The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 549 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CQR shines .
HOTELTIME shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 549 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 549 |
After analyzing 549 verified reviews, CQR users most value its , while HOTELTIME users highlight user interface and learning curve, technical support, reporting and analytics. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CQR |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Optimization
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 219 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 238 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 46 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 241 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #4 143 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #4 49 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #52 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #5 111 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #1 21 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. You’re evaluating CQR PMS by CQR and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME, both targeting diverse hospitality needs. While CQR has no recent reviews and zero ratings, HotelTime boasts over 430 reviews with a 4.83/5 overall score, making it the more proven choice. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and need for extensive integrations.
CQR PMS is a new entrant with no current reviews, making it hard to gauge real-world performance and user satisfaction. HotelTime, on the other hand, has a sizable, recent review base with strong feedback on usability, support, and features, reflecting its established presence in the industry. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but HotelTime’s proven track record and broad feature set give it the edge for hotels seeking a dependable, well-supported system.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, cloud-based platform with extensive third-party integrations, HotelTime is the clear winner. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those requiring automation, guest management, and scalable solutions, thanks to its 58 verified integrations and a global presence in over 32 countries.
If your hotel prefers a simple, possibly customizable system with a limited or unproven track record, CQR might appeal—though current data and user feedback are unavailable. For most hoteliers, HotelTime’s proven reliability and comprehensive capabilities make it the safer choice, especially given its large, recent review base.
HotelTime’s user interface receives a 4.66/5 ease-of-use rating and is praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and helpful support, with reviews highlighting how staff quickly adapt and operate the system efficiently. Conversely, CQR has no reviews or ratings available, so its usability remains unverified.
Based on available data, HotelTime clearly leads in user-friendliness and staff adoption. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime offers a rich suite of 51 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, online booking engine, channel management, automated night audit, and mobile check-in. CQR has no listed features or unique modules, leaving its capabilities unverified.
HotelTime’s extensive features directly address core hotel operations, revenue management, and guest experience. Its wide array of tools makes it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s reviews consistently praise its support team for responsiveness and expertise, with an average rating of 4.73/5. Users mention quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance, which contribute to smoother implementations and daily operations.
CQR has no review data or support ratings available, so its support quality cannot be assessed. Based on current information, HotelTime’s support is clearly superior. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including popular tools like Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and Umi Digital, facilitating a highly connected tech stack. CQR has no verified partners or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with external systems.
For hotels relying on third-party integrations to streamline operations, HotelTime provides a significant advantage. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s reviews, with over 430 recent comments, show an average rating of 4.83/5, with properties across segments—luxury, boutique, resorts—highlighting ease of use, support, and feature richness. CQR has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge customer satisfaction.
Given the extensive recent feedback, HotelTime’s user ratings underscore its reliability and value. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
CQR’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating possible custom quotes or a lack of transparent pricing. HotelTime charges $600/month for its platform, with no free tier or trial, positioning it as an investment in comprehensive functionality.
The transparent pricing of HotelTime allows for straightforward budgeting, whereas CQR’s costs are unclear, which could complicate decision-making.
HotelTime’s large review base, high recent ratings, and extensive feature set position it as the leading choice for most hoteliers. Its proven reliability, support quality, and global reach make it suitable for properties that need a scalable, integrated PMS.
CQR’s lack of current user feedback and limited information make it a risky choice for hotels that prioritize proven performance and support. If reliability, features, and customer satisfaction matter, HotelTime is the clear winner for your hotel.
According to HTR's product database, CQR PMS and HotelTime PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
What hoteliers love
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
While the support team's responsive and helpful nature is appreciated, some reviews suggest that extended hours for technical support would further en... While the support team's responsive and helpful nature is appreciated, some reviews suggest that extended hours for technical support would further enhance user experience, ensuring assistance at all times, especially for international users.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CQR PMS and HotelTime PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CQR PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while HotelTime PMS offers 58. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. HotelTime PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CQR PMS: No. HotelTime PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CQR has an HT Score of 0 and HOTELTIME has 92. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor