The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 295 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Volo shines in ease of use and ROI — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Guest messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 295 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 101 |
After analyzing 295 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Volo users highlight guest interaction and satisfaction, customer support responsiveness, in-room tablet features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
+
Guest Interaction and Satisfaction
▾
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
+
Customer Support Responsiveness
▾
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
+
In-room Tablet Features
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
+
Customization and Integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
−
Connectivity and Technical Issues
▾
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
−
Adaptation for Senior Guests
▾
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | #3 37 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | #3 49 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | #6 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | #8 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | #3 66 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | #3 47 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | #3 21 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | #2 20 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #1 96 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and Volo hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and guest experience goals. Both products aim to improve guest engagement, operational efficiency, and revenue, but they diverge in features, regional presence, and support. Crave offers a more extensive feature set and broader global reach, while Volo emphasizes simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and strong customer support. Which of these solutions aligns better with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Crave Interactive and Volo provide in-room tablet solutions designed to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences. Crave’s platform is recognized for its extensive feature list, including room controls, multi-lingual support, and integrated payment options, helping hotels offer a rich, customizable experience. Volo, on the other hand, focuses on core amenities like service ordering, local info, and guest messaging, with a simpler interface. Crave has a higher overall rating (4.6/5 vs. 4.89/5), but Volo’s recent reviews (more in the last 6 months) are more plentiful and more positive, which lends greater confidence in its current performance.
Crave’s reviews highlight exceptional customization, advanced integrations, and a polished UX, but some users find content updates challenging. Volo’s reviews emphasize ease of use, quick support, and a nearly flawless user experience, making it attractive for hotels prioritizing straightforward deployment. Both products aim to elevate guest engagement, but do their differing strengths match your hotel’s priorities?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, feature-rich system capable of managing multiple guest touchpoints, Crave is the way to go. Its extensive feature set (31 exclusive features and 24 shared) enables hotels to offer digital menus, contactless payments, room controls, and more, making it suitable for luxury and resort properties wanting advanced guest interactions.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, rapid onboarding, and strong support, Volo is the better choice. With only 9 unique features but a more recent surge in positive reviews (11 in the last six months), Volo appeals to boutique hotels, mid-scale properties, or brands seeking reliable, straightforward tech to boost guest satisfaction without complexity.
For hotels seeking a comprehensive, customizable experience, Crave is preferable. Conversely, for properties needing quick deployment and consistent support, Volo is the better fit. The decision boils down to your operational complexity and guest engagement strategy.
Crave’s user interface has received solid ratings (4.5/5), with reviews highlighting its intuitive design and fast performance. However, some users point out that content updates are complicated, requiring external support or technical know-how, which can slow down responsiveness.
Volo’s interface boasts a higher ease-of-use rating (4.85/5), and recent reviews praise its simple, guest-friendly layout that requires minimal staff training. The onboarding process is also rated higher (4.62/5 vs. 4.37/5), reflecting faster setup and quicker staff adoption.
Edge: Volo.
Crave’s platform offers a broader feature set, including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, in-venue ordering, guest messaging, digital menus, contactless payments, and room controls, totaling 31 unique features. Its integrations with POS systems, NFC, and sponsorship opportunities further enhance revenue potential.
Volo’s platform has 9 unique features, including in-room dining, news & weather, guest messaging, and digital concierge, with a focus on core amenities. Despite fewer features, Volo’s streamlined approach reduces complexity and deployment time.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s support team is highly praised in reviews, with overall ratings of 4.6/5, and users mention quick responses and attentive service, especially during onboarding. Some reviews note that content updates can be slow and support response times could improve.
Volo outperforms slightly in customer support ratings (4.89/5), with recent reviews emphasizing their responsiveness and proactive assistance. Customers appreciate the dedicated team’s availability for troubleshooting and the ease of resolving issues swiftly.
Edge: Volo.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus, with several unique integrations like Interel and Kipsu, facilitating diverse property management and marketing integrations.
Volo offers 22 verified integrations, including popular PMS and booking platforms like WebRezPro, Mews, and RoomKey PMS, with shared partners such as Oracle and Infor. Its broader integration set supports more seamless property management.
Edge: Volo.
Crave’s overall rating (4.6/5) is slightly lower than Volo’s (4.89/5), but Crave’s reviews cover a broader global hotel base, including luxury hotels (4.6/5). Volo’s reviews are more recent, with a high percentage of hotels (97%) willing to recommend.
In terms of hotel segments, Crave is favored in resorts and independent hotels, while Volo has higher ratings from boutique hotels and properties in North America, reflecting its strong regional presence and recent positive reviews.
Edge: Volo.
Both products are priced at a base fee of $1,200, with no ongoing monthly fees, implementation costs, or freemium options. Exact costs for additional services or customizations might vary, but the base pricing is identical, making the decision more about features and support.
Not ideal if you prefer quick deployment, simple interfaces, or limited technical support.
Not ideal if you need extensive customization, advanced integrations, or operate in regions where Volo has limited presence.
Crave is the most feature-rich in-room tablet solution, suitable for hotels that want to tailor every aspect of guest interaction and have the technical capacity to manage complex integrations. Its global presence and high-quality support make it a solid choice for large or high-end properties.
Volo offers a simpler, more intuitive system with a faster onboarding process, excellent support, and a focus on core amenities that resonate with boutique and mid-scale hotels. Its recent review momentum indicates ongoing improvements and high guest satisfaction.
Choose Crave if your hotel demands advanced functionality, extensive customization, and global reach. Opt for Volo if your priority is reliable, easy-to-use technology that enhances guest experience without overwhelming your team.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Volo share 24 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Bell services | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Guest messaging | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Late checkout | ||
| News & weather | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 28 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Most users report that Volo has significantly increased guest interaction and satisfaction. The ability to customize tablets for entertainment and com... Most users report that Volo has significantly increased guest interaction and satisfaction. The ability to customize tablets for entertainment and communication without the need for direct staff intervention is highly praised, helping to create a personalized and efficient guest experience.
While customer support is a generic feature, Volo's high responsiveness to queries and proactive problem-solving are frequently commended. The assuran... While customer support is a generic feature, Volo's high responsiveness to queries and proactive problem-solving are frequently commended. The assurance of quick issue resolution without involving hotel IT staff is a strong selling point noted by reviewers.
Reviewers consistently mention the versatility and convenience of Volo's in-room tablets, highlighting features that allow guests to order food, reque... Reviewers consistently mention the versatility and convenience of Volo's in-room tablets, highlighting features that allow guests to order food, request services, and access local information. This capability enhances the guest experience by offering a modern and interactive alternative to traditional hotel communication methods.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviews mention occasional technical issues, such as connectivity problems or missed requests. Despite these challenges, the majority emphasize V... Some reviews mention occasional technical issues, such as connectivity problems or missed requests. Despite these challenges, the majority emphasize Volo's efficiency in addressing problems swiftly, maintaining high service standards.
A few reviews mention challenges faced by senior guests in adapting to the technology. Suggestions for features like larger text options or audio aids... A few reviews mention challenges faced by senior guests in adapting to the technology. Suggestions for features like larger text options or audio aids are noted, indicating areas for potential improvement to enhance senior accessibility.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Volo share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Volo offers 22. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Volo leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Volo: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Volo has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor