The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 194 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Quadriga (IQ In-Room) shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 194 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 0 |
After analyzing 194 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Quadriga (IQ In-Room) users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing an in-room hotel tablet system hinges on your hotel’s priorities: guest engagement, operational efficiency, integration, or revenue growth. Crave Interactive and Quadriga both aim to enhance in-room experiences but serve distinct needs—Crave focuses on guest interaction and service automation, while Quadriga emphasizes entertainment and connectivity. Which aligns more with your hotel’s core objectives?
Crave Interactive excels in providing a comprehensive guest engagement platform with a proven track record, supported by over 147 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.6/5. Its features include digital directories, multilingual support, in-room ordering, and upselling tools, making it ideal for hotels aiming to optimize guest services and boost revenues. Conversely, Quadriga’s platform is tailored toward entertainment and connectivity, though it currently holds no recent reviews or ratings, limiting confidence in its effectiveness. Are your priorities centered on guest service automation or entertainment and internet access?
If your hotel needs a well-rated, reliable solution that enhances guest interactions and streamlines operations, Crave is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, ease of use (rated 4.5/5), and high customer support ratings (4.6/5) make it suitable for properties wanting to elevate service quality. On the other hand, if your focus is on providing high-quality entertainment, internet services, and creating a "better than home" experience, Quadriga might appeal—but the lack of recent reviews and verified ratings makes it a risky pick. For now, Crave’s proven track record is more dependable.
Crave’s intuitive interface is highly rated at 4.5/5, with strong onboarding ratings of 4.37/5, indicating your staff will adopt it quickly. Multiple reviews praise its simple navigation and guest-friendly design, enabling seamless interactions. Quadriga’s user experience is not documented, with no recent reviews or ratings to assess, leaving its ease of use uncertain. Given the available data, Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave offers an extensive library of 55 exclusive features, including digital menus, room controls, guest messaging, multi-lingual support, contactless ordering, integrations with POS and PMS systems, and upselling tools. Quadriga provides core entertainment and connectivity functions but offers no detailed feature count or unique features. Crave’s comprehensive feature set, proven in multiple hotel segments, clearly outstrips Quadriga. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s support and onboarding ratings are both high, at 4.6/5 and 4.37/5 respectively, with reviews highlighting quick responses and attentive service. Hoteliers appreciate Crave’s ability to resolve issues swiftly and its proactive support. Quadriga’s support information is absent, and no recent customer reviews are available to gauge levels of assistance. Based on current evidence, Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave boasts 17 verified integration partners, including Interel, PressReader, Oracle Hospitality, and Infor, facilitating seamless connection with existing hotel systems. Quadriga reports no verified integrations, which can limit operational efficiency and data flow. If integration is a priority, Crave’s extensive partner network provides a clear advantage. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s current review score of 4.6/5, drawn from 147 reviews, demonstrates broad hotelier confidence, especially among independent and boutique hotels. The recent reviews reinforce its relevance and performance. Quadriga has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine hotel satisfaction. Therefore, based on available data, hoteliers rate Crave higher. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing starts at a flat $1,200 for implementation, with no ongoing monthly fees or freemium options, making costs predictable. Quadriga’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison and budgeting. If budget certainty is crucial, Crave’s transparent pricing provides peace of mind. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Not ideal if: You primarily need entertainment, TV, or high-speed internet features, as those are not the core strengths of Crave.
Not ideal if: Your focus is on guest service automation, operational efficiency, or upselling, as Quadriga’s platform lacks extensive features in those areas.
Crave Interactive is a well-established, highly-rated in-room tablet solution with a large feature set, broad integration capabilities, and strong customer support. Its extensive recent reviews and proven performance make it a safe choice for most hotels looking to improve guest experience and operational efficiency today.
Quadriga, while promising in entertainment and connectivity, lacks recent reviews and verified integration data, making it a less reliable option at this time. Its appeal lies mainly in entertainment-focused properties that prioritize internet and TV services, but the absence of recent hotel feedback limits confidence.
In summary, if your hotel wants a trusted, feature-rich platform with proven customer satisfaction, Crave is the clear choice. If your main goal is entertainment and high-speed internet upgrades with a focus on "better than home" experiences, Quadriga could be worth exploring, though more recent data is needed.
Final recommendation: For most hotels, especially those valuing a reliable, highly-rated solution with broad integration and support, Crave Interactive is the better fit.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Quadriga (IQ In-Room) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Digital directory | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 43 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Quadriga (IQ In-Room) share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Quadriga (IQ In-Room) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Quadriga (IQ In-Room): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Quadriga (IQ In-Room) has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor