The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations and guest experience. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) offers a comprehensive, enterprise-level solution with a broad feature set and a long industry history. Counter, by contrast, is a newer, streamlined platform designed explicitly for hostels and small accommodations, emphasizing ease of use and automation. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency and guest management, but they approach these goals differently. GuestCentrix provides a full suite tailored for multi-property and large-scale operations, while Counter focuses on simplicity, affordability, and quick onboarding. Are you seeking an all-in-one solution with extensive integrations or a lightweight, user-friendly platform?
GuestCentrix is built for hotels and resorts that need a versatile and scalable PMS, capable of handling complex operations across multiple locations. Its feature set includes trust accounting, POS, inventory control, conference management, and central reporting, making it suitable for larger properties or multi-property groups.
Counter, on the other hand, is designed specifically for hostels and small accommodations, offering essential features like check-in/out, reservation management, and integrated POS in a mobile-friendly interface. Its core strength lies in its ease of use and affordability, but it lacks the advanced features of GuestCentrix, such as loyalty programs or revenue management.
The decision hinges on your property’s size and complexity: do you need an enterprise system or a straightforward hostel solution? Both products have their niche, but the more recent reviews and broader feature set favor Counter for smaller properties and hostels. Which system will serve your current needs and future growth best?
If your hotel operates multiple properties or requires detailed reporting, integrated accounting, and extensive third-party integrations, GuestCentrix is the logical choice. Its 12 verified partners and wide regional presence demonstrate its capacity to scale and support complex operations.
If your hotel is a hostel or small boutique with a focus on simplicity, fast onboarding, and automation, Counter is the better fit. Its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and automation features—such as contactless check-in and POS integration—make it ideal for small teams seeking efficiency.
In terms of customer support, Counter’s support team is frequently praised for responsiveness, with recent reviews highlighting their helpfulness and quick resolution. GuestCentrix's support quality is not explicitly rated, but its longer industry presence suggests a well-established support structure. For rapid deployment and ease of use, Counter edges ahead.
Counter’s user interface scores a 4.6 out of 5 and is praised for its simplicity, intuitiveness, and mobile accessibility. Many users mention that new staff can learn the system quickly, and daily operations like check-ins and reservations are straightforward.
GuestCentrix, with a 0/5 ease-of-use rating, does not have recent or detailed reviews to support its usability, but its size and feature complexity suggest a steeper learning curve. Its enterprise focus means it likely requires more extensive training and onboarding, which may slow adoption for smaller teams.
Given the recent, positive user feedback on Counter’s interface and onboarding, it clearly offers a better user experience. Edge: Counter.
GuestCentrix boasts an extensive suite of features, including trust accounting, POS, inventory management, conference booking, central reporting, and support for multiple property types. It integrates with 12 verified partners, such as Sage and Infor, enabling broad operational flexibility.
Counter has 19 unique features focused on core hostel operations: channel management, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency/multilingual support, and mobile app. It excels in automation, POS integration, and ease of use but lacks advanced revenue management and group booking features seen in GuestCentrix.
For properties seeking a wide array of features and integrations, GuestCentrix is more comprehensive. For streamlined, automated hostel management, Counter’s feature set is sufficient. Edge: Counter, due to its specialized automation and simplicity.
Counter consistently receives high marks for support, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews praising responsiveness, professionalism, and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max are frequently commended for their quick and effective assistance.
GuestCentrix’s support ratings are not available, but its long industry presence suggests a mature support infrastructure. However, the lack of recent review data makes it harder to assess current support quality.
Given the recent, detailed praise for Counter’s customer service, it edges out GuestCentrix. Edge: Counter.
GuestCentrix integrates with 12 verified partners, including key players like SiteMinder, Sage, and Shift4 Payments, offering broad connectivity for complex systems. Its integrations support trust accounting, analytics, and enterprise functions.
Counter currently supports 7 verified partners, including Stripe for payments, Goki for access, and Cloudbeds. Its integrations focus on core hostel needs like POS, channel management, and online booking, but it offers fewer options overall.
For extensive, enterprise-level integrations, GuestCentrix leads. For essential, targeted integrations suitable for small properties, Counter is sufficient. Edge: GuestCentrix.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 is based on 54 recent reviews, with many praising its ease of use, automation, and support—especially among hostel operators. Hosts describe it as the "best PMS for hostels," emphasizing simplicity and responsiveness.
GuestCentrix has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction. Its long industry history suggests reliability, but without recent feedback, it’s less clear.
Given Counter’s high rating and ongoing positive feedback, it’s the preferred choice here. Edge: Counter.
GuestCentrix does not publicly list pricing, but as an enterprise solution, it likely involves bespoke quotes, implementation fees, and ongoing costs suited for larger operations.
Counter is free to use, with no upfront costs or subscription fees, making it highly accessible for small hostels and boutique hotels. Additional costs may come from optional integrations or premium support.
For budget-conscious properties or small hostels, Counter’s free model is attractive. Larger hotels may find the investment in GuestCentrix justified by its extensive features.
GuestCentrix suits hotels with complex operational requirements, multi-property portfolios, and the capacity for enterprise-level software management.
Counter is suited for small-scale, fast-growing hostels or boutique hotels that prioritize ease of use and automation over extensive features.
GuestCentrix offers a broad, feature-rich PMS designed for larger, multi-property hotels and resorts. Its extensive integrations and enterprise capabilities make it ideal for complex operations aiming for scalability.
Counter shines in simplicity, automation, and support, making it the top choice for hostels and small hotels seeking a quick, affordable, and reliable management tool. Its high user ratings and recent reviews reinforce its strong position for smaller properties.
If your hotel needs an enterprise solution with diverse features and regional support, GuestCentrix will serve you well. For small properties prioritizing ease and automation, Counter is the smarter, more cost-effective pick.
In conclusion, your choice depends on your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans. Both products are capable, but Counter’s recent reviews and higher user ratings make it the stronger option for most small to medium-sized hostels and boutique hotels today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) offers 12 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix): No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor