The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 543 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
SuitePad shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) .
Side-by-side ratings based on 543 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 349 |
After analyzing 543 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, customization and branding, while SuitePad users highlight guest communication, customization and content management, upselling and promotions. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
+
Customization and Content Management
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
+
Upselling and Promotions
▾
|
|
+
Upselling and Revenue Opportunities
▾
|
+
Room Service and In-Room Dining
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
−
Device Performance
▾
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | #1 58 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | #1 201 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | #2 60 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | #2 12 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | #1 153 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | #1 166 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | #1 102 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | #1 23 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #5 5 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | #1 297 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | #1 8 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | #1 11 reviews |
Choosing the right in-room hotel tablet system can significantly influence your guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Crave Interactive and SuitePad are two leading options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Both platforms aim to streamline guest communication and enhance engagement, but they diverge in their feature sets, user experience, and support. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs and priorities.
Crave Interactive is known for its extensive feature set, robust integrations, and a broader global presence, while SuitePad emphasizes premium hardware, high guest satisfaction scores, and a focus on sustainability. Given the current market data, which product offers the most value for your hotel?
Both Crave and SuitePad aim to elevate your guest experience with in-room tablets, but they serve slightly different hotel types and operational philosophies. Crave leans toward hotels seeking deep customization and a versatile set of features like multi-lingual support, digital menus, and integrated payments, making it ideal for upscale properties with complex service offerings. SuitePad, on the other hand, excels in delivering a sleek, user-friendly interface with a focus on communication, upselling, and eco-friendly practices, suited for properties aiming for simplicity and sustainability.
Crave’s strength lies in its extensive integrations and feature count—over 26 unique features—targeting hotels that want comprehensive control and advanced options. SuitePad offers a more curated experience with 29 shared features and a focus on ease of use, guest engagement, and safety, such as its no-camera policy. Given these differences, your choice depends on whether your hotel values feature depth or streamlined simplicity.
Are you looking for a platform with extensive customization and advanced integrations, or one that prioritizes intuitive design and guest safety?
If your hotel operates in a luxury or boutique segment that values high customization, multi-language support, and payment integrations, Crave is the better choice. Its feature set includes in-room ordering, guest messaging, web-app access, and NFC, making it suitable for hotels that want to offer a versatile, multi-functional guest experience.
Conversely, if your hotel emphasizes guest communication, sustainability, and quick implementation, SuitePad is preferable. It’s rated higher for ease of use, with a 4.68/5 UI rating, and offers robust in-room features like booking, hotel directory, and TV control. For properties focused on high guest engagement and simplicity, SuitePad’s reputation for high user satisfaction makes it stand out.
For hotels seeking a feature-rich, highly customizable system, Crave is ideal. If your goal is intuitive operation with a focus on communication and sustainability, SuitePad is the recommended choice.
Crave’s platform scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, with reviews noting the intuitive interface and seamless guest interactions. Its onboarding process is rated 4.37/5, which suggests solid but potentially room for improvement in staff training and implementation.
SuitePad edges out slightly with a 4.68/5 UI rating and onboarding score of 4.65/5, with users praising its simplicity, quick setup, and minimal learning curve. Many hotel staff and guests find SuitePad’s interface more approachable, leading to faster staff adoption and higher guest satisfaction.
Edge: SuitePad.
Crave offers 26 features exclusive to its platform, including in-room payments, request management, web-app access, QR code integration, contactless ordering, and POS system integration. Its extensive feature list supports complex service environments and upselling strategies.
SuitePad provides a slightly smaller but highly curated set of 29 shared features, including guest directory, booking, room control, and eco-friendly options like Green Option. Its features are tailored for straightforward, engaging guest interactions, with a focus on communication and sustainability.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support scores 4.6/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and support team’s effectiveness during setup and ongoing operations. Some users, however, mention occasional delays in content updates and limited customization in support.
SuitePad outperforms slightly with a support rating of 4.84/5, and reviews highlight their proactive communication, quick response times, and dedicated onboarding assistance. Many users describe SuitePad’s support as a key factor in their positive experience.
Edge: SuitePad.
Crave boasts 17 verified integrations, including partners like PressReader, Book4Time, Kipsu, and Google Pay. Its integrations support a broad range of hotel operations, from guest entertainment to payments.
SuitePad has 23 verified partners, including FLEXIPASS, Mews, hotelkit, and Beekeeper, offering extensive options for property management, guest communication, and access control. Its high number of integrations provides flexibility for diverse hotel ecosystems.
Edge: SuitePad.
SuitePad leads with an overall rating of 4.78/5, based on 290 reviews, and a recent review count of 13 in the last six months. Hoteliers across segments like luxury and city center properties express high satisfaction with its ease of use and guest engagement.
Crave scores 4.6/5 from 147 reviews, with a focus on its feature depth and customization. However, its fewer recent reviews and slightly lower overall rating suggest SuitePad currently enjoys a higher user approval.
Edge: SuitePad.
Crave’s pricing starts at $1,200 for a base package, with no mention of monthly fees or implementation charges—indicating a straightforward licensing model. SuitePad’s base price is $1,400, also without additional implementation fees, but with a slight premium.
While both are similarly priced, SuitePad’s performance-based pricing model in some cases offers more flexibility, especially for hotels wary of upfront costs. Pricing details should be confirmed directly to tailor the best plan for your property.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a simplified, easy-to-deploy system or has limited staff capacity for complex integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires deep customization, advanced integrations, or a highly technical platform with extensive backend controls.
Crave Interactive is a versatile, feature-rich platform that suits hotels needing extensive customization, multi-lingual support, and deep integration. It’s best for larger, upscale properties with dedicated technical teams and complex service needs.
SuitePad offers a sleek, user-friendly experience with excellent guest engagement and support for sustainability initiatives. Its high ratings, ease of use, and extensive integrations make it a top choice for hotels wanting quick deployment and high guest satisfaction.
If your hotel values comprehensive features and flexibility, Crave is the clear winner. For properties prioritizing simplicity, guest experience, and support, SuitePad is the stronger candidate.
In conclusion, SuitePad's higher recent review count, user ratings, and support quality position it as the leading choice for most hoteliers focused on guest engagement and operational ease. However, if your hotel demands a highly customizable system with advanced features, Crave will serve you well—just be prepared for a steeper learning curve and potentially longer setup times.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and SuitePad share 29 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 14 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 7 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The Green Option has a dual impact, benefiting both the environment and our finances. It aligns perfectly with our sustainable and environmentally conscious direction that we shoul..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I saw SuitePad’s backend and knew immediately that it would be quick and easy to use for our team. The same goes for the guest-facing content. Its layout follows the style of moder..."
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
"SuitePad helped us achieve our goals of upgrading our service and successfully promoting our in-house offers. It also gives us space to keep trying new things all while providing t..."
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The intuitive and user-friendly nature of SuitePad is praised for enhancing guest satisfaction, with even non-tech-savvy guests finding it easy to nav... The intuitive and user-friendly nature of SuitePad is praised for enhancing guest satisfaction, with even non-tech-savvy guests finding it easy to navigate. The tablet’s straightforward interface and accessibility to services contribute significantly to a pleasant guest experience.
SuitePad facilitates effective and direct guest communication, making it easy for hotels to manage service requests, updates on events, and interact d... SuitePad facilitates effective and direct guest communication, making it easy for hotels to manage service requests, updates on events, and interact directly with guests. Guests appreciate the ability to communicate in real time, although some users mentioned desires for more options like voice or instant messaging for direct communication.
SuitePad supports high levels of customization, allowing hotels to tailor content to specific guest preferences and update information efficiently. So... SuitePad supports high levels of customization, allowing hotels to tailor content to specific guest preferences and update information efficiently. Some users recommend enhancements in how content is uploaded and synchronized across various devices.
Where hoteliers push back
While most users commend SuitePad's functionality, there are recurring concerns about device performance, such as freezing issues, slow performance, a... While most users commend SuitePad's functionality, there are recurring concerns about device performance, such as freezing issues, slow performance, and hardware quality. Improving these areas could further enhance user satisfaction.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and SuitePad share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while SuitePad offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SuitePad leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. SuitePad: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and SuitePad has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor