, less-reviewed option. Are you ready to dive into the details?
Chr365 by Acantech is a newer entrant with no recent reviews or user ratings, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance and user satisfaction. In contrast, protel PMS has over 105 reviews, with recent feedback from the last six months reinforcing its standing, especially with an 80% likelihood to recommend. The current data favors protel’s more established reputation.
Both systems aim to manage reservations, guest data, and operations, but protel’s extensive experience and active user base give it a tangible edge. Chr365’s lack of reviews makes it a riskier choice unless you’re comfortable with less proven technology. Do you want a system backed by recent user feedback or one that’s still relatively untested in the wild?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, reliable PMS with a track record of user satisfaction, go with protel. Its robust platform is suitable for mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and chains looking for an adaptable system with extensive integrations and proven support.
However, if your hotel is smaller, less complex, and willing to take a chance on a newer solution, Chr365 might appeal—though it lacks the recent reviews to confirm its effectiveness. For hotels that prioritize tested reliability and a broad ecosystem, protel remains the clear choice.
Protel’s user rating of 4.12/5 and recent reviews mention its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding experience. Hoteliers praise its ease of navigation, report generation, and management functions, which facilitate staff adoption.
Chr365’s usability is unverified due to the absence of reviews, but its lack of user feedback suggests it may not have the same clarity or maturity. Given protel’s high rating and active support, edge: protel PMS.
Protel offers over 46 features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, integrated booking engine, guest CRM, shift planning, real-time reporting, and advanced automation tools—features that Chr365 does not specify or seem to lack. Its extensive ecosystem supports automation and scalability for multiple hotel types.
Chr365’s feature set remains unconfirmed, making protel’s comprehensive offering the safer, more capable choice. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel’s support ratings are close to 4/5, with recent reviews describing its 24/7 multilingual support and responsive service, despite some complaints about response times. Users appreciate its proactive assistance in resolving issues and onboarding.
Chr365 provides no review data about support quality, leaving its reliability in question. With a proven track record, protel’s support is the clear winner. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel boasts over 1,200 verified integrations, including PMS, channel managers, revenue tools, and POS systems. Many hotels rely on its extensive ecosystem to connect their technology stack seamlessly.
Chr365 offers no known integrations or partner data, limiting its ability to connect with third-party applications. For hotels needing extensive, proven system integration, protel is the obvious choice. Edge: protel PMS.
Since Chr365 has no reviews, direct hotel ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. In contrast, protel’s latest reviews show an overall 4.11/5 rating, with high marks for functionality and support, especially from independent and branded hotels.
Recent reviews reinforce protel’s strong reputation, while Chr365’s lack of feedback poses unknown risks. Clearly, protel is better rated by actual users. Edge: protel PMS.
Chr365’s pricing is not publicly available, which often indicates custom or undisclosed pricing models. Conversely, protel’s base price is $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, but it provides detailed pricing transparency.
If budget is a concern, note that Chr365’s costs are unclear, while protel’s predictable pricing allows for better financial planning. Edge: protel PMS.
The core difference is that protel PMS is an established platform with a large user base, extensive features, and recent reviews validating its performance. Chr365, on the other hand, lacks user feedback, making its capabilities and support less clear.
If your hotel values proven performance, extensive integrations, and recent user satisfaction, go with protel. Its ability to support complex operations and large-scale properties makes it the safer, more reliable choice.
However, if your hotel is small, simple, and willing to explore a less-reviewed option, Chr365 might be worth considering—but only with caution. The risk of limited support and unverified features favors protel for most hotels needing stability and growth potential.
This comparison offers a clear perspective: protel’s recent reviews, larger feature set, and proven support make it the logical choice for hotels seeking a dependable, scalable PMS. Chr365 remains an untested option, better suited for very small properties or hotels willing to take a gamble on unproven technology.
According to HTR's product database, Chr365 and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Chr365 and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Chr365 offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Chr365: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acantech has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor