The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Comanche International shines .
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 100 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, Comanche International users most value its , while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #29 11 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs to balance features, ease of use, support, and pricing. Both Comanche PMS and roommaster PMS aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in maturity, user feedback, and feature depth. Comanche, despite its long history, currently lacks recent reviews and a clear rating, making it difficult to gauge its current performance. Conversely, roommaster boasts a strong recent review profile, a high user rating, and a broad feature set. So, which product truly meets your needs?
Comanche PMS, established in 2003 and based in Thailand, positions itself as a total solutions provider for a range of hospitality businesses since 1996. However, it has zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, which raises questions about its current usability and support. On the other hand, roommaster, founded in 1994 and based in Florida, has over 80 reviews in the past six months alone, with an overall rating of 4.33/5 and a recent NPS score of 8.67/5, indicating strong, recent customer satisfaction.
The lack of reviews for Comanche makes it challenging to assess its effectiveness and customer experience. Meanwhile, roommaster’s recent feedback emphasizes its user-friendly interface, robust support, and comprehensive features. Given the recent review activity and high scores, roommaster’s reputation appears more reliable. Are you willing to rely on a product with no recent reviews, or do you prefer a solution with proven recent performance?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich PMS that supports operational efficiency through automated reports, cloud access, and integrated channel management, roommaster is the clear choice. Its extensive set of over 60 unique features—including revenue management, booking engine, guest profiles, and real-time reporting—caters to mid-sized and larger hotels looking to streamline their operations.
Conversely, if your hotel is a small property or boutique operation seeking a simple or niche solution and is willing to accept the risk of limited recent data, Comanche might be considered. Yet, given the absence of current reviews and ratings, roommaster’s strong recent customer feedback makes it the safer, more dependable choice for most hoteliers. Which features are critical for your hotel’s daily operations and long-term growth?
Roommaster’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.22/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and straightforward back-office functions. Customers highlight the platform’s cloud accessibility, enabling staff to operate from anywhere, and mention that it simplifies tasks like reservations and reporting. Some users do note room for UI improvements, especially around report generation and language options.
In contrast, Comanche has a 0/5 ease of use rating backed by no recent reviews, leaving its user-friendliness unverified in the current market. The absence of recent feedback prevents a meaningful comparison, but the lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be as optimized or supported as roommaster.
Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster outshines Comanche with 60 unique features, including channel management, revenue modules, online support, guest communication, digital registration, automated reminders, and extensive reporting tools. Its integrated modules cover all core hotel operations and add advanced capabilities like guest CRM, gift vouchers, and multi-currency support.
Comanche, however, offers no exclusive features and appears to lack the breadth of functionalities found in roommaster. Its limited features mean it might not meet the needs of hotels seeking comprehensive operational control. If feature depth is vital, roommaster’s extensive module set provides a clear advantage.
Edge: roommaster.
Support ratings strongly favor roommaster, with a 4.25/5 customer support score based on recent reviews. Hoteliers describe its support as “quick,” “responsive,” and “easy to work with,” although some mention occasional inconsistencies. Support feedback emphasizes prompt resolution and helpful staff in recent interactions.
Comanche’s support is unverified due to no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess its responsiveness or quality. The lack of customer feedback suggests that roommaster’s established support reputation is more reliable for your hotel’s ongoing needs.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster integrates with 56 verified partners, including major channel managers, booking engines, and revenue tools like SiteMinder, STAAH, and IDeaS. Its extensive integration ecosystem enables seamless data flow across critical systems, reducing manual entry and errors. It also supports over 10 shared partners with Comanche, including LodgIQ and Cendyn.
Comanche, with only 12 verified partners, offers fewer native integrations, possibly limiting connectivity options for more complex operations. If your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems, roommaster’s broader integration network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster’s recent reviews indicate a 4.33/5 overall rating from 83 reviewers, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, notably boutique, city-center, and resort properties, praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Comanche has no reviews, so there are no recent ratings or recommendations to consider. The absence of recent feedback makes it risky to rely on Comanche’s performance or reputation. Customer ratings are a strong indicator of real-world satisfaction.
Edge: roommaster.
Comanche offers no publicly disclosed pricing or trial options, making it difficult to evaluate its affordability or value. Its unclear pricing structure might involve custom quotes or hidden fees, increasing uncertainty for your budget.
roommaster’s pricing begins at $500 per month, with no implementation or trial fees disclosed. While it’s a straightforward subscription model, the cost could be a consideration for small hotels with limited budgets, but it provides transparency.
If predictable pricing is important, roommaster’s clear cost structure is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust, modern features, extensive integrations, or recent support. Larger properties or those seeking comprehensive operational control should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or local, with limited tech budgets or minimal operational complexity. Small boutique hotels might not need the extensive features.
The core difference lies in maturity and feature depth: roommaster provides a well-established, feature-rich platform supported by recent reviews and high customer satisfaction. If your hotel needs a reliable, modern, and integrated PMS, roommaster’s broad capabilities and positive recent feedback make it the clear choice.
Choose Comanche only if your hotel operates on a very limited scale, prioritizes vendor longevity over current performance, or is prepared to accept the risks of limited recent data. Its lack of recent reviews makes it a less dependable option for most hoteliers seeking proven performance.
For most hotels, roommaster offers a safer, more comprehensive, and better-supported solution that aligns with modern hospitality demands.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Comanche PMS and roommaster PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 48 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Comanche PMS and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Comanche PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster PMS leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Comanche PMS: No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Comanche International has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor