The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acantech shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Acantech users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Chr365 by Acantech and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and your operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ dramatically in maturity, features, and market presence. Acantech’s Chr365 offers little data, no recent reviews, and no ratings, making it an uncertain choice. Meanwhile, Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a substantial, recent review footprint, with high ratings for ease of use, support, and value. Which system will truly serve your hotel best?
Chr365 by Acantech is virtually unreviewed, with no recent user feedback or ratings, making it impossible to assess its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS has 32 recent reviews, a solid NPS score of 8.94/10, and a 74.69 score on HotelTechReport, signifying broad user confidence. Its strengths lie in ease of use, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations, which are well-documented and supported by user reviews. Are you comfortable adopting a system without clear user validation, or do you prefer proven solutions supported by current hoteliers?
If your hotel requires a stable, feature-rich PMS with proven user satisfaction, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. Its 32 recent reviews and high ratings across support, onboarding, and ease of use make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and a digital edge. If you are considering Chr365, be cautious, as it’s practically unreviewed, which raises questions about its maturity, reliability, and ongoing support.
For hotels focused on international scalability and seamless integrations, Shiji’s 64 verified partners and global presence make it an obvious pick. Smaller boutique hotels or startups might consider Chr365 only if they are willing to take a risk on an untested platform, but the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence.
Shiji Daylight PMS earns a near-perfect user rating of 4.63/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward training materials, and minimal learning curve. Reviewers highlight how quickly new team members adapt and how the platform simplifies daily tasks, reducing operational friction. In contrast, Chr365 has no user ratings or reviews, leaving its usability status entirely unknown. Would you prefer to rely on a system with demonstrated user satisfaction?
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Shiji Daylight PMS offers an extensive suite of 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, housekeeping modules, rate management, and automation tools. Chr365 provides no publicly available features, making it impossible to compare their capabilities directly. Given the complexity of hotel operations today, an extensive feature set is vital.
Shiji’s feature diversity supports a wide range of operational needs, from automation to guest engagement, whereas Chr365’s lack of data suggests it may be limited or untested. If your hotel needs comprehensive, proven features, Shiji is the clear winner.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Shiji Daylight PMS earns a customer support rating of 4.53/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive onboarding. Hoteliers praise the support team’s professionalism, which minimizes downtime and accelerates implementation. Chr365 offers no recent reviews or support ratings, so its service quality remains uncertain.
Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, the high support score for Shiji suggests a lower risk of operational disruptions. Do you want to trust a system with proven, highly rated support or gamble on an unreviewed platform?
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
With 32 recent reviews and a 74.69/100 overall score, hoteliers rate Shiji Daylight PMS highly across key categories: ease of use, support, onboarding, and value. Hotels of various sizes and segments, particularly luxury and branded hotels, enthusiastically recommend it, citing its user-friendliness and comprehensive features. Chr365 lacks reviews, ratings, or recent hotel feedback, so no comparative data exists.
The recent positive reviews for Shiji indicate strong market acceptance and satisfaction. Would you prefer a system endorsed by current hotel users or one with no publicly available user feedback?
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS
Chr365’s pricing details are entirely unavailable; it might be a bespoke or unpriced solution, which complicates budgeting and decision-making. Shiji Daylight PMS’s base annual price is $1,200, with no mention of hidden fees or ongoing costs, making it easier for hotels to forecast expenses.
Cost transparency and predictable pricing are crucial for hotel budgets. If your hotel values clarity, Shiji’s straightforward pricing model offers peace of mind, whereas Chr365’s opaque cost structure could pose challenges.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Shiji Daylight PMS is a mature, feature-rich, and well-supported platform trusted by hundreds of hotels across the globe. It stands out thanks to its ease of use, extensive integrations, and positive recent reviews, making it a dependable choice for operational efficiency. Chr365, on the other hand, offers no recent user feedback or demonstrated capabilities, making it an uncertain and risky option.
Choose Shiji if your hotel values proven reliability, extensive features, and strong support. If you are willing to take a chance on an unreviewed system with no clear track record, Chr365 might be worth exploring, but it’s a gamble.
For hotels prioritizing stability, proven functionality, and a system endorsed by current users, Shiji’s mature platform is the clear recommendation. Only hotels willing to risk unverified performance should consider Chr365 at this stage.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Acantech |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Chr365 and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Chr365 and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Chr365 offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 65. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Chr365: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acantech has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property