The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 194 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
SurferQuest shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 194 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 0 |
After analyzing 194 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while SurferQuest users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
SurferQuest |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
SurferQuest |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
SurferQuest |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
SurferQuest |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and SurferQuest for your hotel’s in-room tablet solution hinges on your specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to connect guests with hotel services, but their core functionalities and market presence differ significantly. Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive customer reviews and proven hotel integrations. SurferQuest, by contrast, appears more limited in scope, with fewer features and no recent reviews or verified customer feedback.
So, which platform will truly serve your hotel’s operational and guest engagement goals? Let’s explore how they compare across key aspects to help you make an informed decision.
Crave Interactive is a robust in-room tablet solution designed specifically for hotels, boasting a 92.76 HTR Score, a 4.6 out of 5 overall rating, and 147 reviews—most recent within six months. Its features include digital directories, room service ordering, payments, messaging, and integrations with hotel PMS systems, making it a versatile tool for enhancing guest experience and operational efficiency.
SurferQuest, however, has no recent reviews or verified user ratings, and its market presence is nonexistent outside the review marketplace. It appears to be a kiosk management and internet access platform with a narrow focus on basic browsing and printing services, lacking the broader hotel-centric features of Crave. Do you want a solution with proven results and ongoing support?
Edge: Crave Interactive.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest engagement system that includes digital directories, multi-lingual support, room service, payments, and extensive integrations, Crave is the clear choice. Its large user base spans luxury, boutique, resort, and city-center hotels, with high satisfaction ratings reflecting consistent performance.
If your hotel simply needs basic internet access kiosks or printing stations without a focus on in-room services, SurferQuest might meet your minimal needs. Without recent reviews or substantial features tailored for the hospitality industry, it’s less suitable for hotels seeking a modern, integrated guest experience.
For hotels aiming to boost operational efficiency and guest satisfaction with a trusted, feature-rich platform, Crave is the better fit. SurferQuest’s simplicity limits its usefulness for full-service hotels.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive’s UI has a 4.5/5 ease-of-use rating and is praised for its intuitive, responsive design. Its onboarding process scores 4.37/5, with many users citing quick implementation and easy staff adoption. The platform's design emphasizes straightforward navigation, making it accessible for both guests and staff.
SurferQuest has no current user ratings or reviews, leaving its usability unverified. Its focus on kiosk management and internet access suggests a simpler interface, but without user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge how easily your team can learn and operate it.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive offers 55 unique features tailored for hotels, including digital menus, room controls, guest messaging, payments, upselling, loyalty management, and integration with POS and PMS systems. These features support a full guest journey, from pre-arrival to post-stay, and enable operational automation.
SurferQuest, in contrast, has no features exclusive to hotels beyond basic kiosk services like internet access, printing, and local info displays. It lacks the extensive hospitality-specific functionalities needed to elevate the guest experience or optimize hotel operations.
For feature depth and variety, Crave is unmatched. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive’s customer support scores 4.6/5, with reviewers praising their responsiveness and proactive assistance. Many users highlight quick onboarding and ongoing support that helps resolve issues swiftly, ensuring smooth implementation and operation.
SurferQuest has no available reviews or ratings regarding support quality. Its lack of verified customer feedback makes it impossible to assess how well it addresses hotel needs post-sale.
Given the established support reputation, Crave is evidently more reliable for hotels that value responsive service. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave boasts 17 verified integration partners, including Interel, Book4Time, Quore, Oracle Hospitality, and more. Its ability to connect with PMS, POS, and other hotel management systems allows for a unified guest experience and streamlined operations.
SurferQuest has no confirmed integrations, limiting its potential to connect with other hotel systems or marketing channels. Its functionality appears confined to basic kiosk operations.
Hotels seeking a scalable, interconnected platform should favor Crave’s extensive integration options. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.6/5 overall rating derived from 147 reviews, and a 90% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, especially independent and luxury properties, highlight its intuitive interface, feature set, and support as key strengths.
SurferQuest has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property preferences.
Given the depth of feedback and recent positive experiences, Crave clearly holds the higher regard among hoteliers. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive charges a base price of $1,200, with no mention of monthly fees, implementation costs, or trial options—implying a straightforward pricing model. Its value proposition is reinforced by extensive features and support included in that price.
SurferQuest’s pricing information is unavailable, indicating it may lack transparent or scalable pricing. This ambiguity suggests it may not be suitable for hotels seeking predictable costs or ROI analysis.
For a clear cost-to-value ratio, Crave’s transparent pricing and feature-rich offering make it a safer investment. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Not ideal if your hotel needs only basic internet browsing stations or minimal guest interaction tools—Crave’s comprehensive platform might be more than you require.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a full in-room experience, integrated guest services, or operational automation; SurferQuest’s scope is too narrow for these needs.
Crave Interactive offers a feature-rich, widely supported platform with proven success in diverse hotel segments. Its extensive integrations, high satisfaction ratings, and ongoing support make it a reliable choice for hotels aiming to elevate guest engagement and operational efficiency.
SurferQuest appears to be a basic kiosk management tool with no recent reviews, limited features, and no verified support or integrations. It’s more suited for simple digital signage or internet access in non-hotel environments.
If you want a proven, scalable, and holistic in-room tablet solution that enriches guest experiences and simplifies operations, Crave is the clear choice. SurferQuest, without visible recent validation, is unlikely to meet the demands of modern hospitality.
In summary: Choose Crave Interactive if your goal is a comprehensive, adaptable, and well-supported guest engagement platform. Opt for SurferQuest only if your needs are minimal, and you prioritize basic kiosk functionalities without needing extensive features or integrations.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
SurferQuest | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and SurferQuest share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
SurferQuest |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Digital directory | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 43 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and SurferQuest share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while SurferQuest offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. SurferQuest: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and SurferQuest has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor