The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
ICG FrontHotel shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while ICG FrontHotel users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs a solution that streamlines operations, improves guest experiences, and integrates smoothly with your existing tools. Clock PMS by Clock offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a broad feature set, while ICG Fronthotel by ICG Software claims to be the most complete PMS, though it currently lacks user reviews or recent data. Given that Clock has over 250 recent reviews and a high satisfaction rate, it clearly leads in user confidence and proven performance. But which system truly fits your hotel’s specific needs?
Both Clock PMS and ICG Fronthotel aim to centralize hotel operations, but their market presence and user feedback differ dramatically. Clock PMS boasts over 250 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.8/5 overall rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong, recent user satisfaction. In contrast, ICG Fronthotel has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its current performance or customer experience.
Clock’s extensive feature set includes booking engine, channel management, revenue management, guest profiles, online check-in, and guest messaging, all within a single cloud-based platform. ICG Fronthotel claims to manage all hotel areas in an integrated, simplified way, emphasizing synchronized mobile tools, but lacks concrete features comparison or recent user feedback. Without recent reviews or a tangible track record, ICG’s effectiveness remains unverified.
Considering your hotel’s need for tested reliability and active user feedback, Clock PMS stands out as the more dependable choice. Are you willing to rely on unverified claims, or do you prefer a proven solution with recent validation?
If your hotel prioritizes proven usability, extensive features, and a large, satisfied customer base, go with Clock PMS. It is particularly suited for hotels seeking a full-featured, cloud-based system that handles reservations, front desk, invoicing, channel management, and guest engagement, all supported by recent reviews and a high NPS score.
If your hotel requires a highly integrated, mobile-friendly PMS with a focus on team productivity and simplified management, and you’re comfortable with the risk of limited recent data, ICG Fronthotel could be considered. However, the lack of recent user feedback and detailed features makes it less suitable for hoteliers expecting proven results.
In summary, for most hotels, Clock PMS offers the confidence, proven performance, and detailed feature set needed to support daily operations and growth. ICG Fronthotel’s claims may appeal, but without current reviews, it remains an untested option.
Clock PMS’s UI has received an average ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal training time. Users mention that new staff can be trained quickly, and the system helps streamline daily tasks, ultimately saving time and reducing errors.
ICG Fronthotel, on the other hand, has no publicly available user ratings or recent reviews to assess its usability. Its claim to “manage all hotel areas in an integrated, simplified way” sounds promising, but without direct user feedback, its ease of use cannot be verified.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 37 core features with 21 exclusive ones, including a booking engine, channel manager, revenue management, guest profiles, online check-in, guest messaging, and more. Its features are well-documented, regularly updated, and supported by a large partner network of 111 verified integrations, such as SiteMinder and RateGain.
ICG Fronthotel’s features remain unspecified beyond claims of managing all hotel areas in an integrated way. It does not list specific functionalities or unique tools, and no detailed feature count is available. Its limited number of verified integrations (12) compared to Clock’s suggests fewer connectivity options.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS maintains a customer support rating of 4.75/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users highlight that the support team quickly addresses issues and provides ongoing assistance, significantly easing onboarding and daily use.
ICG Fronthotel lacks recent reviews, support ratings, or detailed feedback, making it impossible to compare support quality directly. Given the overwhelming positive feedback for Clock’s support, ICG’s support experience cannot be confidently assessed.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts a verified partner network with 111 integrations, including major industry players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and hotel-specific tools. Its open API and no connection fees give your hotel flexibility to connect with various systems and enhance functionality.
ICG Fronthotel offers only 12 verified integrations, with some shared partners like RoomCloud and Vingcard. The smaller network limits connectivity options and customization potential, which could restrict your hotel’s future integration needs.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews consistently rate it highly, with a 4.8/5 overall score, a 9.47/10 NPS, and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of all sizes, especially boutique and city center properties, praise its ease of use, feature richness, and customer support.
ICG Fronthotel has no recent ratings or reviews, so no current hotel sentiment exists. Its lack of feedback prevents any reliable assessment of user satisfaction or property segment-specific ratings.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or hidden costs. Its transparent pricing model makes budgeting straightforward and predictable.
ICG FrontHotel’s pricing is not publicly disclosed; it states “N/A,” implying a custom quote or undisclosed fee structure. The absence of clear pricing complicates budget planning and comparison.
In short, Clock offers transparent, fixed pricing, while ICG’s costs are uncertain.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a minimal feature set, or if you are comfortable with a less proven, unreviewed system.
Not ideal if you need a system with verified recent user feedback, proven reliability, or extensive integrations.
Clock PMS is a robust, well-reviewed platform, with recent feedback confirming its ease of use, feature depth, and customer support. Its large partner network and transparent pricing make it a flexible, reliable choice for most hotels.
ICG Fronthotel, while claiming to be highly complete and integrated, lacks recent verification through reviews or detailed feature disclosure. Without current user feedback, it’s difficult to recommend over an established, proven platform like Clock PMS.
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich PMS supported by recent reviews, go with Clock PMS. If you’re open to untested options and have specific mobile or simplified management needs, ICG Fronthotel may warrant further investigation—but proceed cautiously.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and ICG Fronthotel share 37 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and ICG Fronthotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while ICG Fronthotel offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. ICG Fronthotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and ICG FrontHotel has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor