The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 87 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
apaleo GmbH shines in Ease of Use — especially for airport and conference properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Counter shines in user interface and usability — especially for hostel properties (4.7/5), with exclusive features like Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 87 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 57 |
After analyzing 87 verified reviews, apaleo GmbH users most value its frequent updates and community engagement, customization and flexibility, open api and integration, while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Frequent Updates and Community Engagement
▾
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
−
Group and Booking Management
▾
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 7 reviews | #27 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #26 19 reviews | #48 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #43 1 reviews | #34 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 3 reviews | #28 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | #33 16 reviews |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | #45 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #42 4 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #20 9 reviews | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #37 2 reviews | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #18 26 reviews | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #17 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Apaleo Open PMS and Counter serve distinctly different hotel types: Apaleo targets hotel and serviced apartment groups seeking a flexible, API-first platform with extensive integration options, while Counter caters primarily to hostels needing a straightforward, mobile-friendly PMS. Apaleo’s strength lies in customization, multi-property management, and open architecture, enabling complex workflows and scalable operations. Counter excels in simplicity, ease of use, and basic automation tailored to hostel operations.
Both platforms address property management challenges such as reservations, billing, guest communication, and operational efficiency, but Apaleo solves these problems at scale with a modular ecosystem, whereas Counter focuses on reducing manual work for smaller, primarily hostel properties with a clean interface and integrated POS capabilities.
If your property is a multi-location hotel group or serviced apartment complex aiming to build a tailored tech stack with deep integrations, choose Apaleo. Its 122 verified partners and API-first design support complex operations and scalability, as reflected by a 4.8 overall rating across 30 reviews including high marks (4.9) from boutique hotels and city center hotels. Apaleo’s rapid deployment and stable performance make it ideal for tech-forward teams.
If you run a hostel or limited-service property, particularly one with under 100 beds, Counter fits better. It holds an 83% user base in hostels and a 4.7 rating on 50 hostel reviews, praised for its ease of use and automation suited for smaller teams. Counter simplifies manual tasks with automated check-in and POS integration, but its limited integrations (7 partners) and bug reports bias it towards smaller, less complex operations. Data for large hotels using Counter is insufficient to recommend it outside hostels.
Apaleo scores 4.9/5 for ease of use and onboarding compared to Counter’s 4.6/5 and 4.7/5, respectively, across 30 and 57 reviews. Reviewers of Apaleo highlight its intuitive interface that new staff learn within minutes and its straightforward setup achievable in two hours by users with IT knowledge. Counter’s users praise its clean, simple UI requiring no training, especially beneficial for hostel staff. However, Apaleo’s design balances complexity with usability, enabling lean workflows, while Counter favors basic functionality.
Both platforms report smooth onboarding, but Apaleo’s higher ratings suggest a more polished user experience for diverse hotel teams. Despite Counter’s praise for ease in hostels, Apaleo’s higher scores and review volume support it as easier to adopt across broader hotel types.
Edge: apaleo GmbH.
Apaleo offers 20 exclusive hotel-focused features versus Counter’s 2 unique features. Apaleo’s integrated CRS, automated space optimization, real-time status updates, and drag-n-drop tapechart improve front desk workflow and revenue management. Its built-in payment terminal with card reader and PCI, GDPR, SOC2 compliance ensure secure guest transactions, critical for mid-size to large hotels. Features like task management and housekeeping mobile app facilitate operational coordination.
Counter’s unique features are a booking engine and guest CRM, addressing reservation management and guest interaction, geared specifically to hostel needs. However, Counter lacks advanced revenue management tools and multi-property capabilities.
Both share 17 basic PMS functions, but Apaleo’s breadth and depth of hotel-centric features clearly support more complex operations and workflows.
Edge: apaleo GmbH.
Apaleo and Counter are rated evenly in customer support (4.8 vs 4.9) and onboarding (4.8 vs 4.7), with 30 and 57 reviews respectively. Apaleo reviewers call support “best” and “responsive” but desire extended phone support. Counter users specifically mention quick, helpful responses from named staff (Evelyn, Max, José), praising their professionalism and follow-up, though some note slower support in certain time zones.
Both companies maintain high support standards, with Counter’s smaller team noted for personalized assistance and Apaleo’s community-driven support network. This parity suggests comparable customer experience.
Edge: Even.
Apaleo leads with 122 verified partners versus Counter’s 7. Both integrate with FLYR Hospitality and SiteMinder, but Apaleo’s exclusive integrations include major revenue management tools like Right Revenue and Profitroom, housekeeping solutions like hotelkit, and financial platforms like Fairmas, enabling hotels to build comprehensive, best-of-breed stacks.
Counter integrates with POS and payment platforms like Stripe, Goki for access control, and channel managers such as WuBook and Cloudbeds, fitting its hostel focus. However, its limited partner ecosystem restricts scalability and advanced functionality for larger operations.
Hotels requiring extensive tech ecosystems and multi-vendor connectivity will find Apaleo’s integration breadth decisive.
Edge: apaleo GmbH.
Both products hold strong overall ratings: Apaleo 4.8/5 (30 reviews), Counter 4.6/5 (57 reviews). Apaleo’s ratings are notably higher in boutique hotels (4.9/5 across 16 reviews), city center hotels (4.9/5 across 12 reviews), and extended stay (4.8/5 across 9 reviews). Counter dominates hostel reviews with 4.7/5 from 50 reviewers and scores well in limited service hotels (4.6/5 from 35 reviews).
No recent reviews exist for either product in the last six months, so current ratings reflect slightly older experiences. Apaleo’s 97% likelihood to recommend surpasses Counter’s 91%, indicating stronger customer advocacy despite fewer reviews.
Edge: Even.
Apaleo publishes a base price of $900.00 with no free trial, monthly flat fee, or per-room charges. Pricing transparency and lack of implementation fees contribute to predictable budgeting.
Counter does not publish pricing details publicly, making direct cost comparison impossible. Reviewers note Counter as free or low-cost but also suggest tiered pricing based on bed count or region for affordability.
Hotels valuing upfront pricing clarity will prefer Apaleo’s disclosed model.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Apaleo Open PMS and Counter diverge fundamentally in target customer and capability. Apaleo is a flexible, API-first platform designed for hotel groups and serviced apartments pursuing a modular, scalable tech ecosystem. Counter is a niche PMS optimized for hostels prioritizing ease of use and integrated POS automation.
Choose Apaleo if your hotel needs extensive integrations (122 partners), advanced features like automated space optimization and real-time reporting, and the ability to tailor workflows through an open API. Its fast onboarding and high ratings among boutique and city center hotels support this. Conversely, select Counter if you operate a hostel or limited-service property wanting a simple, mobile-friendly system with built-in booking engine and guest CRM, plus seamless POS and payment integration, supported by responsive customer service.
The decision hinges on property complexity and scale. Apaleo fits hotels aiming for technological customization and growth; Counter suits hostels seeking straightforward, ready-to-use management.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing impro... The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing improvements. The active community provides a support network that enhances the user experience.
Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems t... Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems that align perfectly with their operational needs, enhancing efficiency and improving guest services.
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
Where hoteliers push back
While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current o... While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current options limited, leading to reliance on additional tools for deeper analytics.
Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehe... Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehensive functionality and intuitiveness.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Apaleo Open PMS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Apaleo Open PMS offers 122 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Apaleo Open PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Apaleo Open PMS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. apaleo GmbH has an HT Score of 79 and Counter has 14. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property