The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 120 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CiHMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Mobile App.
ICG FrontHotel shines , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 120 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 120 | 0 |
After analyzing 120 verified reviews, CiHMS users most value its operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management, while ICG FrontHotel users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #45 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #20 31 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 43 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 83 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 40 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 15 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #65 0 reviews | — |
| Europe | #58 2 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 117 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #24 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and ICG FrontHotel by ICG FrontHotel comes down to your hotel’s specific needs, regional presence, and the features that matter most. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their capabilities, user feedback, and market focus diverge significantly. Your team should evaluate which platform aligns best with your operational priorities and growth plans.
While ICG FrontHotel has a longer-standing presence globally, CiHMS’s recent surge in reviews and high user satisfaction clearly position it as the more tested and trusted solution in the current market. Do you want a more established, highly-rated platform, or are you exploring options with broader integration and coverage?
CiHMS currently outperforms ICG FrontHotel in critical review metrics: it boasts 101 recent reviews, a 4.92/5 customer support rating, and a 98% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high user satisfaction. ICG FrontHotel, lacking review data and not rated, cannot match the proven reputation of CiHMS.
If your hotel needs a highly rated, user-friendly system with extensive support and proven operational improvements, CiHMS is the clear choice. Conversely, ICG FrontHotel’s broader set of features and international presence may appeal if you prioritize specific functionalities or regional expansion.
CiHMS stands out with a remarkable 4.9/5 ease of use rating, supported by positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Users praise how easy it is to learn and operate, even during busy periods, with many noting quick onboarding and minimal training needs.
In contrast, ICG FrontHotel’s user experience data is unavailable, making it impossible to assess its usability. The absence of recent reviews further hampers confidence in its user-friendliness.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 11 features exclusive to its platform, including a Spa & Wellness Module, Channel Manager, Revenue Management, Booking Engine, and Mobile App, making it highly versatile for complex hotel operations. These features are designed to streamline revenue, operations, and guest services in one integrated system.
ICG FrontHotel provides 15 unique features, such as Transactional Emails, Native Email Marketing, Guest CRM, Automated Reminders, and Online Check-in. While these facilitate guest engagement and operational automation, they are more focused on guest communication and mobile check-in processes.
Edge: CiHMS, for its broader suite of operational modules and strategic management tools.
CiHMS scores an outstanding 4.92/5 in support and onboarding, with reviews commending its professional, responsive team and helpful training resources. Clients appreciate how support minimizes downtime and ensures smooth system adoption.
ICG FrontHotel lacks recent review data, leaving support quality unverified and uncertain. Without user feedback or ratings, it’s difficult to gauge the level of assistance offered.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with 3 verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, focusing on core distribution and channel management. Its limited but targeted integrations may suffice for hotels prioritizing simplicity.
ICG FrontHotel boasts 12 verified partners, including major players like Dingus, RoomCloud, and RateGain, offering a wider range of direct integrations with payment systems, PMS, and distribution platforms. This makes it more adaptable for hotels seeking extensive connectivity.
Edge: ICG FrontHotel.
With 101 reviews, CiHMS’s user ratings are recent and consistent, giving it a high reputation across various hotel segments. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and operational impact, with a 98% likelihood to recommend.
ICG FrontHotel has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property-specific preferences. The lack of current feedback diminishes confidence in its overall performance.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS costs a flat $900 per month with no free trial or implementation fees, offering a straightforward pricing model. ICG FrontHotel’s pricing is not publicly available, which complicates direct cost comparison.
Given the transparent pricing, CiHMS provides clarity for budgeting, while ICG FrontHotel may require direct inquiry for quotes.
Not ideal if your hotel is in North America or Europe, or if you require extensive third-party integrations outside CiHMS’s current partners.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers highly rated, extensively supported solutions or is located in regions outside ICG FrontHotel’s primary markets.
CiHMS is a well-established, highly-rated PMS that excels in ease of use, support, and core hotel management features. Its recent review volume and high satisfaction score make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
ICG FrontHotel offers a broad set of features with numerous integrations, appealing for hotels that require extensive guest communication tools and mobile functionalities. However, the lack of recent reviews and ratings reduces confidence in its current performance.
If your hotel’s priorities are operational stability, support, and proven performance, go with CiHMS. If you need a wide array of guest engagement features and extensive third-party integration, consider ICG FrontHotel—but only if you can verify support and performance firsthand.
In conclusion, CiHMS’s high review count, recent positive feedback, and proven track record make it the best choice for most hotels today. ICG FrontHotel’s broader feature set might suit specific needs, but its lack of current user data makes it a riskier pick at this stage.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, CiHMS and ICG Fronthotel share 22 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reminders | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 14 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CiHMS and ICG Fronthotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CiHMS offers 3 verified integration partners, while ICG Fronthotel offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CiHMS: No. ICG Fronthotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CiHMS has an HT Score of 81 and ICG FrontHotel has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor