The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 131 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CMI shines .
Sertifi by Flywire shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Tokenization and 3-D Secure Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 131 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 131 |
After analyzing 131 verified reviews, CMI users most value its , while Sertifi by Flywire users highlight ease of use, payment processing efficiency, security measures. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CMI |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Security Measures
▾
|
|
|
+
Document Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration with Other Systems
▾
|
|
|
−
User Role Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Customizability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CMI |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #5 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 36 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 63 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #1 29 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CMI |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #1 61 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #1 86 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CMI |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #1 121 reviews |
| Europe | — | #4 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #1 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #1 5 reviews |
Choosing between CMI by CMI and Sertifi by Flywire hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing and eSignature capabilities. Both products aim to streamline transactions and reduce administrative burdens, but they diverge sharply in reviews, feature sets, and global presence. With Sertifi boasting more recent reviews and a significantly higher user rating, it offers a clearer path to reliable performance. Are you prioritizing ease of use, advanced features, or global reach?
Sertifi by Flywire leads in user satisfaction, recent reviews, and overall performance, making it the stronger choice for most hotels. CMI by CMI has no recent reviews or ratings and appears to lack the features and support that hoteliers need today. If your hotel values proven solutions with active user feedback, Sertifi is the clear pick.
Both CMI and Sertifi promise to ease payment and agreement workflows, but Sertifi is far more established in recent times, with 129 reviews and a 94.1 overall satisfaction score. CMI has no recent reviews or ratings, which clouds its effectiveness and support quality. Sertifi’s platform is designed explicitly for hospitality, emphasizing quick, secure payments and contract management, whereas CMI lacks recent validation.
Where they differ most is in user experience and feature set. Sertifi has a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating, thanks to a modern, intuitive interface and detailed onboarding, while CMI’s usability is unverified. Do you want a proven, current solution that hotel staff can adopt rapidly?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, reliable payments platform with active user feedback, go with Sertifi. Its 129 recent reviews, high NPS score, and comprehensive features—like PCI compliance, multi-currency settlements, and refund management—support this.
On the other hand, CMI is not recommended if you require a product with verified recent performance, wide integrations, or customer support. Its lack of recent reviews and ratings indicates it may not be actively supported or evolving, which can pose risks for your team’s operational continuity.
Sertifi’s UI is rated 4.78/5, with users describing it as “extremely easy to use,” “simple,” and “quick to learn,” with onboarding rated at 4.57/5. Customers mention that staff adoption is straightforward, and clients find the payment process smooth and secure.
In contrast, CMI has no recent ratings or reviews, making its usability impossible to verify. The absence of feedback suggests that CMI’s interface might be outdated or untested in current hotel environments.
Edge: Sertifi.
Sertifi offers 20 unique features, including payment tokenization, 3-D secure payments, multi-currency settlements, and refund management—capabilities that CMI lacks entirely. Its features are designed to cover end-to-end payment processing and agreement signing, streamlining workflows.
CMI provides no verified features, and its offering appears minimal or unverified. Given Sertifi’s extensive feature suite, it’s clear that Sertifi is better equipped to meet complex hotel payment needs.
Edge: Sertifi.
Sertifi’s support ratings are strong at 4.59/5, with users praising its quick resolution times and helpful team. Reviewers report that Sertifi’s customer service enhances confidence, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting.
CMI’s support quality is unknown due to the lack of recent reviews, making it impossible to assess whether your team would receive timely, effective help. Given Sertifi’s high support ratings, it’s the safer choice for hotels seeking reliable assistance.
Edge: Sertifi.
Sertifi has 7 verified integrations, including major hospitality and payment platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Stripe, and Infor. These integrations facilitate smoother workflows, reducing manual data entry and errors.
CMI has no verified integrations, limiting its compatibility with existing hotel systems. If connecting with other software is critical, Sertifi’s network of integrations offers a significant advantage.
Edge: Sertifi.
Sertifi’s recent reviews and high ratings (94.1 NPS, 4.78/5 ease of use, 4.59/5 support) reflect widespread satisfaction among diverse hotel segments, including luxury and branded hotels. Hoteliers emphasize its security, speed, and user-friendly interface.
CMI has no recent reviews or ratings, so its hotel segment performance remains unverified. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to determine whether CMI meets hotel expectations.
Edge: Sertifi.
CMI does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, suggesting a possibly bespoke or unavailable model. Sertifi charges a $100 monthly base fee, with no free tier or trial, but many users find value in its features and support, justifying the investment.
Since CMI’s pricing is unclear, and Sertifi’s transparent fee is reasonable for its capabilities, Sertifi provides clearer budget expectations.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Sertifi stands out as the clear leader with current, positive reviews and a rich feature set tailored for hospitality. Its high ratings across ease of use, support, and integrations make it the go-to for hotels seeking reliability and efficiency.
CMI’s lack of recent validation and zero reviews make it an uncertain choice, especially in today’s fast-paced hotel environment. If you want a solution backed by active users and proven results, Sertifi is the definitive recommendation.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision, ensuring you select the software that best matches your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions.
Payments Processing Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| CMI |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, CMI and Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CMI |
|
|---|---|---|
| 3-D Secure Payments | ||
| Accepts American Express | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Tokenization | ||
| Pre-Authorizations |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sertifi is frequently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it simple for both hotel staff and clients to navigate. The reduction in tim... Sertifi is frequently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it simple for both hotel staff and clients to navigate. The reduction in time and effort required for training new users is appreciated, simplifying the onboarding process.
Sertifi's payment processing is praised for its speed and efficiency, allowing clients to make payments quickly and securely. The ability to set up pa... Sertifi's payment processing is praised for its speed and efficiency, allowing clients to make payments quickly and securely. The ability to set up payment schedules and send secured payment links is seen as a significant time-saver, allowing hotels to reduce administrative tasks and increase cash flow.
Users consistently commend Sertifi for its strong security features, which are crucial for handling sensitive payment data. The PCI compliance ensures... Users consistently commend Sertifi for its strong security features, which are crucial for handling sensitive payment data. The PCI compliance ensures that transactions are secure, making both customers and hotels feel confident in processing payments through the system.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users appreciate Sertifi's integration capabilities with systems like Salesforce and Opera, which streamline operations by reducing the need for... Many users appreciate Sertifi's integration capabilities with systems like Salesforce and Opera, which streamline operations by reducing the need for manual entries and checks.
There are critical mentions regarding the management of user roles, such as difficulties in revoking user access after leaving a company. Users sugges... There are critical mentions regarding the management of user roles, such as difficulties in revoking user access after leaving a company. Users suggest improvements for handling permissions and user deactivation.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CMI and Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. CMI offers 0 verified integration partners, while Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CMI: No. Sertifi by Flywire (Payments): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CMI has an HT Score of 0 and Sertifi by Flywire has 94. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor