The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Maxial shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Maxial users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Maxial |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs—whether it's seamless integration, extensive features, or user-friendliness. Cloudbeds PMS stands out with its broad feature set, high user ratings, and recent reviews, while Maxial offers a comprehensive management approach but with no recent reviews or widespread recognition. What factors should weigh most heavily in your decision?
Cloudbeds and Maxial aim to solve core hotel management challenges: streamlining operations, improving guest experience, and boosting revenue. Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one platform with over 64 unique features, including channel management, revenue tools, and integrations, targeted at a broad hotel audience. Maxial, on the other hand, claims to streamline operations with modules like reservations and billing but lacks detailed feature information and recent user feedback.
Cloudbeds has a strong reputation backed by over 1,071 reviews and recent data from the last six months, indicating active user engagement. Maxial, meanwhile, has no recent reviews or user ratings available, making its real-world performance uncertain. Are you comfortable choosing a system without recent user feedback, or do you prefer a proven solution?
If your hotel needs an extensively integrated, easy-to-use platform with proven scalability—especially if prioritizing strong support, numerous features, and extensive partner networks—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its high ratings (4.63/5 overall, 4.61/5 ease of use) and positive recent reviews show it’s trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide.
If your hotel is small, with simple operational needs, and you’re willing to accept a less transparent platform without recent reviews or detailed feature disclosures, Maxial might be considered. However, the lack of recent validation suggests Cloudbeds’ more reliable performance for real-world hotel management.
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.61/5 ease of use rating based on over 1,000 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, simple reservation workflows, and mobile accessibility. Multiple reviews highlight that staff find it straightforward to learn, reducing training time and administrative burdens.
Maxial’s ease of use isn’t supported by recent reviews or ratings, and no user feedback is available to evaluate its interface or onboarding process. Given Cloudbeds’ significantly higher rating and recent positive reviews, it clearly offers a more proven, user-friendly experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds offers a robust feature suite, including a channel manager, revenue management, online check-in, guest CRM, automated reminders, digital registration, and a mobile app—totaling over 64 distinct functionalities. Its integration with over 190 verified partners enhances operational flexibility and scalability.
Maxial’s feature set appears limited to core modules like reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing, with no public data on additional tools or integrations. The absence of detailed features or recent updates favors Cloudbeds as the more feature-rich solution.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds consistently receives support ratings of 4.41/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsive, attentive, and knowledgeable support team. Customers frequently mention quick issue resolution and helpful onboarding, which reduces downtime and frustration.
Maxial has no recent testimonials or ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. Without recent customer feedback, Cloudbeds’ proven support infrastructure is the safer choice for operational peace of mind.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds boasts over 190 verified integration partners, covering channel managers, booking engines, payment systems, property access, and third-party apps. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize and expand their tech stack with ease.
Maxial provides no publicly available data on integrations or partnerships, limiting its appeal for hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform. Cloudbeds’ proven, extensive integration network clearly outperforms Maxial.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews and a 4.63/5 overall score reflect high satisfaction across a variety of property types, from boutique hotels to hostels and resorts. Hoteliers consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Maxial lacks recent reviews and a rating, preventing any meaningful comparison. Based on available data, Cloudbeds’ high hotel ratings and recent feedback establish it as the favored choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $600/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-level feature set and support. No pricing information is publicly available for Maxial, indicating it might not have a transparent or standard pricing model.
Given Cloudbeds’ clear pricing structure and value for money ratings (4.3/5), it offers predictable costs. The lack of transparent pricing for Maxial makes it difficult to assess its affordability or value.
Not ideal if: You prefer a minimal, simple reservation system without the need for advanced features or integrations.
Not ideal if: You require extensive features, proven support, or recent user validation.
Cloudbeds stands out as the most reliable and feature-rich PMS, with a proven track record backed by over 1,000 recent reviews and active engagement across multiple regions. It excels in ease of use, integrations, support, and scalability, making it suitable for a broad range of property types from boutique hotels to hostels and resorts.
Maxial remains an untested option, with no recent reviews or detailed features available, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking stability and proven performance. If your hotel values a trusted, comprehensive platform, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.
When to choose Cloudbeds: If you want a well-supported, highly integrated PMS with extensive features proven by recent reviews and a large user base. Its scalability and support infrastructure make it ideal for growing properties.
When to consider Maxial: Only if you have very simple needs, operate a small property, and are comfortable with a less validated, less documented platform. Given the lack of recent validation, it’s not recommended for most hotels aiming for reliable management.
Our Verdict: Cloudbeds is the superior choice for most hotels, offering extensive features, proven support, and recent positive reviews. Maxial’s lack of recent validation and limited available information make it unsuitable for hotels seeking confidence and growth.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Maxial share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Maxial share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Maxial offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Maxial: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Maxial has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor