The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,423 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in Ease of Use and Value for Money — especially for casino properties (4.8/5), with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Seekom stands out with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,423 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1,414 | 9 |
After analyzing 1,423 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and onboarding, calendar and visual reservation management, reporting and analytics, while Seekom users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
Calendar and visual reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel management and OTA synchronization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support responsiveness and human access
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile app limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Billing, folio, and invoicing workflows
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 694 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 222 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 48 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #15 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 562 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 242 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 126 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 100 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 468 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 175 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 340 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 12 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Seekom/iBex means deciding how you want to manage your property operations. Both platforms serve as property management systems (PMS) with integrated channel managers, booking engines, and payment processing to help streamline reservations and guest experience. However, Cloudbeds offers a more unified platform with over 64 exclusive features and a broad global footprint, while Seekom provides a lighter, more focused PMS with 33 unique features mainly targeting motels and smaller properties.
Cloudbeds stands out for its comprehensive automation, real-time integrations, and scalability across diverse hotel segments. Seekom, on the other hand, has a strong presence in niche markets like motels but lacks the recent review activity and ecosystem breadth of Cloudbeds. Which system will better support your hotel’s growth and operational needs?
If your hotel requires a scalable, all-in-one system with a rich ecosystem of integrations and features, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It suits independent hotels, hostels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups that need a unified PMS, channel manager, and booking engine combined with dynamic pricing and guest communication tools.
Seekom is more appropriate if you run a motel or budget property focused in Europe or Oceania, where its smaller footprint and simplified functionality align with your operational scale. However, Seekom’s limited review presence and narrower integration network suggest it’s best for hotels seeking a straightforward PMS without the complexity or ambition of Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds leads significantly in ease of use with a 4.63/5 rating compared to Seekom’s 3.69/5. Hoteliers report that Cloudbeds offers an intuitive interface, fast onboarding (4.5/5), and workflows that reduce daily friction at the front desk and housekeeping. One reviewer praised Cloudbeds for being "easy to use, great back-end support, and transparent billing."
Seekom’s onboarding score (3.75/5) and customer comments indicate a steeper learning curve, with users wishing for more intuitive features like batch booking checks and improved promo code management. While Seekom’s support team is praised, the system itself is less user-friendly.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Cloudbeds offers twice as many unique features (64) as Seekom (33), covering advanced modules such as automated night audit, revenue management, integrated CRS, guest app, and spa & wellness. It also includes multi-channel self-mapping, digital registration, automated reminders, and extensive reporting tools not found in Seekom.
Seekom covers essential PMS functions with house-keeping, point of sale, and dynamic pricing but lacks advanced automation and scalability features. For example, Cloudbeds includes integrated payment terminals and ID scanning, enhancing operational efficiency, whereas Seekom’s features are more basic.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Cloudbeds and Seekom have similar customer support ratings: 4.43/5 for Cloudbeds and 4.38/5 for Seekom. Cloudbeds users frequently praise responsive, knowledgeable teams that helped during the pandemic and ongoing operations, though a few report slow access to human agents.
Seekom reviewers highlight a “switched on well-trained team” available 24/5, with “amazing chat support” and quick issue resolution. However, Cloudbeds’ larger user base means more extensive support resources and community insights, contributing to a more reliable customer experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Cloudbeds boasts a vast integration network with 208 verified partners, including popular tools like RateGain, RoomPriceGenie, and HiJiffy. This extensive ecosystem enables seamless connectivity across revenue management, guest communication, and channel distribution.
Seekom offers only 5 verified integrations, limiting your ability to connect specialized tools and services. Both platforms share a handful of partners, but Cloudbeds’ superior integration count and variety provide far greater operational flexibility and growth potential.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Seekom leads with an overall rating of 4.86/5 versus Cloudbeds’ 4.63/5, but this is based on only 8 reviews versus Cloudbeds’ 1,244. Cloudbeds’ reviews are more recent and diverse, covering various hotel types globally, while Seekom’s reviews are older and concentrated in motels.
Cloudbeds performs well across segments: boutique hotels (4.67/5), hostels (4.76/5), and extended stay (4.76/5). Seekom’s strongest ratings come from motels (4.83/5 over 7 reviews) and a handful of boutique or budget hotels. The volume and freshness of Cloudbeds’ reviews give you more confidence in its consistent performance.
Edge: Cloudbeds PMS.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600, while Seekom offers a slightly lower base price of $500. Neither platform uses freemium, flat monthly, or per-room pricing models, and both do not charge implementation fees or provide trials. Cloudbeds’ higher price reflects its broader features and global reach, whereas Seekom’s cost suits smaller or budget-focused properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds and Seekom both provide cloud-based property management systems integrating reservations, channel management, and booking engines. The core difference lies in Cloudbeds’ comprehensive feature set, extensive integrations, global presence, and recent, voluminous reviews versus Seekom’s smaller scale, limited features, and sparse user feedback.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a single, scalable system with advanced automation, a rich partner ecosystem, and strong support proven by over 1,200 recent reviews. It’s especially suited to independent hotels, hostels, boutique properties, and growing groups seeking operational and revenue growth.
Opt for Seekom if your property is a smaller motel or budget hotel in Europe or Oceania, where a simpler PMS is sufficient. While its user ratings are high, the lack of recent reviews and integrations suggest it’s best for teams with modest technology needs and a focus on straightforward operations.
Cloudbeds PMS clearly offers the stronger, more confident choice for hotels aiming to balance operational control, guest experience, and commercial growth.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
A common theme is that Cloudbeds is relatively easy to learn, visually clear, and suitable for small properties or teams with limited technical skills... A common theme is that Cloudbeds is relatively easy to learn, visually clear, and suitable for small properties or teams with limited technical skills. Some reviewers praise the onboarding and training materials, while others say setup can be slow or incomplete, especially during initial implementation.
Users most often praise Cloudbeds for its clear calendar view, which makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, split stays, and handle check-in... Users most often praise Cloudbeds for its clear calendar view, which makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, split stays, and handle check-ins and changes visually. Reviewers say this reduces clicks, speeds up front-desk work, and helps staff understand the property at a glance.
Users frequently mention Cloudbeds’ reporting as useful for reviewing performance, occupancy, revenue, and operational trends in one place. At the sam... Users frequently mention Cloudbeds’ reporting as useful for reviewing performance, occupancy, revenue, and operational trends in one place. At the same time, many want more customization, faster downloads, and more modern dashboard-style visualizations instead of Excel-like exports.
Where hoteliers push back
Support is a major differentiator in the reviews, but many users want faster access to a human and fewer chatbot bottlenecks. Some praise quick, helpf... Support is a major differentiator in the reviews, but many users want faster access to a human and fewer chatbot bottlenecks. Some praise quick, helpful chat or implementation help, while others ask for phone, video, or direct-agent support for urgent front-desk issues.
A major recurring issue is that the mobile app is often viewed as read-only or too limited for real operational work. Reviewers repeatedly want the ab... A major recurring issue is that the mobile app is often viewed as read-only or too limited for real operational work. Reviewers repeatedly want the ability to create and edit reservations, manage rooms, and receive real-time notifications directly in the app instead of switching back to the web browser or email.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Seekom/iBex share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 208 verified integration partners, while Seekom/iBex offers 5. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Seekom/iBex: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Seekom has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property