The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acantech shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Acantech users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Currently, RMS by RMS outperforms Chr365 by Acantech in reviews, recent feedback, and regional presence. RMS’s extensive feature set and positive hotel feedback make it a compelling choice, especially for hotels seeking a scalable and reliable platform. But does RMS truly meet your specific needs better than Chr365? Let’s explore.
Both Chr365 and RMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ vastly in maturity, regional presence, and feature depth. Chr365, developed by Acantech, appears to be a newer or less established platform, with no reviews or ratings available, and no recent data to support its performance. RMS, by contrast, boasts over 293 reviews, with recent ratings averaging 4.56 out of 5, indicating ongoing, active user engagement and satisfaction.
While RMS provides a broad suite of 74 features, Chr365 offers no verified features or integrations, which suggests RMS may deliver more tangible value for hotels with complex needs. Do you want a proven platform with extensive support and a track record? Or are you exploring options with limited available data and fewer features? RMS’s market presence across 22 countries and its active hotel user base make it the more dependable choice today.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable PMS capable of managing multiple properties, RMS is the clear winner. Its large, recent review base and 4.56-star rating reflect a platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide, including RV parks, resorts, and boutique hotels. RMS’s strengths include its trust accounting, integrated channel management, and a guest portal that enhances guest interactions.
Conversely, Chr365’s limited or nonexistent review data suggests it’s less proven at scale. If your hotel is smaller, less complex, or open to trying newer solutions, Chr365 might be worth exploring—but RMS’s proven track record makes it the safer, more reliable investment for most hotels. If you prioritize proven performance, RMS is the better fit.
RMS scores a 4.28 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by detailed positive reviews emphasizing its user-friendly booking chart, intuitive interface, and quick onboarding. Support staff are praised for their helpfulness, with many reviews highlighting prompt, knowledgeable assistance, making staff adoption smoother. RMS’s onboarding process averages a solid 4.12 out of 5, indicating a manageable learning curve for new users.
Chr365, however, has no published ratings or recent reviews, leaving its ease of use unverified. Without user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge how quickly your team can adopt it or how intuitive the interface might be. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers an extensive array of 74 features, including integrated CRS, online booking engine, payment processing, revenue management, guest CRM, group booking, POS integration, and automated reporting — features Chr365 does not publicly provide or verify. This depth supports hotels with complex operations, large groups, or multi-property portfolios.
Chr365’s feature set is unlisted, and no verified features are available, making it hard to compare. Given RMS’s broad feature count and proven integrations, it clearly holds the advantage. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support receives high marks, with a 4.48 out of 5 rating and recent positive reviews citing fast, knowledgeable assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Customers like Lafayette Hotels and Roomzzz praise RMS’s proactive support, which helps reduce operational disruptions.
Chr365 provides no public support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without proven support data, RMS’s support reputation gives it a decisive edge. Edge: RMS.
RMS integrates with over 112 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and channel managers, facilitating seamless operations across platforms. Shared integrations and extensive partner networks make RMS adaptable for hotels with existing systems or specific operational needs.
Chr365 shows no verified integrations or partner list, limiting its appeal for hotels requiring extensive third-party connectivity. RMS’s proven integration ecosystem ensures smoother, more reliable operations. Edge: RMS.
With 293 recent reviews, RMS’s average rating of 4.56 out of 5 reflects broad, recent hotel satisfaction across diverse segments, from boutique to RV parks. Hotels highlight its usability, support, and feature depth as key strengths.
Chr365, lacking reviews, cannot be rated or compared on hotel satisfaction. RMS’s strong recent feedback makes it the more trusted choice for hoteliers. Edge: RMS.
RMS charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no free trial or detailed onboarding costs publicly available. Chr365’s pricing is undisclosed, making direct cost comparisons impossible.
If budget transparency is crucial, RMS’s known pricing provides clarity, but your hotel should consider the value delivered by its extensive feature set. Chr365’s costs, if any, remain unknown.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust features, integrations, or scalability, as Chr365’s capabilities are unverified and less proven.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget or prefers a minimal, no-frills system, given RMS’s higher price point and feature depth.
RMS offers a comprehensive, well-supported platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide, with a proven track record and extensive features. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm it’s the more reliable choice for hotels needing a scalable, feature-rich PMS.
Chr365 may suit smaller or simpler properties, or hotels willing to experiment with less proven solutions, but the lack of recent reviews and features makes it a riskier investment. RMS’s established presence, support, and feature set strongly favor it for most hotels today.
If your hotel values a trusted, full-featured system with active hotel feedback, RMS is the clear winner. If you prefer testing a less documented platform and operate a small property, Chr365 might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
According to HTR's product database, Chr365 and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Chr365 and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Chr365 offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Chr365: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acantech has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor