ICG Fronthotel vs. RMS:
Which Is Right for You?

The Decision

You've narrowed your options to ICG Fronthotel and RMS, two property management systems (PMS) designed to streamline hotel operations. Both aim to improve efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. RMS currently dominates in reviews and recent feedback, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Are you ready to choose the PMS that best suits your property?

Is ICG Fronthotel or RMS Better for Hotels?

ICG Fronthotel is marketed as a complete, integrated PMS that manages all hotel areas with a focus on simplicity and productivity. RMS, on the other hand, offers a broad array of features tailored for scalability, revenue management, and guest engagement, supported by a large user base and extensive integrations. RMS’s recent reviews are more numerous and current, providing a clearer picture of actual hotel experiences. Given this, RMS appears to be the more tested and trusted product today.

While ICG Fronthotel claims to be “the most experienced PMS,” its zero ratings and lack of recent reviews leave its real-world performance unverified. RMS benefits from over 290 reviews, with a 4.56/5 overall rating, reflecting consistent positive feedback. Do these differences suggest RMS’s robustness and reliability better meet your hotel’s needs?

RMS vs ICG Fronthotel: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS supporting multi-channel bookings, revenue management, guest CRM, and integrations, RMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—38 exclusive features—caters to hotels looking to optimize revenue, guest relationships, and operations across multiple properties. RMS is especially suited for mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and properties with complex operations, thanks to its broad capabilities and proven scalability.

Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a simplified, integrated management solution with mobile tools and basic reservation management, ICG FrontHotel might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or verified user feedback, its ability to deliver consistent performance remains uncertain. For most hoteliers seeking reliability and growth potential, RMS is the safer and more proven option.

Is ICG Fronthotel or RMS Easier to Use?

RMS boasts a user rating of 4.28/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding. Users highlight that RMS is “very user-friendly,” with a smooth setup process and responsive support, making staff adoption easier. RMS’s mobile app and guest portal further streamline daily tasks, reducing training time and minimizing errors.

In contrast, ICG Fronthotel has a zero score across all categories, indicating no recent or verified user reviews. Without clear data, it’s impossible to gauge its ease of use. Given RMS’s high ratings and positive feedback, it clearly offers a more accessible experience. Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Features: ICG Fronthotel or RMS?

RMS surpasses ICG FrontHotel in features, offering 38 unique capabilities including a booking engine, EPoS, revenue management, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, and multi-lingual support. These tools are tailored for properties seeking to maximize revenue streams and improve guest engagement. RMS’s features are well-integrated, delivering a comprehensive platform that scales with your hotel.

ICG FrontHotel’s unique feature is limited to a drag-and-drop tapechart, a useful but narrow functionality. It lacks the broader automation, revenue, and guest management tools available in RMS. For hotels that want a full-featured system that covers all operational bases, RMS’s extensive capabilities give it the edge.

Which Has Better Customer Support: ICG Fronthotel or RMS?

RMS’s support is rated at 4.48/5, with reviews emphasizing its helpful, knowledgeable team and quick responses. Customers express confidence in its proactive service, which reduces downtime and simplifies troubleshooting. RMS’s support team is praised for its responsiveness, with comments like “support staff are very helpful and always quick to assist.”

ICG Fronthotel, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. This lack of verified feedback significantly hampers trust, especially when choosing a critical operational system. RMS’s well-documented support performance makes it the safer choice. Edge: RMS.

Which Has More Integrations: ICG Fronthotel or RMS?

RMS offers over 112 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, RateGain, Criton, Sage, and Unifocus. This extensive list allows your hotel to connect easily with booking channels, POS systems, and revenue tools, facilitating smoother operations and better data flow.

ICG Fronthotel, with only 12 verified partners, has a more limited integration ecosystem. While some key partners are shared, RMS’s broader network supports more comprehensive automation and connectivity. For hotels needing extensive integrations, RMS provides a clear advantage. Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: ICG Fronthotel or RMS?

RMS’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.56/5 overall, 20 reviews in the last 6 months) demonstrate strong user satisfaction. Hotels from various segments, including resorts, boutique hotels, and motels, rate RMS highly, citing features, support, and ease of use. The most recent feedback highlights its scalability and reliability.

ICG FrontHotel has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or real-world performance. In today’s review-driven environment, RMS’s active user feedback clearly makes it the preferred choice. Edge: RMS.

How Much Do ICG Fronthotel and RMS Cost?

ICG Fronthotel does not publish pricing details, and its absence of recent reviews suggests limited market traction or uncertain cost structures. RMS charges approximately $800 per month, with no trial or freemium options. This predictable pricing reflects the system’s comprehensive feature set and support.

While RMS’s cost may seem significant for smaller properties, its extensive capabilities justify the investment for hotels aiming to scale or optimize revenue. Without transparent pricing, ICG Fronthotel’s value proposition remains unclear.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ICG Fronthotel?

• Hotels that prefer an all-in-one, straightforward management system with basic reservation features.
• Small properties seeking a simplified PMS without extensive integrations or advanced revenue tools.
• Teams prioritizing mobile tools and streamlined operations in a single platform.
• Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, multiple integrations, or scalability.

Given the lack of recent verified reviews, ICG FrontHotel is best suited for properties with minimal operational complexity and no immediate need for sophisticated revenue features or integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

• Hotels aiming to maximize revenue through dynamic pricing, ancillary sales, and targeted marketing.
• Multi-property groups seeking scalable, centralized management.
• Properties that need extensive integrations with OTAs, POS, revenue management, and guest engagement tools.
• Hotels that value detailed reporting, guest profiles, and real-time insights to improve service.
• Not ideal if your property is very small or only needs a basic PMS, or if you prefer a system with limited features.

RMS’s versatility makes it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, especially those looking to grow and diversify operations.

RMS vs ICG Fronthotel: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS offers a comprehensive, scalable platform backed by hundreds of recent reviews and high ratings. Its advanced features, extensive integrations, and proven support make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.

ICG Fronthotel’s limited recent feedback and narrow feature set suggest it’s less proven in today’s hotel landscape. For most properties looking for a dependable, feature-rich PMS, RMS is the better option.

Choose RMS if you need a proven, versatile system capable of supporting your growth. Alternatively, consider ICG FrontHotel only if your needs are minimal and your property’s size and complexity are limited.

In conclusion, RMS’s extensive feature set, market presence, and strong user feedback give it the edge for hotels prioritizing scalability, revenue management, and guest experience. RMS’s large number of recent reviews and high ratings make it the safer, more reliable investment in today’s competitive hospitality environment.