The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Acigrup shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Acigrup users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter and Acigrup’s Hospitality Software boils down to your property type, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Counter excels in the hostel segment with a proven track record, while Acigrup offers a broader suite of tools but lacks recent user feedback. Both aim to optimize how your hotel manages reservations and operations, but their core strengths differ markedly.
Counter is a dedicated PMS tailored for hostels, offering an all-in-one platform that simplifies daily management. Acigrup positions itself as a broader hospitality solution, but with no recent reviews or clear segmentation, it’s less proven for your specific needs. Are you seeking a specialized hostel system or a versatile platform that scales?
Counter, with a score of 16.52 and 54 reviews, is clearly the more reliable choice for your hostel or small hotel. Its recent reviews highlight high satisfaction, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong user confidence.
Acigrup, on the other hand, has zero reviews and a score of zero, making it impossible to gauge usability, support, or feature effectiveness. While both platforms lack transparent pricing and detailed feature comparisons, Counter’s active user base and recent feedback strongly favor it.
Would your property benefit most from a proven, hostelry-specific PMS? If yes, Counter is the clear choice.
If your hotel mainly operates as a hostel or small property needing an intuitive, easy-to-use PMS, go with Counter. Its feature set—including channel management, booking engine, and automated night audits—serves hostels well, and recent reviews praise its simplicity and support.
If your hotel requires a broad hospitality platform capable of integrating multiple operational facets beyond PMS, then Acigrup might seem appealing. However, given the lack of recent feedback, its actual performance and support quality remain unverified.
In summary, choose Counter for hostel-focused operations and proven reliability; consider Acigrup only if you prioritize a broader, unreviewed suite and are willing to test unproven software.
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5, backed by 54 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and simple onboarding. Hotel staff report that the platform is straightforward to learn, even for those with minimal tech experience, and the mobile app offers flexible management.
Acigrup has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. The lack of user feedback makes it uncertain whether its interface is as friendly or if onboarding is smooth.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 exclusive features, including channel management, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These capabilities are tailored specifically for hostels and small hotels, streamlining operational complexity.
Acigrup does not publicly disclose its feature set or offer comparable functionalities, leaving its capabilities unverified. Without concrete feature details or user feedback, Counter’s feature depth clearly sets it apart.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Guests describe support as responsive and professional, often resolving issues within minutes.
Acigrup’s support quality remains unknown due to no recent reviews or ratings, leaving hotel operators uncertain about response times or issue resolution.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major providers like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, facilitating seamless connectivity with booking channels, payment systems, and access controls. These integrations enhance operational fluidity for your property.
Acigrup has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity and likely requiring manual processes for many tasks. This restricts scalability and automation for your hotel.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.73/5 rating and 91% willing to recommend it, particularly among hostel operators. Users praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Acigrup lacks any recent reviews or ratings, rendering it impossible to determine user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences.
Edge: Counter.
Pricing for Counter is not publicly disclosed; however, it offers a freemium model with no implementation fees, suggesting affordability for small properties. Its value is reinforced by high satisfaction ratings and robust features.
Acigrup’s pricing details are unavailable, making it difficult to assess its affordability or value proposition.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, sophisticated POS integrations, or extensive reporting capabilities.
Not ideal if you need proven, user-friendly software with recent reviews or if you operate in regions where Acigrup has no market presence.
Counter is a dedicated, well-reviewed PMS built specifically for hostels and small hotels. Its high ratings, recent positive feedback, and feature set make it a solid choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and reliability.
Acigrup presents itself as a flexible, comprehensive platform but lacks recent user reviews or verified integrations. Its unproven status makes it risky unless your hotel seeks a broad, potentially more customizable solution and is willing to explore untested software.
If your priority is a trusted, highly-rated PMS with proven support and features, Counter is the clear winner. For properties needing a multi-function platform, with the caveat of less market validation, Acigrup could be considered, but with caution.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Hospitality Software share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Hospitality Software share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Hospitality Software offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Hospitality Software: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Acigrup has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor