The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 248 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bowo shines in Value for Money — especially for city-center properties (4.9/5).
Crave Interactive/HCN shines in ease of use and guest experience — especially for motel properties (4.8/5), with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 248 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 51 | 197 |
After analyzing 248 verified reviews, Bowo users most value its guest communication, customization, user-friendly interface, while Crave Interactive/HCN users highlight ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Content and Design
▾
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
−
Tablet Durability
▾
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
−
WiFi and Technical Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 25 reviews | #4 31 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 17 reviews | #2 61 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 3 reviews | #2 71 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 0 reviews | #1 20 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 28 reviews | #2 86 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 33 reviews | #2 157 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 7 reviews | #2 51 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #5 4 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 1 reviews | #2 92 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 49 reviews | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 0 reviews | #2 6 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #4 1 reviews | #2 8 reviews |
BOWO Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive Tablets both target the in-room engagement segment, but they diverge significantly in scope and fit. BOWO focuses on a streamlined, user-friendly tablet experience with seamless PMS integration and in-room entertainment apps like Netflix, aimed at elevating guest satisfaction and ancillary revenue through upselling. Crave Interactive offers a broader feature set, including multi-lingual support, payments, and comprehensive ordering capabilities, designed to serve diverse hotel types with complex operational demands.
Both systems solve the core problem of modernizing guest interaction by centralizing hotel services and communications on in-room devices, reducing front desk load, and increasing guest convenience. They enhance guest experience by providing instant access to hotel information, services, and entertainment, but they do so at different scales and with different operational implications.
If you operate a boutique or luxury hotel in Europe or North America emphasizing guest experience with straightforward in-room entertainment and upselling, BOWO’s 4.7/5 overall rating across 51 reviews—with strong 4.7 ease of use and 4.8 support scores—reflects stable, well-received functionality. Its integration with popular entertainment apps and PMS suits properties prioritizing guest comfort and operational simplicity. BOWO’s 600+ hotel partners and presence in 17 countries underline its proven fit for hotels seeking a mature, flexible platform.
Conversely, if you manage a resort or branded hotel with complex ordering, multi-language needs, and payment integration across a multi-national footprint (22 countries), Crave Interactive’s 4.5/5 rating from 197 reviews supports a robust feature set unmatched by BOWO. Its 25 hotel-specific features absent in BOWO, including contactless ordering, mobile checkout, and local recommendations, cater to properties requiring comprehensive guest service automation. However, note Crave’s recent sharp 66% decline in review activity (4 reviews last six months vs 11.8 average prior), which may indicate changes in product support or market momentum.
Data on extended stay and budget segments is limited for both; BOWO has minor presence here, and Crave’s ratings hover around 4.4/5. Your choice hinges on whether your property prioritizes simplicity and entertainment (BOWO) or advanced guest service automation with payments and ordering (Crave).
BOWO scores 4.7/5 on ease of use and onboarding, slightly ahead of Crave Interactive’s 4.5/5 for both metrics, but the difference does not meet the 0.3 threshold for a decisive edge. Reviewers highlight BOWO’s intuitive, easy-to-navigate interface appreciated by both guests and staff, facilitating quick adoption and reducing training burdens. Crave’s tablets are praised for sleek design and intuitive software that enhances guest interactions, though some users mention limited customization restricts branding flexibility.
Staff adoption in both products benefits from straightforward workflows: BOWO’s integration of entertainment apps and simple room service ordering streamlines guest interactions, while Crave’s broader feature set requires slightly more initial staff familiarization. Neither product presents significant onboarding challenges based on reviews.
Edge: Even.
Crave Interactive leads distinctly on features with 25 hotel-specific functionalities not available in BOWO, including automatic translations for multi-lingual guests, integrated payments (Apple Pay, Google Pay, credit cards), request management, room service ordering with contactless and curbside pickup options, guest messaging, mobile checkout, QR codes, digital menus, POS integration, tipping, upselling, and order scheduling. These features transform guest engagement workflows, enabling the front desk and F&B teams to automate orders and payments, reducing manual errors and improving revenue capture.
BOWO offers 30 features shared with Crave but has zero unique capabilities, focusing instead on a refined core experience. Its strengths lie in seamless PMS integration, entertainment app support, and tailored guest communication, but it lacks Crave’s advanced ordering and payment ecosystem.
This operational difference matters: Crave suits hotels requiring comprehensive in-room service automation and multi-channel guest engagement. BOWO fits hotels prioritizing intuitive entertainment and communication tools without complex transactional features.
Edge: Crave Interactive Tablets.
BOWO scores 4.8/5 for customer support and 4.7/5 for onboarding, marginally higher than Crave Interactive’s 4.7/5 and 4.5/5 respectively. Both products receive praise for responsive, helpful support teams: BOWO users commend fast deployment and tailored development responses; Crave reviewers highlight attentive support staff delivering excellent training and quick issue resolution.
However, Crave also has documented negative feedback citing poor to terrible customer service with unaddressed issues and unsatisfactory communication, which appears to be an isolated but serious concern. BOWO’s reviews do not reflect such extremes, indicating more consistent support experiences.
Given the small rating gap and mixed Crave feedback, neither product earns a clear edge.
Edge: Even.
BOWO supports 34 verified integrations, double Crave’s 17. Both share key partners including PressReader, Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus. BOWO uniquely integrates with apaleo GmbH, Mews, RoomChecking, Octorate, and HiJiffy, which are relevant for hotels leveraging modern cloud PMS and guest communication platforms. Crave’s unique integrations include INTEREL, Book4Time, Quore, Kipsu, ALICE, and Agilysys, focusing on operational tools like spa and activity management, guest messaging, and POS systems.
Hotels reliant on advanced PMS and cloud property management will find BOWO’s integrations more extensive. Crave’s integration suite suits properties emphasizing operational task management and guest messaging workflows.
Edge: BOWO Guest Room Tablets.
BOWO holds a slightly higher all-time overall rating (4.7/5 from 51 reviews) than Crave Interactive (4.5/5 from 197 reviews), but the difference does not reach the 0.3 threshold for an edge call. Both products maintain robust ratings across segments.
BOWO excels in boutique hotels (4.6/5, 28 reviews) and luxury hotels (4.7/5, 33 reviews), with high scores in city center hotels (4.9/5, 13 reviews) and hostels (4.7/5, 13 reviews). Crave’s largest user ratings come from resorts (4.5/5, 114 reviews), luxury hotels (4.5/5, 160 reviews), and boutique hotels (4.6/5, 88 reviews). Both products perform well in boutique and luxury segments, but BOWO’s ratings in smaller, independent properties like hostels and city center hotels are stronger.
Crave’s recent review activity has dropped sharply by 66% in the last six months compared to the prior two years, reducing confidence that its all-time ratings reflect current product quality or support.
Edge: Even.
BOWO’s base price is $1,100 per unit, while Crave Interactive’s base price is slightly higher at $1,200. Neither product offers freemium options, monthly flat fees, nor monthly per-room pricing. Implementation fees are not charged by either vendor, and neither provides a trial period.
The pricing proximity suggests cost should not be the primary decision factor; instead, operational fit and feature differences should guide choice.
Hotels that should use BOWO:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should use Crave Interactive:
Not ideal if:
BOWO Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive Tablets both enhance in-room guest engagement but serve distinct hotel profiles. BOWO excels with a focused, user-friendly tablet experience integrating entertainment and PMS connectivity, fitting boutique and luxury hotels emphasizing guest comfort and streamlined operations. Crave Interactive offers a broader, more feature-rich platform supporting multi-language, payment integration, and comprehensive service ordering, suiting resorts and branded hotels with complex operational needs.
Choose BOWO if your hotel values intuitive guest entertainment and communication with proven PMS integrations, supported by strong 4.7/5 ratings and flexibility across 600+ partner hotels. Choose Crave Interactive if your hotel demands advanced ordering, payment, and multi-lingual capabilities, backed by 25 unique features and extensive integrations, keeping in mind its recent 66% drop in review volume which may affect reliability.
Both products are rated similarly on ease of use and support, but their operational fit and feature breadth should drive your decision.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Content & Information
|
|
|
| Publication subscriptions (ex. newspapers, magazines) | ||
| Travel information | ||
| Apps & games | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Hotel facilities integrations | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| View bill & express check out | ||
| Secured web browsing | ||
| Group & conference offerings | ||
| Local city guides | ||
| News & weather | ||
| Digital Menus | ||
| Bedside alarm | ||
| TV & room controls | ||
| Digital directory | ||
|
▾
Messaging & Communication
|
|
|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Video Concierge | ||
| Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews) | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Guest messaging | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| Hotel facilities integrations | ||
| Housekeeping requests | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Bell services | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
| Late checkout | ||
| Bedside alarm | ||
|
▾
Upselling & Offers
|
|
|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Loyalty program management | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Dynamic pricing | ||
| POS & PMS Integration | ||
| Digital Menus | ||
|
▾
Guest Profiles
|
|
|
| Loyalty program management | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| View bill & express check out | ||
|
▾
Advertising
|
|
|
| Sponsorship opportunities |
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We've managed to build a guest journey that's very intuitive and quite extraordinary."
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
What hoteliers love
Bowo is praised for facilitating better communication between guests and hotel staff, including features like guest feedback collection and real-time... Bowo is praised for facilitating better communication between guests and hotel staff, including features like guest feedback collection and real-time chat functionalities.
Users appreciate the high level of customization that Bowo offers, allowing them to tailor the tablet interface and available content to their specifi... Users appreciate the high level of customization that Bowo offers, allowing them to tailor the tablet interface and available content to their specific hotel brand and guest needs.
Many hoteliers commend Bowo for its intuitive and easy-to-use interface, which simplifies both guest and staff interactions. Guests find it straightfo... Many hoteliers commend Bowo for its intuitive and easy-to-use interface, which simplifies both guest and staff interactions. Guests find it straightforward to access hotel services and entertainment apps, while staff appreciate the ease of content modification.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have pointed out that while the design and aesthetics of the app are good, there is always room for further customization and improvement t... Some users have pointed out that while the design and aesthetics of the app are good, there is always room for further customization and improvement to better meet individual hotel needs.
A few reviews mention concerns regarding the physical durability of the tablets, noting that they can be fragile and prone to malfunctions, leading to... A few reviews mention concerns regarding the physical durability of the tablets, noting that they can be fragile and prone to malfunctions, leading to additional maintenance costs.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOWO Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN) share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. BOWO Guest Room Tablets offers 34 verified integration partners, while Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN) offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. BOWO Guest Room Tablets leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOWO Guest Room Tablets: No. Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bowo has an HT Score of 32 and Crave Interactive/HCN has 89. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property