The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 49 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Civitfun shines , with exclusive features like Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Payment & Authorizations.
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Side-by-side ratings based on 49 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 6 | 43 |
After analyzing 49 verified reviews, Civitfun users most value its , while MyStay users highlight contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 2 reviews | #5 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 3 reviews | #6 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 2 reviews | #5 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #25 0 reviews | #4 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #18 1 reviews | #5 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #7 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #12 4 reviews | #4 32 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 2 reviews |
| Middle East | #7 1 reviews | #4 2 reviews |
Choosing between Civitfun by Civitfun and MyStay Check-in by MyStay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for contactless check-in. Both solutions aim to streamline guest onboarding, but they approach the task differently—Civitfun emphasizes automation and integrations, while MyStay focuses on ease of use and guest communication. Your decision should consider your hotel type, operational goals, and the importance of features like integrations and user experience.
Civitfun offers more extensive feature options and a broader global presence, but MyStay boasts a significantly larger and more recent review base with higher ratings. Which of these factors aligns better with your priorities?
Both Civitfun and MyStay serve the same core purpose—facilitating contactless check-in—but they do so with different strengths. Civitfun provides a suite of tools with 11 unique features, including customizable check-in portals, ID verification, and pre-arrival upselling, making it suitable for hotels seeking comprehensive automation. Conversely, MyStay focuses on guest communication and operational efficiency, with 10 exclusive features like PMS integration and multi-channel messaging.
While Civitfun's software is more feature-rich, it has a smaller, less recent review footprint—only four reviews, all from 2023, with a neutral overall rating of 0/5. MyStay, however, has 40 reviews, all recent, with a perfect 5/5 rating, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Given the limited data on Civitfun, the clearer choice leans toward MyStay for confidence and proven performance. Are you prioritizing extensive features or reliable user feedback?
If your hotel needs a contactless check-in solution that integrates smoothly with your PMS and offers multi-channel communication, go with MyStay. Its 30 verified integrations, including major PMS providers and channel managers, make it an adaptable choice for properties aiming for operational efficiency. It’s especially suited for hotels seeking a simple, fast onboarding experience with a proven track record.
If, instead, your hotel requires advanced customization options—like ID verification, multi-lingual portals, or pre-arrival upselling—Civitfun may be the better fit. Its feature set caters to hotels wanting to automate complex check-in processes and deploy extensive branding or personalization, despite its limited review data. For hotels striving for quick implementation and high user satisfaction, MyStay edges out as the more reliable option.
Both products are rated highly for ease of use, with Civitfun earning 4/5 and MyStay a near-perfect 4.91/5. Reviews highlight MyStay’s intuitive interface and quick onboarding as key strengths, with users praising its straightforward setup and effective automation. Civitfun’s UI is described as user-friendly, but some reviews note a learning curve related to its broader feature set.
Support ratings are tight: Civitfun scores 4/5, while MyStay’s 4.93/5 reflects its strong customer service reputation. Many users mention that MyStay’s onboarding is smooth, and the platform’s automation features are easy to configure. Edge: MyStay.
Civitfun offers 11 features exclusive to its platform, including a hotel website check-in portal, ID verification, device agnosticism, and pre-arrival upselling—making it stand out for customization and automation. MyStay provides 10 unique features such as PMS integration, multi-channel communication, guest segmentation, and offer testing, focusing on operational and marketing efficiencies.
Shared features include four core tools like online check-in, guest communication, and digital document signing, but Civitfun’s specialized tools might appeal to properties with complex needs, while MyStay’s features streamline daily operations. The decision depends on whether your hotel values automation depth or guest engagement tools. Edge: Civitfun for customization; MyStay for operational features.
Customer support ratings favor MyStay, with a 4.93/5 score based on recent reviews, compared to Civitfun’s 4/5. Users frequently comment on the quick responsiveness and helpfulness of MyStay’s team, citing prompt technical assistance and ongoing updates. Many reviewers highlight that MyStay’s support team actively listens and implements feedback.
Civitfun’s support is rated slightly lower, with some users noting difficulty in communication post-sale and limited responsiveness, particularly in international markets. Given the critical role of support in implementation and ongoing use, edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 30 verified integrations, surpassing Civitfun’s 21, including key PMS, channel managers, and payment providers. Shared integrations with Winhotel, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews help hoteliers connect systems smoothly, but MyStay’s broader partner network provides more options for diverse tech environments.
Civitfun’s integrations cover essential PMS and door hardware providers, but its smaller partner ecosystem limits flexibility for some hotels. If extensive integrations are vital to your property’s tech stack, MyStay clearly leads. Edge: MyStay.
MyStay enjoys a perfect 5/5 rating from 39 recent reviews, with users praising its ease, reliability, and efficiency across various hotel segments, especially serviced apartments and boutique hotels. Civitfun, with only four reviews, offers a mixed 0/5 rating, with one review explicitly warning about transparency issues and poor post-sale support.
The stark contrast indicates that hoteliers trust and are satisfied with MyStay’s platform, while Civitfun’s limited and older review data undermines confidence. For proven user satisfaction, edge: MyStay.
Civitfun charges a flat $200 monthly fee with no implementation or trial costs, but detailed pricing for additional features or rooms isn’t publicly available. MyStay’s base price is $400 per month, with no extra fees, and no trial info provided. Both options lack tiered or usage-based pricing in the public domain, making exact comparisons difficult.
Given the higher rating and review volume, the value of MyStay’s offering seems justified despite its higher cost, especially considering user satisfaction and features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers quick setup and proven user satisfaction, or if you lack the resources to manage potentially complex integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly specialized automation or advanced branding features not supported by MyStay.
Civitfun excels in providing a feature-rich, customizable contactless check-in platform—ideal for hotels with complex operational needs or those seeking extensive branding options. However, its limited review data and slower support perception could be drawbacks for hoteliers seeking proven reliability.
MyStay stands out due to its high user ratings, extensive integrations, and large, recent review base, making it a dependable choice for properties that prioritize ease of use and operational efficiency. Its focus on seamless communication and automation helps hotels improve guest experience and staff productivity.
If your hotel values proven satisfaction and reliable support, MyStay is the clear choice. For properties needing advanced customization and branding flexibility, Civitfun could be suitable, but only if you’re prepared to navigate its limited feedback and potential implementation challenges.
According to HTR's product database, Civitfun and MyStay Check in share 4 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Custom Questions | ||
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| Hotel Website Check-in Portal | ||
| Marketing Communications Opt-in | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation | ||
| Terms & Conditions Signing |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Civitfun and MyStay Check in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Civitfun offers 21 verified integration partners, while MyStay Check in offers 30. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Civitfun: No. MyStay Check in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Civitfun has an HT Score of 0 and MyStay has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor